Bunge Global Sa's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Bunge Global Sa (BG) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Bunge Global Sa vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 93,468M vs 84,062M combined for its competitors (52.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+1.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Bunge Global Sa generated 7.4% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 9.6% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 1.3% net margin compares with 3.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Bunge Global Sa ranks #3 of 44 companies by market capitalization in the Agricultural Production industry, holding 13.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Bunge Global Sa accounted for 51.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 52.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $2.75M compares with $1.77M for the peer group (1.6x).
- Structure: Bunge Global Sa operates in the following segments: Soybean Processing and Refining, Grain Merchandising and Milling, Softseed Processing and Refining, Tropical Oils and Specialty Ingredients, Corporate and Unallocated.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
BG Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Bunge Global Sa reported revenue growth of 7.44 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.64 %.
With a net margin of 1.34 %, Bunge Global Sa reported lower profitability than its competitors (3.68 %).
Bunge Global Sa generated 51.59 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 52.10 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Bunge Global Sa vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Bunge Global Sa reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Bunge Global Sa and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Bunge Global Sa's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Agricultural Production industry grew revenue 7.5% year over year, combined, vs 7.4% for Bunge Global Sa. Bunge Global Sa's share of combined industry revenue moved from 20.60% to 20.60%, a loss of 0.01 percentage points.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (7) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
BG Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
BG Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
BG Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Archer daniels midland Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Chs Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Cresud Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Lavoro Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Bunge Global Sa's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Bunge Global Sa's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Bunge Global Sa
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Bunge Global Sa |
19,121.59 | 93,468.00 |
 Archer daniels midland Co |
34,107.48 | 84,062.00 |
 Darling Ingredients Inc |
8,143.79 | 6,548.66 |
 Cresud Inc |
539.99 | 889.12 |
 Golden Growers Cooperative |
77.45 | 58.73 |
 Sadot Group Inc |
3.42 | 246.57 |
| SUBTOTAL | 61,993.72 | 223,918.40 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Bunge Global Sa.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Bunge Global Sa versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Bunge Global Sa reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Wilmar International Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Cargill Incorporated | Company report | 85% |
| COFCO International | Company report | 85% |
| Varthomio | Company report | 85% |
| Archer Daniels Midland Co. | Company report | 85% |
| Louis Dreyfus Company B.V. | Company report | 85% |
| AAK AB | Company report | 85% |
| Fuji Oil Co. Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Louis Dreyfus Group | Company report | 85% |
| Glencore | Company report | 85% |
| Adecoagro S a | Company report | 85% |
| Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy Llc | Company report | 85% |
| Chs Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Lavoro Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | Company report | 85% |
| Cresud Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sadot Group Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Bunge Global Sa's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Bunge Global Sa's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Soybean Processing and Refining 48.07 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Ag Services and Oilseeds 78.11 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Feed Ingredients 66.67 % |
| Chs Inc | Grains 48.90 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Bunge Global Sa's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 19,122 | 2,749,059 | 34,088 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 34,107 | 2,025,786 | 60,006 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 8,144 | 436,578 | 40,417 |
| Cresud Inc | 540 | 310,013 | 76,088 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 77 | 58,734,000 | 5,871,000 |
| Sadot Group Inc | 3 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 42,872 | 1,766,998 | 44,565 |
Bunge Global Sa's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Darling Ingredients Inc | North America 58.21 % |
| Chs Inc | North America 96.17 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Bunge Global Sa's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 38 companies in Bunge Global Sa's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Bunge Global Sa ranks #3 of 38 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 13.21 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,553, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nutrien Ltd | 35,131 | 24.11 % |
| 2 | Archer daniels midland Co | 34,178 | 23.46 % |
| 3 | Bunge Global Sa | 19,249 | 13.21 % |
| 4 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 18,248 | 12.53 % |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Mosaic Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Icl Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Scotts Miracle gro Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Seaboard Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Andersons Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Bunge Global Sa's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-05.
Bunge Global Sa's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nutrien Ltd | 35,131 | 33.77 % |
| 2 | Archer daniels midland Co | 34,178 | 18.85 % |
| 3 | Bunge Global Sa | 19,249 | 4.77 % |
| 4 | Cf Industries Holdings inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 5 | Darling Ingredients Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Mosaic Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Icl Group Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Scotts Miracle gro Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Bunge Global Sa's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-05. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Bunge Global Sa's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Agricultural Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (68 companies). See the full Agricultural Production industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 5.12 % | 15.30 % (avg) | -10.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | 3.10 % | 1.88 % (avg) | +1.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.82 % | 4.90 % (avg) | -3.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Bunge Global Sa's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Agricultural Production industry average (68 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Agricultural Production industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.0x | 18.7x | +0.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.6x | 9.9x | +2.7x |
| P/B | 1.3x | 1.9x | -0.7x |
| Return on Equity | 6.63 % | industry aggregate | 0.26 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -2.59 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Bunge Global Sa's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -10.13 % | -23.98 % | 7.30 % | -0.11 % | -10.06 % | -11.44 % | -10.80 % | 32.43 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.63 % | 2.97 % | 0.72 % | 1.79 % | -2.23 % | 5.26 % | 3.04 % | 1.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.87 % | 7.15 % | 1.61 % | 4.00 % | -4.96 % | 11.51 % | 5.84 % | 3.39 % |
| P/E | 27.4x | 13.0x | 79.7x | 36.2x | - | 7.1x | 11.0x | 16.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Bunge Global Sa's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Bunge Global Sa falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.55x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 4.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Bunge Global Sa's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,553 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.82 % vs industry average 4.90 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Bunge Global Sa's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Bunge Global Sa's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Bunge Global Sa falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Bunge Global Sa's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Bunge Global Sa's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 0.05 | 1.57 | 0.87 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 0.36 | 1.38 | 0.36 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 0.13 | 1.54 | 1.01 |
| Cresud Inc | 0.25 | 1.24 | 0.36 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 1.02 | 5.30 | - |
| Sadot Group Inc | 0.01 | 0.29 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bunge Global Sa's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Q3 2026 | +7.4 % | +75.7 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q3 2026 | +9.6 % | +646.4 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +2,628.8 % |
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | -54.4 % | -27.9 % |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | Q2 2026 | -8.4 % | -1.0 % |
| Sadot Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +13,912.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.7 % | +120.4 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Bunge Global Sa's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | Q3 2026 | +6.5 % | -18.1 % |
| Archer daniels midland Co | Q3 2026 | +7.1 % | +3.7 % |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | - |
| Cresud Inc | Q2 2025 | -52.2 % | -80.0 % |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | Q2 2026 | -8.4 % | - |
| Sadot Group Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
Bunge Global Sa's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 2.46% | 3.82% | 6.63% |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 4.59% | 7.51% | 10.71% |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 5.72% | 5.72% | 12.23% |
| Cresud Inc | 5.09% | 0.01% | 11.70% |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 30.77% | 32.42% | 21.68% |
| Sadot Group Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Bunge Global Sa's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Bunge Global Sa | 16.34 | 0.20 |
| Archer daniels midland Co | 13.71 | 0.41 |
| Darling Ingredients Inc | 13.63 | 1.24 |
| Cresud Inc | 0.09 | 0.61 |
| Golden Growers Cooperative | 13.16 | 1.32 |
| Sadot Group Inc | - | 0.01 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.93 | 0.28 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.