Cyberark Software Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Cyberark Software Ltd (CYBR) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Cyberark Software Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,001M vs 605,259M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-14.5%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Cyberark Software Ltd generated 33.1% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs 10.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -9.3% net margin compares with 27.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Cyberark Software Ltd accounted for 0.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.6% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.61M compares with $0.40M for the peer group (1.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CYBR Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Cyberark Software Ltd reported revenue growth of 33.10 % year on year in Q4 2024, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 10.92 %.
With a net margin of -9.34 %, Cyberark Software Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (27.04 %).
Cyberark Software Ltd generated 0.77 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.64 % a year earlier.
Cyberark Software Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Cyberark Software Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Cyberark Software Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs 33.1% for Cyberark Software Ltd. Cyberark Software Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.27% to 0.31%, a gain of 0.04 percentage points.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (24) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CYBR Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CYBR Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rackspace Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Okta Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Preformed Line Products Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Pitney Bowes Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Cyberark Software Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Cyberark Software Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | 18,080.20 | 1,000.74 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,793,278.88 | 331,839.00 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,735,373.70 | 89,104.00 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 296,745.24 | 11,480.00 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 274,423.79 | 5,395.06 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 209,708.44 | 69,096.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 6,502,462.79 | 611,786.59 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Cyberark Software Ltd .
Sources: Cyberark Software Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Cyberark Software Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Delinea | Named by the company | 85% |
| NortonLifeLock, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Saviynt | Named by the company | 85% |
| Keyfactor | Named by the company | 85% |
| Palo Alto Networks | Named by the company | 85% |
| Broadcom Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hashi Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Okta | Named by the company | 85% |
| Thycotic Software Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Microsoft | Named by the company | 85% |
| SailPoint | Named by the company | 85% |
| BeyondTrust | Named by the company | 85% |
| HashiCorp, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| One Identity LLC | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oculus Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Cyberark Software Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Semiconductor Solutions 64.81 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Accenture Plc | Americas 49.30 % |
| Pitney Bowes Inc | SendTech Solutions 65.76 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Cyberark Software Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | 18,080 | 608,724 | -56,850 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,793,279 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,735,374 | 2,700,121 | 1,159,545 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 296,745 | 523,699 | 14,005 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 274,424 | 504,306 | 7,166 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 209,708 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 6,484,383 | 398,977 | 125,292 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Cyberark Software Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | US 50.30 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Asia Pacific 60.15 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | United States 61.76 % |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | United States 66.86 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Cyberark Software Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 235 companies in Cyberark Software Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Cyberark Software Ltd ranks #0 of 235 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,652, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,767,678 | 50.21 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 480,175 | 6.40 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 389,514 | 5.19 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 275,412 | 3.67 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Cyberark Software Ltd | 18,041 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Cyberark Software Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-02-09.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,652 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Cyberark Software Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Cyberark Software Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Cyberark Software Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.21 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-14.5% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | 0.65 | 1.48 | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.99 | 2.05 | 0.75 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.30 | 0.91 | 0.04 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.21 | 1.67 | 0.16 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | Q4 2024 | +33.1 % | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.5 % | +216.1 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +34.4 % | - |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +25.9 % | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +20.6 % | +47.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Cyberark Software Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | Q4 2024 | +33.5 % | +123.5 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +74.0 % | +274.6 % |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | Q2 2026 | +62.9 % | +19.4 % |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +20.6 % | +222.1 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
Cyberark Software Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | - | - | - |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Broadcom Inc | 21.57% | 24.07% | 43.74% |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.87% | 0.81% | 1.71% |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.69% | 1.09% | 1.67% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Cyberark Software Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Cyberark Software Ltd | - | 18.07 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.35 | 11.43 |
| Broadcom Inc | 45.24 | 19.48 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc | 792.67 | 25.85 |
| Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 4,203.84 | 50.87 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 19.49 | 3.04 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 33.92 | 10.63 |
Sign in to see all peers for Cyberark Software Ltd .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.