Cresud Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cresud Inc (CRESY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cresud Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 23,864M vs 176,320M combined for tracked competitors (11.9% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-16.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Cresud Inc generated 28.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs -3.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 24.5% net margin compares with 2.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Cresud Inc ranks #28 of 75 companies by market capitalization in the Real Estate Operations industry, holding 0.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Cresud Inc accounted for 39.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 32.7% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $8.26M compares with $1.92M for the peer group (4.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CRESY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Cresud Inc reported revenue growth of 28.51 % year on year in Q4 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -3.56 %.
With a net margin of 24.54 %, Cresud Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (2.73 %).
Cresud Inc generated 39.25 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 32.65 % a year earlier.
Cresud Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cresud Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cresud Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Real Estate Operations industry grew revenue 10.9% year over year, combined, vs 28.5% for Cresud Inc. Cresud Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 19.92% to 23.09%, a gain of 3.17 percentage points.
Cresud Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CRESY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CRESY Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CRESY Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bunge Global Sa | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Adecoagro S a | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Mosaic Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cresud Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Cresud Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Cresud Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | 713.41 | 23,864.07 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,984.30 | 82,099.00 |
| Bunge Global Sa | 21,346.72 | 80,547.00 |
| Mosaic Co | 7,073.28 | 12,246.70 |
| Adecoagro S a | - | 1,427.73 |
| SUBTOTAL | 68,117.71 | 200,184.50 |
Sources: Cresud Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cresud Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cresud Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cencosud S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| RAGHSA S.A. | Named by the company | 85% |
| IRSA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Adecoagro S a | Named by the company | 85% |
| RAGHSA | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cresud Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cresud Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 76.86 % |
| Bunge Global Sa | Soybean Processing and Refining 60.69 % |
| Mosaic Co | Phosphates 47.57 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Cresud Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | 713 | 8,260,321 | 2,027,371 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 38,984 | 1,978,480 | 42,872 |
| Bunge Global Sa | 21,347 | 2,369,029 | 21,000 |
| Mosaic Co | 7,073 | 924,349 | -69,605 |
| Adecoagro S a | - | 446,167 | -2,112 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 67,404 | 1,917,673 | 17,011 |
Cresud Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Mosaic Co | United States 39.43 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Cresud Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 68 companies in Cresud Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Cresud Inc ranks #28 of 68 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.22 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,417, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Airbnb Inc | 93,180 | 28.78 % |
| 2 | Ke Holdings inc | 58,852 | 18.18 % |
| 3 | Cbre Group Inc | 38,305 | 11.83 % |
| 4 | Api Group Corporation | 16,755 | 5.17 % |
| 5 | Invitation Homes Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Jones Lang Lasalle Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Rollins Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Terreno Realty Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Brookfield Property Partners L p | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Firstservice Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 28 | Cresud Inc | 713 | 0.22 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cresud Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Cresud Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | Forestar Group Inc | 1,621 | 59.75 % |
| 24 | Ellington Financial Inc | 1,553 | -11.62 % |
| 25 | Office Properties Income Trust | 1,218 | 1,580.43 % |
| 26 | Marcus and Millichap Inc | 1,101 | -2.22 % |
| 27 | Hudson Pacific Properties Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 28 | Cresud Inc | 713 | 43.21 % |
| 29 | Gladstone Commercial Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 30 | Exp World Holdings inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 31 | Ah Realty Trust Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 32 | Tejon Ranch Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 33 | Boston Omaha Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Cresud Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Cresud Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Cresud Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Cresud Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Cresud Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,417 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cresud Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cresud Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cresud Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Cresud Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Cresud Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-16.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cresud Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | 0.25 | 1.24 | 253.18 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.47 | 1.36 | 0.36 |
| Bunge Global Sa | 0.17 | 1.70 | 0.87 |
| Mosaic Co | 0.06 | 1.26 | 0.35 |
| Adecoagro S a | 0.28 | 1.03 | 0.77 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cresud Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | +28.5 % | +138.7 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +7.2 % | +320.3 % |
| Bunge Global Sa | Q1 2026 | +87.8 % | -63.2 % |
| Mosaic Co | Q2 2026 | -6.0 % | - |
| Adecoagro S a | Q4 2025 | -6.0 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +30.0 % | +94.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cresud Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | +31.8 % | -41.7 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | -10.8 % |
| Bunge Global Sa | Q1 2026 | +91.0 % | +8.4 % |
| Mosaic Co | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | -50.4 % |
| Adecoagro S a | Q4 2025 | +27,186.6 % | +1.5 % |
Cresud Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | 0.12% | 0.14% | 183.68% |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 3.33% | 5.61% | 7.77% |
| Bunge Global Sa | 1.68% | 2.67% | 4.47% |
| Mosaic Co | - | - | - |
| Adecoagro S a | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cresud Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cresud Inc | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 22.03 | 0.47 |
| Bunge Global Sa | 24.96 | 0.27 |
| Mosaic Co | - | 0.58 |
| Adecoagro S a | 4.78 | - |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 9.18 | 0.34 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.