Canon Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Canon Inc (CAJ) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Canon Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 30,371M vs 196,165M combined for tracked competitors (13.4% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+60.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Canon Inc generated 6.0% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2022, vs 21.7% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.5% net margin compares with 9.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Canon Inc accounted for 27.9% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 30.8% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.16M compares with $0.38M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CAJ Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2022
Canon Inc reported revenue growth of 5.99 % year on year in Q4 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 21.69 %.
With a net margin of 6.45 %, Canon Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (9.89 %).
Canon Inc generated 27.89 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 30.76 % a year earlier.
Canon Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Canon Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (11) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Canon Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Consumer Electronics industry grew revenue -0.5% year over year, combined, vs 6.0% for Canon Inc. Canon Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 13.40% to 14.28%, a gain of 0.88 percentage points.
Canon Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (14) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (15) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CAJ Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CAJ Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vaso Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Asml Holding Nv | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Varex Imaging Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Fonar Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Hp inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Canon Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Canon Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The principal elements of competition that Canon faces in each of its markets are technology, quality, reliability, performance, price and customer service and support. Canon believes that its ability to compete effectively depends in large part on conducting successful research and development activities that enable it to create new or improved products and release them on a timely basis and at commercially attractive prices.
The markets for this segment are highly competitive. Canon’s primary competitors are Xerox Corporation/Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.; Ricoh Company, Ltd.; Konica Minolta Inc.; HP Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; and Lexmark International, Inc. Canon believes that it is one of the leading global manufacturers of office MFDs, copying machines and laser printers. In addition to the general elements of competition described above, Canon’s ability to compete successfully in these markets also depends significantly on whether it can provide effective, broad-based “business solutions” to its customers and respond to interrelated customer needs. In particular, the ability to provide equipment and software that connect effectively to networks (ranging in scope from local area networks to the Internet and the cloud) is often a key to Canon’s competitive strength. In the United States, Europe and Japan, Canon is one of the market leaders in all areas of the business machine market. In emerging markets, for example in China, the current market leaders for business machines are Toshiba TEC Corporation, Sharp Corporation and Konica Minolta Inc. Canon hopes to join this group by introducing products tailored to the Chinese market and by strengthening sales and service channels.
Canon has continued to invest aggressively in competitive new products and intends to maintain its position in this market.
Canon’s primary competitors in the interchangeable lens digital camera market are Nikon Corporation and Sony Corporation.
Average prices for compact digital cameras in the industry increased in 2015 from the previous year. Market contraction is having a major impact, resulting in severe conditions in the digital camera market. Despite these difficulties, Canon will seek to take advantage of its status as the major brand in the industry, along with its economies of scale, in order to maintain profitability.
Canon’s primary competitors in the compact digital camera market are Sony
Corporation; Nikon Corporation; and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Canon’s
primary competitors in the digital video camcorder market are Sony Corporation;
Panasonic Corporation; and JVC Kenwood Corporation. Canon’s primary competitors
in the inkjet printer market are HP Inc. and Seiko Epson Corporation.
Very stiff competition continues in the markets for lithography equipment used
in the production of semiconductor devices and flat panel displays (“FPDs”).
In order to produce lithography equipment that can provide ultra-fine processing,
an integration of advanced optical, control and system technologies is required,
along with continuous investment in technology development. The main competitors
in these markets are Nikon Corporation, in the markets for semiconductor and
FPD lithography equipment, and ASML Holding N.V., in the market for semiconductor
lithography equipment only.
Canon believes that it has helped its customers improve their productivity by
continuously improving the cost performance of semiconductor lithography equipment
using the i-line and KrF laser light sources. In particular, equipment using
i-line has captured a large share of the global market, satisfying the needs
of image sensor manufacturers by quickly adapting to various unique specifications
through “design-in”.
Canon believes its FPD lithography equipment with a common platform offers excellent
productivity and reliability that has helped it capture market share of the
industry-leading South Korean market and the growing Chinese market. Canon’s
sales and service support systems have also received high accolades from the
customers in these markets. In the trend of high-definition, such as 4K displays
in the panel market, Canon believes it has also been meeting the needs of panel
makers by continuously offering new products with high resolution.
