Jabil Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Jabil Inc (JBL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Jabil Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 35,954M vs 77,233M combined for its competitors (31.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+18.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+15.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Jabil Inc generated 28.7% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2026, vs 38.3% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 3.8% net margin compares with 4.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Jabil Inc ranks #20 of 115 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Jabil Inc accounted for 32.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 33.9% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.07M compares with $1.00M for the peer group (0.1x).
- Structure: Jabil Inc operates in the following segments: Intelligent Infrastructure, Regulated Industries, Connected Living and Digital Commerce.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
JBL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Jabil Inc reported revenue growth of 28.65 % year on year in Q4 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 38.27 %.
With a net margin of 3.75 %, Jabil Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (4.77 %).
Jabil Inc generated 32.31 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 33.91 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Jabil Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Jabil Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Jabil Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Jabil Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 48.1% year over year, combined, vs 28.7% for Jabil Inc. Jabil Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.10% to 1.82%, a loss of 0.27 percentage points.
Jabil Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (21) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
JBL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
JBL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
JBL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
JBL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arrow Electronics inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Plexus Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Benchmark Electronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Flex Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Globalfoundries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Jabil Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Jabil Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Jabil Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Jabil Inc |
25,558.72 | 35,954.00 |
 Flex Ltd |
26,095.85 | 30,920.00 |
 Celestica Inc |
25,173.62 | 18,230.60 |
 Globalfoundries Inc |
21,549.96 | 6,791.00 |
 Fabrinet |
11,852.90 | 5,137.43 |
 Nova Ltd |
10,272.30 | 880.58 |
| SUBTOTAL | 157,238.96 | 391,655.14 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Jabil Inc.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Jabil Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Jabil Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Jabil Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kimball Electronics Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sypris Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sanmina Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Fabrinet | Company report | 85% |
| Td Synnex Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Ultra Clean Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Apple, Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Sonos Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Amazon.com | Company report | 85% |
| Foxconn Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Celestica Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Key Tronic Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Highway Holdings Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Graybar Electric Company Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Flex Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Plexus Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Sigmatron International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Arrow Electronics inc | Company report | 85% |
| Iec Electronics Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Micropac Industries Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Benchmark Electronics Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Jabil Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Jabil Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Intelligent Infrastructure 47.64 % |
| Flex Ltd | Integrated Technology Solutions 38.94 % |
| Celestica Inc | CCS, Networking 55.98 % |
| Fabrinet | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Arrow Electronics inc | Global Components 70.09 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Reportable Segment - IMS 85.36 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Jabil Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | 25,559 | 67,966 | 1,968 |
| Flex Ltd | 26,096 | 208,757 | 7,001 |
| Celestica Inc | 25,174 | 616,086 | 42,101 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 21,550 | 4,244,375 | 555,000 |
| Fabrinet | 11,853 | 238,717 | 22,332 |
| Nova Ltd | 10,272 | 1,291,169 | 380,092 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 131,680 | 1,002,430 | 17,716 |
Jabil Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Other Countries 29.53 % |
| Fabrinet | Asia Pacific 71.99 % |
| Arrow Electronics inc | Other Foreign 42.04 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Americas 69.06 % |
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Other Than United States and Thailand 48.51 % |
| Benchmark Electronics Inc | US 53.35 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Jabil Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 107 companies in Jabil Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Jabil Inc ranks #20 of 107 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.25 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,187, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 4,532,552 | 45.12 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 790,050 | 7.86 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 744,957 | 7.42 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 287,253 | 2.86 % |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | United Microelectronics Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 20 | Jabil Inc | 25,463 | 0.25 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Jabil Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Jabil Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | Stmicroelectronics N v | 38,475 | 75.46 % |
| 16 | Astera Labs Inc | 34,965 | 5.77 % |
| 17 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | 32,122 | 0.28 % |
| 18 | Flex Ltd | 26,096 | 7.97 % |
| 19 | On Semiconductor Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 20 | Jabil Inc | 25,463 | 12.18 % |
| 21 | Qnity Electronics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 22 | Celestica Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 23 | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 24 | First Solar Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 25 | Globalfoundries Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Jabil Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Jabil Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (180 companies). See the full Semiconductors industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.09 % | 29.37 % (avg) | -29.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 0.04 % | industry median | -7.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 0.07 % | 4.97 % (avg) | -4.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 8.78 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Jabil Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (180 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Semiconductors industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 32.8x | 39.2x | -6.4x |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.3x | 21.5x | -8.1x |
| P/B | 23.5x | 6.0x | +17.5x |
| Return on Equity | 0.74 % | industry aggregate | -30.48 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.30 % | -0.97 % (avg) | 1.27 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Jabil Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 13.17 % | 14.19 % | 4.99 % | 8.79 % | 15.08 % | -3.16 % | -17.83 % | 13.18 % |
| Operating Margin | 2.66 % | 2.43 % | 2.40 % | 3.63 % | 4.07 % | 4.42 % | 6.94 % | 4.08 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.99 % | 9.69 % | 9.27 % | 13.19 % | 15.86 % | 15.48 % | 23.28 % | 19.18 % |
| P/E | 27.8x | 31.1x | 29.8x | 13.2x | 10.3x | 21.8x | 12.7x | 33.3x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Jabil Inc's Strategic Group Map
Jabil Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Jabil Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 20.6% and operating margin of 0.0% compares with an average of 18.9% growth and 0.6% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Jabil Inc sits above that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Jabil Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Jabil Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.2% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 45% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Jabil Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,187 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Jabil Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Jabil Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Jabil Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Jabil Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+18.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 7.8 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 30.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.2% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (32.8x vs 39.2x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 45.12 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Jabil Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | 0.10 | 1.00 | 2.50 |
| Flex Ltd | 0.21 | 1.35 | 0.83 |
| Celestica Inc | 0.24 | 1.40 | 0.49 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 0.76 | 2.62 | 0.08 |
| Fabrinet | 0.27 | 2.33 | 0.01 |
| Nova Ltd | 0.96 | 6.28 | 0.56 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Jabil Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Q3 2026 | +28.6 % | +82.6 % |
| Flex Ltd | Q3 2026 | +25.0 % | +32.2 % |
| Celestica Inc | Q3 2026 | +82.6 % | +48.3 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | +0.6 % | - |
| Fabrinet | Q3 2026 | +50.7 % | +7.9 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.0 % | +41.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +34.8 % | +150.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Jabil Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | Q3 2026 | +28.7 % | +45.6 % |
| Flex Ltd | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +60.7 % |
| Celestica Inc | Q3 2026 | +86.8 % | +5,610.4 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | -0.4 % | +15.5 % |
| Fabrinet | Q3 2026 | +50.9 % | +249.8 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.6 % | +60.9 % |
Jabil Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | 4.60% | 17.89% | 71.67% |
| Flex Ltd | 4.46% | 8.84% | 19.34% |
| Celestica Inc | 12.33% | 21.40% | 38.31% |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 5.18% | 5.51% | 7.41% |
| Fabrinet | 12.81% | 19.79% | 20.32% |
| Nova Ltd | 10.98% | 11.74% | 19.66% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Jabil Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | 24.52 | 0.71 |
| Flex Ltd | 25.28 | 0.84 |
| Celestica Inc | 16.67 | 1.38 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 24.29 | 3.17 |
| Fabrinet | 24.67 | 2.31 |
| Nova Ltd | 39.34 | 11.67 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 21.46 | 0.40 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.