Micropac Industries Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Micropac Industries Inc (MPAD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Micropac Industries Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 37M vs 89,562M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+35.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-17.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Micropac Industries Inc generated 95.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2024, vs -12.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 23.5% net margin compares with 9.4% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Micropac Industries Inc accounted for 0.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.07M compares with $0.31M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MPAD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Micropac Industries Inc reported revenue growth of 95.62 % year on year in Q3 2024, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -12.88 %.
With a net margin of 23.52 %, Micropac Industries Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (9.42 %).
Micropac Industries Inc generated 0.07 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.03 % a year earlier.
Micropac Industries Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Micropac Industries Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Micropac Industries Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs 95.6% for Micropac Industries Inc. Micropac Industries Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Micropac Industries Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (17) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MPAD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MPAD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MPAD Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ttm Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Benchmark Electronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Sanmina Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Plexus Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Jabil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Micropac Industries Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Micropac Industries Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
There are approximately 35 independent manufacturing companies who are certified to supply microcircuits to MIL-PRF-38534 or supply semiconductors to MIL-PRF-19500, in addition to OEM?s, who manufacture hybrid microcircuits for their internal needs. Micropac may compete with all of these for hybrid microcircuit, power management and optoelectronics business. Some of the Company?s primary competitors are TTM Technologies, Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions, TT Electronics, and Infineon Technologies.
Publicly Traded Peers of Micropac Industries Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | 52.95 | 37.36 |
| Jabil Inc | 33,966.05 | 33,590.00 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 26,661.24 | 6,791.00 |
| Fabrinet | 14,861.87 | 4,641.10 |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,360.73 | 3,376.84 |
| Nova Ltd | 12,149.78 | 880.58 |
| SUBTOTAL | 128,234.63 | 89,604.29 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Micropac Industries Inc .
Sources: Micropac Industries Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Micropac Industries Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Micropac Industries Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| TTM Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Broadcom Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Broadcom Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| TT Electronics | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cobham Advanced Electronic Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Anaren Microwave | Named by the company | 85% |
| Infineon Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Micropac Industries Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Micropac Industries Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Intelligent Infrastructure 47.64 % |
| Fabrinet | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Commercial 58.57 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Reportable Segment - IMS 85.36 % |
| Plexus Corp | Asia Pacific 56.05 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Micropac Industries Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | 53 | 74,724 | 9,996 |
| Jabil Inc | 33,966 | 248,815 | 6,378 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 26,661 | 4,244,375 | 555,000 |
| Fabrinet | 14,862 | 215,654 | 21,980 |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,361 | 185,541 | 13,010 |
| Nova Ltd | 12,150 | 1,291,169 | 380,092 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 128,182 | 309,740 | 13,659 |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Micropac Industries Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Fabrinet | Asia Pacific 73.85 % |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | US 48.94 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Americas 69.06 % |
| Benchmark Electronics Inc | US 53.60 % |
| Ncr Voyix Corporation | United States 61.88 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Micropac Industries Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 44.67 % | 34.40 % (avg) | +10.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 14.03 % | industry median | +14.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 20.74 % | 7.07 % (avg) | +13.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.01 % | 9.39 % (avg) | -6.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Micropac Industries Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 7.8x | 43.3x | -35.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.7x | 22.7x | -17.0x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 6.6x | -5.5x |
| Return on Equity | 13.71 % | industry aggregate | -1.63 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.95 % | -0.16 % (avg) | 6.11 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Micropac Industries Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -12.15 % | 3.91 % | -100.00 % | - | - | - | 1.81 % | 10.27 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.64 % | 7.54 % | - | - | 7.30 % | 13.77 % | 8.59 % | 1.81 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.64 % | 3.03 % | 2.74 % | 8.22 % | 2.79 % | 6.15 % | 3.01 % | 0.66 % |
| P/E | - | 14.0x | 15.5x | 9.8x | 20.9x | 16.3x | 12.2x | 51.5x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Micropac Industries Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Micropac Industries Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Micropac Industries Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Micropac Industries Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.01 % vs industry average 9.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Micropac Industries Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Micropac Industries Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Micropac Industries Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Micropac Industries Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Micropac Industries Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 14.0 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+35.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (7.8x vs 43.3x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (35.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-17.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Micropac Industries Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | 2.74 | 8.07 | 0.43 |
| Jabil Inc | 0.11 | 0.99 | 2.44 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 0.76 | 2.62 | 0.08 |
| Fabrinet | 0.31 | 2.60 | - |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 0.46 | 1.87 | 0.52 |
| Nova Ltd | 0.96 | 6.28 | 0.56 |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Micropac Industries Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | Q3 2024 | +95.6 % | - |
| Jabil Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.8 % | +23.9 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | +0.6 % | - |
| Fabrinet | Q2 2026 | +44.6 % | +59.7 % |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +37.5 % | +100.0 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.0 % | +41.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +14.8 % | +252.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Micropac Industries Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | Q3 2024 | +21.1 % | +132.0 % |
| Jabil Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.9 % | +114.0 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | -0.4 % | +15.5 % |
| Fabrinet | Q2 2026 | +45.0 % | +82.4 % |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +36.1 % | +3.2 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.6 % | +60.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
Micropac Industries Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | 9.01% | 9.68% | 13.71% |
| Jabil Inc | 4.19% | 15.49% | 62.17% |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 5.18% | 5.51% | 7.41% |
| Fabrinet | 14.27% | 21.02% | 21.50% |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 5.94% | 8.20% | 13.09% |
| Nova Ltd | 10.98% | 11.74% | 19.66% |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Micropac Industries Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | 10.56 | 1.42 |
| Jabil Inc | 39.92 | 1.01 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 30.05 | 3.93 |
| Fabrinet | 31.39 | 3.20 |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 55.94 | 3.96 |
| Nova Ltd | 46.54 | 13.80 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.43 | 1.43 |
Sign in to see all peers for Micropac Industries Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.