Texas Mineral Resources's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Texas Mineral Resources (TRER) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
API endpoints for this dataset
Texas Mineral Resources's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TRER Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nucor Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Reliance Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Steel Dynamics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Cleveland cliffs Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Commercial Metals Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Texas Mineral Resources's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Texas Mineral Resources's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Texas Mineral Resources Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Texas Mineral Resources Corp |
- | - |
 Nucor Corporation |
56,951.34 | 36,101.00 |
 Steel Dynamics Inc |
32,682.85 | 22,219.88 |
 Reliance Inc |
21,637.95 | 17,367.80 |
 Commercial Metals Company |
7,200.74 | 9,393.90 |
 Cleveland cliffs Inc |
7,037.24 | 20,073.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 126,945.87 | 105,555.38 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Texas Mineral Resources Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Texas Mineral Resources's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Texas Mineral Resources reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| RTMD | Company report | 85% |
| Chinese | Company report | 85% |
| Scandium International Mining Corp | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Texas Mineral Resources's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Texas Mineral Resources's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nucor Corporation | Steel mills 63.56 % |
| Reliance Inc | Metals Service Centers Segment 100.00 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | North America Steel Group 72.06 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Steelmaking 97.86 % |
| Mcewen Inc | Gold Bar Mine Complex in Nevada United States 58.23 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Texas Mineral Resources's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | - | - | -1,510,193 |
| Nucor Corporation | 56,951 | 1,093,970 | 98,667 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 32,683 | 1,543,047 | 135,514 |
| Reliance Inc | 21,638 | 1,106,229 | 70,592 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 7,201 | 687,191 | 61,791 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 7,037 | 802,920 | -18,080 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 126,946 | 1,035,608 | 67,508 |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
Texas Mineral Resources's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Steel Dynamics Inc | US 93.87 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | United States 81.10 % |
| Mcewen Inc | US 58.23 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Texas Mineral Resources's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 130 companies in Texas Mineral Resources's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Texas Mineral Resources ranks #0 of 130 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 727, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bhp Group Limited | 210,400 | 15.78 % |
| 2 | Southern Copper Corp | 147,485 | 11.06 % |
| 3 | Newmont Corporation | 133,546 | 10.02 % |
| 4 | Rio Tinto Plc | 108,501 | 8.14 % |
| 5 | Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Freeport mcmoran Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Franco nevada Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Anglogold Ashanti Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Gold Fields Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Texas Mineral Resources Corp | 13 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Texas Mineral Resources's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2016-03-18.
Texas Mineral Resources's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | - | -356.02 % | -35.56 % | -44.61 % | -69.86 % | -50.86 % | -57.03 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Texas Mineral Resources's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 727 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Texas Mineral Resources's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Texas Mineral Resources's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 142.9 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 30.1% median pace.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Texas Mineral Resources's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | 7.39 | 12.10 | 0.03 |
| Nucor Corporation | 0.52 | 2.76 | 0.31 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 0.31 | 3.13 | 0.46 |
| Reliance Inc | 0.22 | 4.40 | 0.22 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 0.37 | 2.44 | 1.03 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 0.02 | 1.93 | 1.26 |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Texas Mineral Resources's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +23.0 % | +81.3 % |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | Q3 2026 | +34.8 % | +87.2 % |
| Reliance Inc | Q3 2026 | +42.8 % | +112.1 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q3 2026 | +25.7 % | +40.0 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q3 2026 | +18.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +27.7 % | +129.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Texas Mineral Resources's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.6 % | -40.1 % |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | Q3 2026 | +28.4 % | -9.7 % |
| Reliance Inc | Q3 2026 | +43.5 % | -2.7 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q3 2026 | +25.3 % | +61.2 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q3 2026 | +7.7 % | -3.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
Texas Mineral Resources's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | - | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | 9.14% | 9.96% | 14.49% |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 11.46% | 12.50% | 21.19% |
| Reliance Inc | 10.08% | 10.90% | 15.05% |
| Commercial Metals Company | 9.18% | 8.99% | 18.95% |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Texas Mineral Resources's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Texas Mineral Resources Corp | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | 19.89 | 1.58 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 16.83 | 1.47 |
| Reliance Inc | 19.65 | 1.25 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 10.98 | 0.77 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | 0.35 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.46 | 1.20 |
Sign in to see all peers for Texas Mineral Resources Corp .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.