Terex's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Terex (TEX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Terex vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6,677M vs 243,341M combined for tracked competitors (2.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+34.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+8.1%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Terex generated 50.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 12.6% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 4.9% net margin compares with 12.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Terex ranks #4 of 20 companies by market capitalization in the Construction & Mining Machinery industry, holding 1.5% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Terex accounted for 3.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 2.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.62M compares with $0.52M for the peer group (1.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TEX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Terex reported revenue growth of 50.50 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.62 %.
With a net margin of 4.92 %, Terex reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.44 %).
Terex generated 3.29 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 2.48 % a year earlier.
Terex vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Terex and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Terex's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Construction & Mining Machinery industry grew revenue 6.1% year over year, combined, vs 50.5% for Terex. Terex's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.74% to 3.89%, a gain of 1.15 percentage points.
Terex's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| Competitors combined (19) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TEX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TEX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TEX Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TEX Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Manitowoc Company Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Caterpillar Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Custom Truck One Source Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Deere and Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Cummins Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Terex's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Terex's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We face a competitive global manufacturing market for all of our products. We compete with other manufacturers based on many factors, particularly price, performance and product reliability. We generally operate under a best value strategy, where we attempt to offer our customers products that are designed to improve the customer’s return on invested capital. However, in some instances, customers may prefer the pricing, performance or reliability aspects of a competitor’s product despite our product pricing or performance. We do not have a single competitor across all business segments. The following table shows the primary competitors for our products in the following categories:
Aerial Work Platforms Portable Material Lifts and Portable Aerial Work Platforms Oshkosh (JLG), Vestil,Sumner
Boom Lifts Oshkosh (JLG), Haulotte, Linamar (Skyjack), Xtreme/Tanfield (Snorkel) and Aichi
Scissor Lifts Oshkosh (JLG), Linamar (Skyjack), Haulotte, Manitou and Xtreme/Tanfield (Snorkel)
Telehandlers Oshkosh (JLG, Skytrak, Caterpillar and Lull brands), JCB, CNH, Merlo and Manitou (Gehl)
Trailer-mounted Light Towers Allmand Bros., Magnum and Doosan
Bridge Inspection Equipment Moog USA and Barin
Construction Material Handlers Liebherr, Sennebogen, Linkbelt, Exodus and Caterpillar Wheel Loaders Caterpillar, Volvo, Kubota, Kawasaki, John Deere, Komatsu, Hitachi, CNH, Liebherr and Doosan
Loader Backhoes Caterpillar, CNH, JCB, Komatsu, Volvo, John Deere and Mahindra
Mini Excavators Doosan (Bobcat), Yanmar, Volvo, Takeuchi, IHI, CNH, Caterpillar, John Deere, Neuson and Kubota Midi Excavators Komatsu, Hitachi, Volvo and Yanmar Site Dumpers Thwaites, Wacker Neuson and AUSA
Skid Steer Loaders Doosan (Bobcat), Caterpillar, CNH, John Deere, Takeuchi, Manitou (Gehl), Volvo and Kubota
Compact Track Loaders Doosan (Bobcat), Caterpillar, CNH, John Deere, Takeuchi, Volvo and Manitou (Gehl)
Compaction Equipment Bomag, Hamm, JCB and Ammann
Concrete Pavers Gomaco, Wirtgen, Power Curbers and Guntert & Zimmerman
Concrete Mixer Trucks Oshkosh, Kimble and Continental Manufacturing
Cranes Mobile Telescopic Cranes Liebherr, Manitowoc (Grove), Tadano-Faun, Sumitomo (Link-Belt), XCMG, Kato, Zoomlion and Sany Tower Cranes Liebherr, Manitowoc (Potain), Comansa, Zoomlion, Sany, XCMG and Wolffkran Lattice
Boom Crawler Cranes Manitowoc, Sumitomo (Link-Belt), Liebherr, Hitachi, Kobelco, XCMG, Zoomlion, Fushun and Sany
Lattice Boom Truck Cranes Liebherr Truck-Mounted Cranes Manitowoc (National Crane), Altec and Manitex
Utility Equipment Altec and Time Manufacturing
Material Handling & Port Solutions Industrial Cranes Konecranes, Columbus McKinnon, ABUS, Kito, GH and OMIS Mobile Harbor Cranes and Automated Port Technology Liebherr, Konecranes, Cargotec (Kalmar), Zhenua Port Machinery (ZPMC) and Künz
Reach Stackers Cargotec (Kalmar), Hyster, Konecranes (SMV), Taylor, Dalian, CVS Ferrari, Liebherr and Sany Straddle and Sprinter Carriers Cargotec (Kalmar), CVS Ferrari, Konecranes and Liebherr
Rubber Tired and Rail Mounted Gantry Cranes Zhenua Port Machinery (ZPMC), Liebherr, Konecranes, Cargotec (Kalmar), Doosan, Hyundai and Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding
Ship-to-Shore Gantry Cranes Zhenua Port Machinery (ZPMC), Liebherr, Konecranes, Cargotec (Kalmar), Samsung, Doosan, Hyundai and Mitsui Engineering & Shipbuilding
Empty Container Handlers, Full Container Handlers and General Cargo Lift Trucks Cargotec (Kalmar), Hyster, Linde, CVS Ferrari, Konecranes (SMV), Svetruck and Sany Materials Processing Crushing Equipment Metso, Astec Industries, Sandvik, McCloskey, Komatsu and Kleemann Screening Equipment Metso, Astec Industries, McCloskey and Sandvik Washing systems McLanahan, Astec Industries, CDE Global and GreyStone
Chippers Vermeer, Bandit and Morbark
Publicly Traded Peers of Terex Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | 6,338.10 | 6,677.00 |
| Caterpillar Inc | 379,226.88 | 74,729.00 |
| Deere and Co | 186,672.01 | 47,983.00 |
| Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583.35 | 22,209.90 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 89,433.73 | 18,637.00 |
| Cummins Inc | 71,720.84 | 34,708.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 973,871.13 | 276,810.04 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Terex Corporation.
