Dss Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dss Inc (DSS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dss Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 18M vs 8,637M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-21.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Dss Inc generated -31.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs -0.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -139.7% net margin compares with 1.1% for the peer group.
- Scale: Dss Inc ranks #11 of 11 companies by market capitalization in the Containers & Packaging industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Dss Inc accounted for 0.2% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.18M compares with $0.38M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DSS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Dss Inc reported revenue contraction of 31.81 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -0.73 %.
With a net margin of -139.71 %, Dss Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (1.10 %).
Dss Inc generated 0.16 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.24 % a year earlier.
Dss Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Dss Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Dss Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Containers & Packaging industry grew revenue 4.3% year over year, combined, vs -31.8% for Dss Inc. Dss Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Dss Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (16) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DSS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DSS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
DSS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
DSS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Dss Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Dss Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Dss Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | 6.93 | 18.35 |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 2,744.48 | 8,637.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,751.40 | 8,655.35 |
Sources: Dss Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Dss Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Dss Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Graphic Packaging Holding Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mead Westvaco | Named by the company | 85% |
| New Era | Named by the company | 85% |
| Perfect | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amway | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | Named by the company | 85% |
| Canon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Xerox | Named by the company | 85% |
| Forever Living | Named by the company | 85% |
| IBIO | Named by the company | 85% |
| Klaire Labs | Named by the company | 85% |
| National Center of Natural Product Development at the University of Mississippi | Named by the company | 85% |
| Opsec | Named by the company | 85% |
| American Pacific Bancorp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sharp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Authentix | Named by the company | 85% |
| West Rock Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| De La Rue Plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Herbalife | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ipsen Pharmaceuticals | Named by the company | 85% |
| MOSAID | Named by the company | 85% |
| NoCopi Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Acacia | Named by the company | 85% |
| Round Rock Research LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| APB | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vorwerk | Named by the company | 85% |
| Caraustar Industries, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Young Living | Named by the company | 85% |
| Impact Biomedical Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mary Kay | Named by the company | 85% |
| Natura | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pendrell Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| American Pacific Financial | Named by the company | 85% |
| Standard Register Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Avon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wi-LAN | Named by the company | 85% |
| Eastman Kodak | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hewlett Packard | Named by the company | 85% |
| IPvalue Management Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mylan Consumer Healthcare | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Dss Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Dss Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Dss Inc | Product Packaging 90.84 % |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | Americas Paperboard Packaging 67.96 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Dss Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | 7 | 179,853 | -303,667 |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 2,744 | 375,522 | 8,435 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,744 | 375,522 | 8,435 |
Dss Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 11 companies in Dss Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Dss Inc ranks #11 of 11 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.01 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,732, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smurfit Westrock Plc | 23,707 | 25.95 % |
| 2 | Packaging Corp Of America | 20,872 | 22.84 % |
| 3 | Ball Corporation | 15,262 | 16.70 % |
| 4 | Crown Holdings Inc | 11,800 | 12.91 % |
| 5 | Sonoco Products Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Reynolds Consumer Products Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Silgan Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Ardagh Metal Packaging S a | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | O i Glass Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Dss Inc | 7 | 0.01 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Dss Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Dss Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Reynolds Consumer Products Inc | 4,677 | -5.54 % |
| 7 | Silgan Holdings Inc | 3,803 | -14.36 % |
| 8 | Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Ardagh Metal Packaging S a | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | O i Glass Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Dss Inc | 7 | -49.13 % |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Dss Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Dss Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Containers & Packaging industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (14 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | - | 18.22 % (avg) | - |
| Operating Margin | -90.25 % | industry median | -95.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -140.34 % | 8.91 % (avg) | -149.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.05 % | 4.57 % (avg) | -2.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Dss Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Containers & Packaging industry average (14 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 21.0x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 12.8x | - |
| P/B | 0.4x | 2.1x | -1.7x |
| Return on Equity | -221.96 % | industry aggregate | -228.06 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -22.27 % | 5.26 % (avg) | -27.53 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Dss Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -0.79 % | 4.83 % | -10.30 % | 19.52 % | 191.34 % | -48.67 % | -28.39 % | 11.73 % |
| Operating Margin | -9.23 % | -14.84 % | -61.73 % | -123.35 % | -113.00 % | -76.30 % | -229.23 % | -69.52 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -10.69 % | -11.44 % | -10.97 % | -10.54 % | -13.25 % | -6.79 % | -26.92 % | -17.10 % |
| P/E | 261.9x | - | - | 0.1x | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Dss Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Dss Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Dss Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Dss Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Dss Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Dss Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 1.7% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Dss Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,732 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.05 % vs industry average 4.57 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Dss Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Dss Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Dss Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Dss Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Dss Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 95.5 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 228.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-21.4% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (100.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Dss Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | 0.11 | 0.26 | 2.29 |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 0.09 | 1.40 | 1.78 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dss Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | Q2 2026 | -31.8 % | - |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | Q2 2026 | -0.7 % | -76.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | -0.8 % | -81.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dss Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | Q2 2026 | - | -81.5 % |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | Q2 2026 | +6.3 % | -63.6 % |
Dss Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | - | - | - |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 1.65% | 2.04% | 5.92% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Dss Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Dss Inc | - | 0.38 |
| Graphic Packaging Holding Co | 14.02 | 0.32 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 16.88 | 0.32 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.