Management Changes
Banco Santander Chile Appoints New CEO Amid Mixed Financial Performance
Financial Sector
The Largest Companies in Money Center Banks Industry
Explore the largest companies by market capitalization, revenue, income, and employees within the Money Center Banks industry
TTM data as of: September 27, 2026
Total Market Cap
$ 2,087B
Total Revenue (TTM)
$ 1,019B
Total Net Income (TTM)
$ 155B
Total Employees
1,190,460
Explore the largest companies by market capitalization, revenue, income, and employees within the Money Center Banks industry
| Company | Market Cap (Millions) |
Revenue TTM (Millions) |
Net Income TTM (Millions) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Bank Of Canada | $ 285,113 | $ 51,019 | $ 15,603 |
| Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Group Inc | $ 267,634 | $ 78,862 | $ 12,519 |
| Santander Uk Group Holdings Plc | $ 215,948 | $ 5,719 | $ 1,471 |
| Toronto dominion Bank | $ 208,483 | $ 51,917 | $ 15,732 |
| Ubs Ag | $ 163,426 | $ 67,739 | $ 7,797 |
| Total Money Center Banks Industry | $ 2,086,627 | $ 1,019,072 | $ 155,151 |
30 more companies available
Sign in to unlock the full Money Center Banks Industry dataset.
Industry Benchmarking Dataset for Institutional Use
CommercialThe data presented above is part of our institutional-grade Industry Benchmarking Dataset, designed for integration into credit risk models, AML/KYC frameworks, portfolio analytics, and internal banking systems. The full dataset is available under a Commercial License, with delivery via API or bulk CSV datasets.
Available under institution-grade licensing frameworks with defined usage rights,
distribution scope, and integration permissions, supporting internal use,
client reporting, and enterprise-wide deployment.
Dataset 1 - Profitability Benchmarks
Margin benchmarks across the full industry distribution
Gross, operating, EBITDA, pre-tax, net, and free cash flow margins - delivered as TTM, quarterly, and annual series with P25 / median / P75 / standard deviation for every reporting period.
Net margin (TTM Q4)
7.44%
+2.11pp vs prior yr
Gross margin
10.44%
industry avg
FCF margin
13.66%
strong
Companies reported
31
Q4 2025
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
37
metrics per period
Annual indicators
10
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
740
20 quarters × 37
Annual endpoints
50
5 fiscal years × 10
Gross, operating, EBITDA, net & FCF margins
TTM, quarterly & fiscal year series
P25 / median / P75 / std dev per period
YoY margin change & acceleration
Effective tax rate & pre-tax margin
Profitability composite score (0–100)
Report preview - Profitability Benchmarks - Aerospace & Defense
Dataset 2 - Growth Dynamics
Revenue, income & cash flow growth across 13+ line items
Industry-level growth benchmarks for every major P&L and cash flow line - with breadth indicators showing what share of companies posted positive growth, acceleration metrics, and rolling TTM comparisons.
Revenue growth (TTM Q4)
12.84%
improving
Net income growth
18.45%
above revenue
FCF growth
13.60%
strong
EPS acceleration
+3.69pp
vs prior TTM
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
31
metrics per period
Annual indicators
7
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
1,420
20 quarters × 31
Annual endpoints
35
5 fiscal years × 7
Revenue, gross, EBIT & operating income growth
Net income, EPS (basic & diluted) growth
FCF, net cash flow & CapEx growth
Breadth: % of companies with positive growth
QoQ, YoY, TTM & 3-year CAGR
Growth composite score (0–100)
Report preview - Growth Dynamics - Aerospace & Defense
Dataset 3 - Valuation Multiples
Industry valuation multiples with 5-year context & Z-scores
P/E, P/S, P/FCF, P/Book, EV/EBITDA - current and trailing - with five-year averages, percentile ranks, Z-scores, and a composite valuation score to place the industry in historical context.
