Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Kingfish Holding's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Kingfish Holding (KSSH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q3 2026
Competitors Tracked
1
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-26.76 %
Q3 2026
Net Margin
-6.22 %
Q3 2026

Key Findings: Kingfish Holding vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3M vs 1M combined for tracked competitors (71.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-1.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Peer revenue share: Kingfish Holding accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.34M compares with $0.42M for the peer group (0.8x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

KSSH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

Kingfish Holding generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KSSH/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KSSH/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/KSSH/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Kingfish Holding vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026

TTM net margin

Kingfish Holding -11.6 %
Competitors combined -1,458.0 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Kingfish Holding and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Kingfish Holding Corporation $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (1) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Kingfish Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Wholesale industry grew revenue 8.3% year over year, combined, vs -26.8% for Kingfish Holding. Kingfish Holding's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Kingfish Holding's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Kingfish Holding Corporation No No No Yes
Competitors combined (1) - - - -
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 50.00 % (4 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q3 2026

100%market share
  • Kingfish Holding100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Kingfish Holding and its 1 tracked competitors.

See Kingfish Holding's full market share breakdown »

KSSH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

KSSH Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Kingfish Holding's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(0 of 1)
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 2)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Kingfish Holding Corporation - -
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Kingfish Holding's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

KSSH Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

KSSH High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

KSSH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

KSSH Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Aquabounty Technologies Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Kingfish Holding's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Kingfish Holding's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The Company operates in the southern Tampa Bay, Florida market, competing against five local scrap yards. Its primary competitors in the metal recycling sector include Nucor (Trademark Metals), Suncoast Metals, and Best Metals. Competition mainly comes from scrap yards located in northern Sarasota County and southern Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties. The scrap yard industry is highly price competitive, with each yard specializing in materials such as aluminum, copper, or copper wire. The Company maintains competitive pricing, a clean facility, efficient processing, and customer service with average wait times under seven minutes, accommodating a wide range of delivery sizes.

Publicly Traded Peers of Kingfish Holding Corporation

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Kingfish Holding Corporation 0.00 3.08 -0.36 9
Aquabounty Technologies Inc 4.88 1.26 -18.35 3
SUBTOTAL 4.89 4.34 -18.71 12

Sources: Kingfish Holding Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Kingfish Holding Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Kingfish Holding's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Suncoast Metals Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Best Metals Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nucor (Trademark Metals) Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Kingfish Holding's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Kingfish Holding's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Kingfish Holding Corporation 0 342,169 -39,552
Aquabounty Technologies Inc 5 419,504 -6,116,541
PEERS TOTAL 5 419,504 -6,116,541

Kingfish Holding's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 26 companies in Kingfish Holding's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Kingfish Holding ranks #0 of 26 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 3,596, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Walmart Inc 862,861 53.77 %
2 Costco Wholesale Corp 410,707 25.59 %
3 Target Corporation 72,069 4.49 %
4 W w Grainger Inc 58,975 3.67 %
5 Sysco Corporation 1,234 5.2%
6 Dollar General Corp 1,234 5.2%
7 Dollar Tree Inc 1,234 5.2%
8 Us Foods Holding Corp 1,234 5.2%
9 Best Buy Co Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Five Below Inc 1,234 5.2%
0 Kingfish Holding Corporation 0 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Kingfish Holding's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2023-12-05.

Kingfish Holding's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Wholesale industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (43 companies).
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 42.35 % 27.15 % (avg) +15.2 pp
Operating Margin -12.93 % industry median -17.0 pp
EBITDA Margin -11.45 % -0.10 % (avg) -11.3 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.00 % 2.47 % (avg) -2.5 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Kingfish Holding's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20202021202220242025
Revenue Growth -----4.13 %
Operating Margin ---6.01 %7.24 %
Return on Invested Capital -49.34 %6.94 %17.04 %108.65 %14.09 %
P/E -----

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Kingfish Holding's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Kingfish Holding's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Kingfish Holding is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)SSOKAENTCONNSCOOIDSABIGFREDKingfish HoldingAEY

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Kingfish Holding's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry Low Industry HHI of 3,596 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 2.47 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Kingfish Holding's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Kingfish Holding's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Kingfish Holding's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest Kingfish Holding
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest
Harvest / Divest

Kingfish Holding falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Kingfish Holding's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

No rule matched.

Weaknesses

  • Operating margin 17.0 points below the industry median.
  • Return on equity 178.3 points below the industry aggregate.
  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

  • Industry dominated by Walmart Inc , holding 53.77 % of industry market cap.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Kingfish Holding's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Kingfish Holding Corporation 0.16 0.76 0.09 1.28
Aquabounty Technologies Inc 0.12 1.05 1.38 0.09

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Kingfish Holding's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Kingfish Holding CorporationQ2 2026-26.8 %-7.7 %--
Aquabounty Technologies Inc Q2 2026----
PEERS TOTAL-26.8 %-7.7 %--

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Kingfish Holding's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Kingfish Holding CorporationQ2 2026-27.9 %-20.1 %--
Aquabounty Technologies Inc Q2 2026----

Kingfish Holding's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Kingfish Holding Corporation---226.1019.15
Aquabounty Technologies Inc ---50.34-

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Kingfish Holding's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Kingfish Holding Corporation-0.00--0.04
Aquabounty Technologies Inc -3.88-4.211.74
PEERS AVERAGE-1.138.721.67

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.