Ai Era's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ai Era (ABQQ) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ai Era vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8M vs 515,194M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-22.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-5.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ai Era generated -18.6% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 16.0% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -288.3% net margin compares with 27.2% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Ai Era accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.96M compares with $2.83M for the peer group (0.3x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ABQQ Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Ai Era reported revenue contraction of 18.61 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 16.04 %.
With a net margin of -288.25 %, Ai Era reported lower profitability than its competitors (27.21 %).
Ai Era generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Ai Era vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ai Era and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ai Era's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Conglomerates industry grew revenue 13.0% year over year, combined, vs -18.6% for Ai Era. Ai Era's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Ai Era's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (3) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ABQQ Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ABQQ Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ABQQ Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Netflix Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Nft Limited | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ai Era's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ai Era's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Ai Era Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | 0.00 | 7.71 |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446.36 | 466,823.00 |
| Netflix Inc | 295,009.80 | 48,370.76 |
| Nft Limited | 20.54 | 0.73 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,274,476.69 | 515,202.20 |
Sources: Ai Era Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ai Era Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ai Era's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Netflix | Named by the company | 85% |
| Apple | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amazon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nft Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ai Era's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ai Era's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | IP Segment 95.80 % |
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
| Netflix Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ai Era's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | 0 | 963,580 | -334,443 |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
| Netflix Inc | 295,010 | 3,023,173 | 853,103 |
| Nft Limited | 21 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,274,477 | 2,830,739 | 783,397 |
Ai Era's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 23 companies in Ai Era's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ai Era ranks #0 of 23 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 4,441, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rtx Corporation | 257,180 | 63.49 % |
| 2 | Honeywell International Inc | 67,432 | 16.65 % |
| 3 | Heico Corporation | 43,418 | 10.72 % |
| 4 | Interdigital Inc | 11,303 | 2.79 % |
| 5 | Solstice Advanced Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Standardaero Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Dolby Laboratories Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Digital Turbine Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Helen Of Troy Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Ai Era Corp | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ai Era's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-12-17.
Ai Era's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Conglomerates industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (24 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 78.20 % | 45.94 % (avg) | +32.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | 10.87 % | industry median | +3.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 75.45 % | 7.94 % (avg) | +67.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 3.77 % (avg) | -3.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ai Era's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -30.18 % | 81.90 % | -28.50 % | 89.29 % | - | 53.33 % | 132.49 % |
| Operating Margin | 38.47 % | -379.41 % | -60.55 % | 587.63 % | -151.33 % | -116.83 % | 14.79 % | 32.08 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 12.77 % | -50.32 % | -5.55 % | 28.07 % | -5.63 % | -69.96 % | 18.93 % | 37.91 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ai Era's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Ai Era's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Ai Era is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ai Era's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 4,441 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 3.77 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ai Era's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ai Era's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ai Era's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ai Era falls in the Medium attractiveness / High strength cell: Invest / Grow.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ai Era's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 112.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-22.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (33.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Rtx Corporation, holding 63.49 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-5.3% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ai Era's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.66 |
| Apple Inc | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Netflix Inc | 0.88 | 1.27 | 0.51 |
| Nft Limited | 0.46 | 17.13 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ai Era's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | Q2 2026 | +41.9 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +27.1 % |
| Netflix Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.4 % | +8.8 % |
| Nft Limited | Q4 2025 | -2.0 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +16.0 % | +24.9 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ai Era's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | Q2 2026 | -24.7 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.6 % | -29.1 % |
| Netflix Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.4 % | +40.3 % |
| Nft Limited | Q4 2025 | +0.0 % | - |
Ai Era's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | - | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 35.02% | 60.14% | 142.67% |
| Netflix Inc | 23.74% | 29.51% | 47.96% |
| Nft Limited | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ai Era's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ai Era Corp | - | 0.00 |
| Apple Inc | 38.90 | 10.67 |
| Netflix Inc | 21.79 | 6.10 |
| Nft Limited | - | 28.30 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 36.99 | 10.24 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.