P/E ratio (current)
22.4x
vs 5yr avg 14.2x
EV/EBITDA (TTM)
13.1x
P25–P75: 4.5x–20.4x
Earnings yield
4.46%
attractive
Composite val. score
61.7
moderately valued
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
29
metrics per period
Annual indicators
10
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
580
20 quarters × 29
Annual endpoints
50
5 fiscal years × 10
P/E, P/S, P/CF, P/FCF, P/Book multiples
EV/EBITDA & EV/Sales (current & TTM)
5-year historical average per multiple
Z-scores & percentile ranks
Earnings yield & FCF yield
Composite valuation score (0–100)
Report preview - Valuation Multiples - Aerospace & Defense
Dataset 4 - Operational Efficiency
Productivity, turnover ratios & cash conversion benchmarks
Revenue and income per employee, asset and receivables turnover, days sales outstanding, days inventory, days payables, and the full cash conversion cycle - benchmarked across the industry distribution.
Revenue / employee
$487K
improving
Asset turnover
0.61x
P75: 0.80x
Cash conv. cycle
113 days
above avg
Efficiency score
68.7
composite 0–100
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
16
metrics per period
Annual indicators
12
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
320
20 quarters × 16
Annual endpoints
60
5 fiscal years × 12
Revenue & net income per employee
Asset, receivables & inventory turnover
DSO, DIO, DPO & cash conversion cycle
Working capital per revenue
YoY & TTM trend for all metrics
Efficiency composite score (0–100)
Report preview - Operational Efficiency - Aerospace & Defense
Dataset 5 - Management Effectiveness
ROA, ROE, ROIC & DuPont decomposition benchmarks
Return metrics measuring how effectively management allocates capital - with incremental ROIC, DuPont decomposition, FCF quality indicators, and a composite management effectiveness score across the industry.
Return on assets
5.05%
vs 4.44% prior
Return on equity
14.22%
improving
ROIC (TTM)
9.77%
P75: 12.4%
Effectiveness score
72.4
composite index
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
20
metrics per period
Annual indicators
16
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
400
20 quarters × 20
Annual endpoints
80
5 fiscal years × 16
ROA, ROE & ROIC - TTM & quarterly
Incremental ROIC & capital intensity
DuPont 3-factor decomposition
FCF conversion quality metrics
P25 / median / P75 / std dev per metric
Management effectiveness composite (0–100)
Report preview - Management Effectiveness - Aerospace & Defense
Dataset 6 - Financial Strength
Leverage, liquidity & debt coverage across the industry
Debt-to-equity, interest and debt coverage, quick ratio, working capital, leverage ratios - full distribution statistics - in standardized, audit-ready format suited for credit workflows, compliance, and ESG reporting.
Debt / equity (TTM)
1.44x
above industry avg
Interest coverage
8.32x
comfortable
Quick ratio
0.91x
vs P75 1.18x
Fin. strength score
58.4
composite 0–100
Data coverage per industry
Quarterly indicators
21
metrics per period
Annual indicators
17
fiscal year metrics
Quarterly endpoints
420
20 quarters × 21
Annual endpoints
85
5 fiscal years × 17
Quick ratio & working capital ratio
Total & LT debt-to-equity
Leverage & tangible leverage ratios
Interest & debt coverage ratios
P25 / median / P75 / std dev per metric
Financial strength composite score (0–100)
Report preview - Financial Strength - Aerospace & Defense
Methodology
1. Data Coverage & Universe
2. Aggregation Methodology
3. Ratio Construction
4. Distribution Analytics
5. Percentile Rankings
6. Volatility & Trend Metrics
7. Composite Scores
8. Data Quality Controls
9. Update Frequency
10. Use Cases
11. Licensing & Access
Recent News from The Largest Companies in Money Center Banks Industry
Decision Framework & Data Access
Power onboarding, benchmarking, and quantitative analysis with institutional-grade datasets structured for direct integration into financial models and risk frameworks.
- Industry benchmarking datasets (valuation, growth, profitability)
- Designed for quant models, AML/KYC validation & onboarding workflows
- Consistent time-series structure (Quarterly, TTM, Annual)
- Coverage across 100+ industries and 20+ years of history