As for network cameras, the market is competitive in higher functional requirement
and price pressure from customers. Canon’s primary competitors are Hikvision
Digital Technology Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Corporation. Canon is developing
the innovative technology to continue to be a global market leader in this industry.
Publicly Traded Peers of Canon Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | 22,300.12 | 30,370.98 |
| Asml Holding Nv | 688,901.35 | 36,586.96 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,356.66 | 69,096.00 |
| Hp inc | 29,033.64 | 59,162.00 |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | 24,168.46 | 19,974.08 |
| Plantronics Inc. | 1,729.74 | 1,665.53 |
| SUBTOTAL | 979,147.06 | 228,201.39 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Canon Inc.
Sources: Canon Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Canon Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Canon Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Varex Imaging Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cloudastructure Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Eastman Kodak Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Gopro Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Butterfly Network Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dss Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Onto Innovation Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Commonwealth Income and Growth Fund Vii Lp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Intevac Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Xerox Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sharp Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Seiko Epson Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ricoh Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung Electronics Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Panasonic Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fuji Xerox Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nikon Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hikvision Digital Technology Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ultratech Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lexmark International | Named by the company | 85% |
| Toshiba TEC Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| JVC Kenwood Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Konica Minolta Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sony Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Applied Uv Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vaso Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Canon Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Canon Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Hp inc | Commercial PS 53.74 % |
| Ncr Voyix Corporation | Retail 70.46 % |
| Varex Imaging Corporation | Medical 63.66 % |
| Vaso Corporation | Professional Sales Service Segments 93.81 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Canon Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | 22,300 | 156,430 | 10,092 |
| Asml Holding Nv | 688,901 | 827,591 | 243,447 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,357 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| Hp inc | 29,034 | 1,075,673 | 44,564 |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | 24,168 | 291,938 | 14,684 |
| Plantronics Inc. | 1,730 | 475,866 | 6,183 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 956,847 | 383,060 | 47,350 |
Canon Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Asml Holding Nv | Rest of Europe and Middle East 1.43 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
| Hp inc | Americas 40.65 % |
| Ncr Voyix Corporation | United States 61.88 % |
| Varex Imaging Corporation | Other Countries 39.43 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Canon Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Canon Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | 0.27 | 1.58 | 0.09 |
| Asml Holding Nv | - | 1.26 | 0.22 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
| Hp inc | 0.03 | 0.78 | - |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | 0.37 | 1.30 | 0.64 |
| Plantronics Inc. | 0.35 | 1.53 | 225.35 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Canon Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | Q4 2022 | +6.0 % | +4.1 % |
| Asml Holding Nv | Q4 2025 | +15.6 % | +26.9 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +12.5 % | -13.4 % |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | Q4 2025 | -1.0 % | - |
| Plantronics Inc. | Q2 2022 | -3.6 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.5 % | +33.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Canon Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | Q4 2022 | +7.9 % | -1.8 % |
| Asml Holding Nv | Q4 2025 | +11.9 % | -21.7 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +14.9 % | -13.0 % |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | Q4 2025 | -4.6 % | -15.1 % |
| Plantronics Inc. | Q2 2022 | -3.3 % | +17.8 % |
Canon Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | 5.10% | 6.56% | 7.77% |
| Asml Holding Nv | 19.00% | 36.53% | 49.00% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
| Hp inc | 5.69% | 22.60% | - |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | 3.33% | 3.91% | 8.16% |
| Plantronics Inc. | 0.98% | 1.27% | 325.17% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Canon Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Canon Inc | 11.38 | 0.73 |
| Asml Holding Nv | 71.69 | 18.83 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 19.55 | 3.04 |
| Hp inc | 12.00 | 0.49 |
| Koninklijke Philips Nv | 27.00 | 1.21 |
| Plantronics Inc. | 81.29 | 1.04 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 37.07 | 4.29 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
