Premier Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Premier Inc (PINC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Premier Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,005M vs 164,700M combined for tracked competitors (0.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-9.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Premier Inc generated -3.2% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2025, vs -18.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.4% net margin compares with 12.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Premier Inc ranks #20 of 92 companies by market capitalization in the Internet Services & Social Media industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Premier Inc accounted for 0.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.35M compares with $0.23M for the peer group (1.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PINC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Premier Inc reported revenue contraction of 3.16 % year on year in Q1 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -18.58 %.
With a net margin of 6.38 %, Premier Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.91 %).
Premier Inc generated 0.64 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.54 % a year earlier.
Premier Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Premier Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Premier Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Internet Services & Social Media industry grew revenue 20.1% year over year, combined, vs -3.2% for Premier Inc. Premier Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.09% to 0.07%, a loss of 0.02 percentage points.
Premier Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (13) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PINC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PINC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
PINC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
PINC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Teradata Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Willdan Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | International Business Machines Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Infosys Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Carecloud Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Premier Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Premier Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Premier Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | 4,117.59 | 1,004.54 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830.00 | 73,266.00 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,356.66 | 69,096.00 |
| Infosys Limited | 43,343.54 | 20,158.00 |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | 9,980.19 | 1,602.17 |
| Teradata Corporation | 2,746.51 | 1,752.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 673,363.63 | 185,862.89 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Premier Inc .
Sources: Premier Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Premier Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Premier Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Health Catalyst Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Six Flags Entertainment Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Manchester United Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ani Pharmaceuticals Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Contigo Health | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zillow Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Heartland Financial Usa Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Simply Good Foods Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Liberty Media Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Shoals Technologies Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Textron Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Veradigm Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ashford Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Premier Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Premier Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Premier Inc | Supply Chain Services 63.48 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Kyndryl Holdings Inc | Principal Markets Segment 35.77 % |
| Willdan Group inc | Energy 87.69 % |
| Evolent Health Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Premier Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | 4,118 | 346,392 | -8,695 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,357 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| Infosys Limited | 43,344 | 77,645 | 12,773 |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | 9,980 | 276,236 | 49,969 |
| Teradata Corporation | 2,747 | 307,368 | 80,351 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 669,246 | 227,436 | 41,007 |
Premier Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | United States, Canada, and Latin America 53.29 % |
| Kyndryl Holdings Inc | Countries Excluding United States and Japan 59.79 % |
| Willdan Group inc | US 100.00 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Premier Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 75 companies in Premier Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Premier Inc ranks #20 of 75 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.17 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 6,223, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meta Platforms Inc | 1,858,015 | 78.61 % |
| 2 | Applovin Corporation | 104,741 | 4.43 % |
| 3 | Nebius Group n v | 60,012 | 2.54 % |
| 4 | Gds Holdings Limited | 52,815 | 2.23 % |
| 5 | Rentokil Initial Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Thomson Reuters Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Zoom Communications Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Digitalocean Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Flutter Entertainment Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Gartner Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 20 | Premier Inc | 4,121 | 0.17 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Premier Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Premier Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Factset Research Systems Inc | 9,667 | -5.90 % |
| 16 | Snap Inc | 8,741 | -36.91 % |
| 17 | Kanzhun Limited | 6,387 | -41.36 % |
| 18 | Trade Desk Inc | 5,792 | -73.64 % |
| 19 | Niq Global Intelligence Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Premier Inc | 4,121 | 180.84 % |
| 21 | Wix com Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 22 | Sportradar Group Ag | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 23 | Magnite Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 24 | Grindr Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 25 | Trump Media and Technology Group Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Premier Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Premier Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Internet Services & Social Media industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (112 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 73.02 % | 53.20 % (avg) | +19.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -0.93 % | industry median | +1.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 11.66 % | 8.63 % (avg) | +3.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 8.41 % | 6.24 % (avg) | +2.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Premier Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Internet Services & Social Media industry average (112 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 40.0x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.6x | 20.6x | -1.0x |
| P/B | 1.4x | 4.5x | -3.1x |
| Return on Equity | -1.60 % | industry aggregate | -33.54 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.24 % | 0.06 % (avg) | -0.30 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Premier Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 24.61 % | 6.17 % | -39.61 % | 42.41 % | 17.17 % | -19.68 % | -3.48 % | -10.18 % |
| Operating Margin | 31.95 % | 23.50 % | 37.55 % | 20.45 % | 16.52 % | 18.83 % | 16.74 % | -4.59 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 86.96 % | 65.84 % | 23.32 % | 7.75 % | 5.54 % | 5.26 % | 4.23 % | -1.21 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | 16.0x | 18.0x | 22.6x | 15.4x | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Premier Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Premier Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Premier Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Premier Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Premier Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Premier Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.1% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Meta Platforms Inc alone holds 79% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Premier Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 6,223 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 8.41 % vs industry average 6.24 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Premier Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Premier Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Premier Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Premier Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Premier Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 33.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-4.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Meta Platforms Inc , holding 78.61 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-9.2% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Premier Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | 0.08 | 0.68 | 0.10 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
| Infosys Limited | 0.42 | 1.98 | 0.03 |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | 0.14 | 0.57 | 1.01 |
| Teradata Corporation | 0.59 | 1.01 | 0.85 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Premier Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | Q3 2025 | -3.2 % | -78.6 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.6 % | +4.9 % |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +13.0 % | +11.4 % |
| Teradata Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.4 % | +411.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +8.8 % | +21.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Premier Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | Q3 2025 | +3.0 % | +10.1 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
| Infosys Limited | Q1 2026 | +4.4 % | - |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | Q2 2026 | +8.8 % | +88.6 % |
| Teradata Corporation | Q2 2026 | -6.2 % | -75.0 % |
Premier Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | - | - | - |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
| Infosys Limited | 20.16% | 30.31% | 33.70% |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | 8.21% | 11.19% | 24.09% |
| Teradata Corporation | 24.96% | 45.61% | 114.57% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Premier Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Premier Inc | - | 4.10 |
| Oracle Corporation | 20.79 | 5.43 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 19.55 | 3.04 |
| Infosys Limited | 13.84 | 2.15 |
| Bentley Systems Incorporated | 35.16 | 6.23 |
| Teradata Corporation | 6.01 | 1.57 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 20.22 | 3.62 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.