Trident Brands Incorporated's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Trident Brands Incorporated (TDNT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Trident Brands Incorporated vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 85,051M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+143.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-2.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Trident Brands Incorporated generated 170.9% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2022, vs 7.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -1,250.7% net margin compares with 8.1% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Trident Brands Incorporated accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.21M compares with $0.63M for the peer group (0.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TDNT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Trident Brands Incorporated reported revenue growth of 170.92 % year on year in Q2 2022, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.85 %.
With a net margin of -1,250.71 %, Trident Brands Incorporated reported lower profitability than its competitors (8.05 %).
Trident Brands Incorporated generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Trident Brands Incorporated vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Trident Brands Incorporated and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Trident Brands Incorporated's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Food Processing industry grew revenue 11.1% year over year, combined, vs 170.9% for Trident Brands Incorporated. Trident Brands Incorporated's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (13) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 50.00 % (3 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TDNT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TDNT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Mama s Creations Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | The J M Smucker Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Colgate palmolive Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Trident Brands Incorporated's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Trident Brands Incorporated
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | - | 0.21 |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 68,409.58 | 21,046.00 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 12,702.34 | 9,157.10 |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 12,490.88 | 7,385.80 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 10,993.93 | 12,147.26 |
| The Clorox Company | 9,865.96 | 6,760.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 138,624.32 | 85,049.46 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Trident Brands Incorporated.
Sources: Trident Brands Incorporated's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Trident Brands Incorporated versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Colgate palmolive Company | Oral, Personal and Home Care 77.71 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | U.S. Retail Coffee 38.83 % |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | Consumer 59.01 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Retail 60.21 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Feed Ingredients 66.67 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | - | 205,952 | 191,476 |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 68,410 | 626,369 | 64,345 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 12,702 | 1,308,157 | 32,786 |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 12,491 | 523,816 | 115,929 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 10,994 | 607,363 | 17,123 |
| The Clorox Company | 9,866 | 768,182 | 87,500 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 138,624 | 629,547 | 31,069 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| The J M Smucker Company | United States 94.68 % |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | Americas 72.91 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | North America 58.21 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 53 companies in Trident Brands Incorporated's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Trident Brands Incorporated ranks #0 of 53 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,017, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mondel z International Inc | 74,357 | 25.17 % |
| 2 | Hershey Co | 32,196 | 10.90 % |
| 3 | Kraft Heinz Co | 26,946 | 9.12 % |
| 4 | Tyson Foods Inc | 17,938 | 6.07 % |
| 5 | General Mills Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | The J M Smucker Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Magnum Ice Cream Co N v | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hormel Foods Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Smithfield Foods Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Trident Brands Incorporated | - | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Trident Brands Incorporated's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-05-22.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Food Processing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (82 companies). See the full Food Processing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 8.37 % | 25.78 % (avg) | -17.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | -1,230.43 % | industry median | -1,200.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 167.24 % | -1.11 % (avg) | +168.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.86 % (avg) | -4.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | 500.00 % | 500.00 % | 19.23 % | -61.92 % | -59.47 % | -74.26 % |
| Operating Margin | - | -11,843.78 % | -1,553.81 % | -112.85 % | -110.43 % | -302.80 % | -495.69 % | -1,078.17 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -67.29 % | 104.49 % | 103.78 % | 361.68 % | 32.95 % | 16.70 % | 6.34 % | 4.45 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Trident Brands Incorporated's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Trident Brands Incorporated is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,017 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.86 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Trident Brands Incorporated's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Trident Brands Incorporated's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Trident Brands Incorporated falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Trident Brands Incorporated's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+143.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 1,200.7 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 13.4 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-2.7% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 0.21 | 0.95 | 12.14 |
| The J M Smucker Company | - | 0.83 | 1.24 |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 0.05 | 0.74 | 0.68 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 0.47 | 2.15 | 0.45 |
| The Clorox Company | 0.18 | 0.82 | 9.85 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | Q2 2022 | +170.9 % | - |
| Colgate palmolive Company | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | -7.0 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | - |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +16.7 % | -8.5 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.3 % | -67.6 % |
| The Clorox Company | Q1 2026 | +0.1 % | +0.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +4.0 % | +13.1 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | Q2 2022 | +495.8 % | - |
| Colgate palmolive Company | Q2 2026 | +1.2 % | +18.5 % |
| The J M Smucker Company | Q2 2026 | -24.3 % | +4.9 % |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +11.7 % | -11.6 % |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | Q2 2026 | -2.2 % | -5.6 % |
| The Clorox Company | Q1 2026 | +2.6 % | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
Trident Brands Incorporated's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | 17.73% | - | - |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 12.86% | 19.90% | 325.73% |
| The J M Smucker Company | 1.36% | 1.58% | 3.92% |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 11.03% | 12.80% | 24.51% |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 2.56% | 2.95% | 4.33% |
| The Clorox Company | 13.34% | 19.55% | 257.96% |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Trident Brands Incorporated's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Trident Brands Incorporated | - | - |
| Colgate palmolive Company | 33.79 | 3.25 |
| The J M Smucker Company | 55.41 | 1.39 |
| Mccormick and Company Incorporated | 7.72 | 1.69 |
| Hormel Foods Corporation | 31.75 | 0.91 |
| The Clorox Company | 13.17 | 1.46 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 33.03 | 1.63 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trident Brands Incorporated.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.