Hp Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Hp Inc (HPQ) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Hp Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 59,162M vs 1,482,480M combined for its competitors (3.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Hp Inc generated 12.5% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 12.8% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 4.2% net margin compares with 20.9% for the peer group.
- Scale: Hp Inc ranks #9 of 15 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Hardware industry, holding 0.4% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Hp Inc accounted for 4.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 4.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.08M compares with $0.57M for the peer group (1.9x).
- Structure: Hp Inc operates in the following segments: Commercial PS, Supplies, Consumer PS, Commercial Printing, Consumer Printing.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
HPQ Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Hp Inc reported revenue growth of 12.53 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.78 %.
With a net margin of 4.22 %, Hp Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (20.86 %).
Hp Inc generated 4.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 4.02 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Hp Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Hp Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Hp Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Hp Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Computer Hardware industry grew revenue 27.7% year over year, combined, vs 12.5% for Hp Inc. Hp Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 7.38% to 6.50%, a loss of 0.88 percentage points.
Hp Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (44) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
HPQ Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
HPQ Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
HPQ Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
HPQ Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dell Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Fastly Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Intel Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Aspen Technology inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Varonis Systems Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Hp Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Hp Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Hp inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Hp inc |
26,382.42 | 59,162.00 |
 Apple Inc |
5,039,791.17 | 478,834.00 |
 Microsoft Corporation |
3,950,922.06 | 346,445.00 |
 Oracle Corporation |
348,300.00 | 73,266.00 |
 Intel Corporation |
298,677.96 | 59,892.00 |
 Sap Se |
274,303.75 | 41,606.87 |
| SUBTOTAL | 11,245,801.54 | 1,847,157.63 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Hp inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Hp inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Hp Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Hp Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Logitech International S.A. | Company report | 85% |
| Taoweave Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Apple Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Toshiba Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| ASUSTeK Computer Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Microsoft Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Acer Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Lenovo Group Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Dell Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| OBLG | Company report | 85% |
| Semtech Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Audiocodes ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Xerox Holdings Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Hp inc | Company report | 85% |
| Ncr Voyix Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Pc Connection Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Nutanix Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Turtle Beach Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Qualcomm Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Intel Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Canon Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Adtran Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Rapid7 Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Plantronics Inc. | Company report | 85% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Commvault Systems Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Hp Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Hp Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Hp inc | Commercial PS 53.74 % |
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Agents and Infra 83.22 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| Intel Corporation | Client Computing and Physical AI Group 49.03 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.63 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Hp Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | 26,382 | 1,075,673 | 44,564 |
| Apple Inc | 5,039,791 | 2,867,269 | 791,467 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,950,922 | 1,553,565 | 639,601 |
| Oracle Corporation | 348,300 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| Intel Corporation | 298,678 | 703,784 | -144,853 |
| Sap Se | 274,304 | 378,244 | 75,299 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 11,219,419 | 574,583 | 116,033 |
Hp Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Hp inc | Americas 40.65 % |
| Apple Inc | Other countries 47.76 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 53.60 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 50.14 % |
| Dell Technologies Inc | United States 55.61 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Hp Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 15 companies in Hp Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Hp Inc ranks #9 of 15 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.44 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 7,163, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple Inc | 5,037,864 | 84.39 % |
| 2 | International Business Machines Corporation | 233,550 | 3.91 % |
| 3 | Dell Technologies Inc | 214,202 | 3.59 % |
| 4 | Sandisk Corporation | 129,434 | 2.17 % |
| 5 | Seagate Technology Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Western Digital Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Netapp Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hp inc | 26,382 | 0.44 % |
| 10 | Super Micro Computer Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Hp Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-06.
Hp Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Sandisk Corporation | 129,434 | 308.18 % |
| 5 | Seagate Technology Holdings Plc | 105,567 | 76.18 % |
| 6 | Western Digital Corporation | 101,028 | 72.14 % |
| 7 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 64,872 | 95.26 % |
| 8 | Netapp Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Hp inc | 26,382 | 11.52 % |
| 10 | Super Micro Computer Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Omnicell inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 12 | Zepp Health Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Quantum Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | One Stop Systems Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Hp Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Hp Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Computer Hardware industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (25 companies). See the full Computer Hardware industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.87 % | 27.50 % (avg) | -7.6 pp |
| Operating Margin | 5.45 % | industry median | -1.6 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.25 % | 8.85 % (avg) | -0.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 2.21 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Hp Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Computer Hardware industry average (25 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Computer Hardware industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 8.5x | 30.5x | -22.0x |
| EV / EBITDA | 6.4x | 19.0x | -12.6x |
| P/B | -88.4x | 7.4x | -95.8x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | 30.36 % | 6.53 % (avg) | 23.83 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Hp Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 8.86 % | 0.00 % | -1.70 % | 16.92 % | -9.83 % | -11.11 % | 1.51 % | 4.36 % |
| Operating Margin | 6.85 % | 6.50 % | 6.79 % | 8.88 % | 6.64 % | 6.80 % | 6.92 % | 5.49 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 54.68 % | 56.35 % | 63.09 % | 108.00 % | 59.09 % | 59.80 % | 61.69 % | 41.18 % |
| P/E | 8.6x | 10.2x | 9.7x | 5.5x | 11.6x | 8.2x | 13.0x | 9.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Hp Inc's Strategic Group Map
Hp Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Hp Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 8.1% and operating margin of 5.5% compares with an average of 7.2% growth and 11.7% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Hp Inc sits above that peer average on growth and below it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Hp Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Hp Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.01x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 9.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Apple Inc alone holds 84% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Hp Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 7,163 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Hp Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Hp Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Hp Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Hp Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+6.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.01x).
Opportunities
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (8.5x vs 30.5x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Apple Inc , holding 84.39 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Hp Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | 0.03 | 0.78 | - |
| Apple Inc | 0.27 | 1.02 | 0.88 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.16 | 1.27 | 0.10 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| Intel Corporation | 0.50 | 2.02 | 0.40 |
| Sap Se | 0.47 | 1.16 | 0.10 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Hp Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +12.5 % | -13.4 % |
| Apple Inc | Q3 2026 | +11.7 % | +11.8 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q3 2026 | +18.8 % | +32.0 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| Intel Corporation | Q3 2026 | +20.9 % | -22.2 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +12.5 % | +143.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +15.3 % | +31.2 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Hp Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +14.9 % | -13.0 % |
| Apple Inc | Q3 2026 | +10.2 % | -30.8 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q3 2026 | +23.6 % | +103.0 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| Intel Corporation | Q3 2026 | +11.6 % | +65.9 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +9.6 % | - |
Hp Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | 5.69% | 22.60% | - |
| Apple Inc | 34.37% | 57.35% | 127.61% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 20.01% | 23.87% | 34.15% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| Intel Corporation | - | - | - |
| Sap Se | 10.03% | 12.84% | 15.66% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Hp Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Hp inc | 10.90 | 0.45 |
| Apple Inc | 38.21 | 10.53 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 27.71 | 11.40 |
| Oracle Corporation | 18.20 | 4.75 |
| Intel Corporation | - | 4.99 |
| Sap Se | 38.27 | 6.59 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 30.94 | 6.09 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.