Sources: Terex Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Terex Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Terex's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Linamar (Skyjack) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Metso | Named by the company | 85% |
| Posi+ | Named by the company | 85% |
| Columbus Mckinnon Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Time Manufacturing | Named by the company | 85% |
| Astec/Telestack | Named by the company | 85% |
| Xtreme/Tanfield (Snorkel) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Deere (Kleeman) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Eggersmann | Named by the company | 85% |
| Komptech | Named by the company | 85% |
| Matec | Named by the company | 85% |
| Phoenix Process Equipment | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sumner | Named by the company | 85% |
| Altec | Named by the company | 85% |
| Weir/Trio | Named by the company | 85% |
| CDE Global | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dur-A-Lift | Named by the company | 85% |
| Jenz | Named by the company | 85% |
| Manitou | Named by the company | 85% |
| Morbark | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rubble Master | Named by the company | 85% |
| The Manitowoc Company Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vermeer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Azfab | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dingli | Named by the company | 85% |
| Haulotte | Named by the company | 85% |
| LGMG | Named by the company | 85% |
| McLanahan | Named by the company | 85% |
| Portafill | Named by the company | 85% |
| Superior | Named by the company | 85% |
| Astec Industries | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wesco | Named by the company | 85% |
| CNH | Named by the company | 85% |
| Edg | Named by the company | 85% |
| Keestrack | Named by the company | 85% |
| Manitou (Gehl) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oshkosh (JLG) | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sandvik | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aichi | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vestil | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Terex's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Terex's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | Aerials 27.05 % |
| Caterpillar Inc | Construction Industries 41.12 % |
| Deere and Co | Production and Precision Agriculture Segment 34.50 % |
| Emerson Electric Co | Safety and Productivity 11.33 % |
| Cummins Inc | Distribution 35.17 % |
| United Rentals Inc | General Rentals 67.33 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Terex's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | 6,338 | 624,019 | 13,925 |
| Caterpillar Inc | 379,227 | 633,297 | 91,873 |
| Deere and Co | 186,672 | 656,402 | 66,498 |
| Trane Technologies Plc | 100,583 | 504,770 | 67,557 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 89,434 | 255,301 | 35,329 |
| Cummins Inc | 71,721 | 514,955 | 41,944 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 967,533 | 516,265 | 56,930 |
Terex's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | North America 77.97 % |
| Caterpillar Inc | Latin America -0.11 % |
| Deere and Co | US 53.84 % |
| Trane Technologies Plc | Americas 80.46 % |
| Cummins Inc | United States 56.10 % |
| Dover Corp | United States 55.59 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Terex's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 19 companies in Terex's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Terex ranks #4 of 19 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.52 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 7,977, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar Inc | 379,426 | 89.17 % |
| 2 | Cnh Industrial N v | 16,170 | 3.80 % |
| 3 | Applied Industrial Technologies Inc | 12,652 | 2.97 % |
| 4 | Terex Corporation | 6,463 | 1.52 % |
| 5 | Blue Bird Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Distribution Solutions Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Astec Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Douglas Dynamics Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Aebi Schmidt Holding Ag | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | The Manitowoc Company Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Terex's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Terex's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Caterpillar Inc | 379,426 | 76.91 % |
| 2 | Cnh Industrial N v | 16,170 | 20.65 % |
| 3 | Applied Industrial Technologies Inc | 12,652 | 28.99 % |
| 4 | Terex Corporation | 6,463 | 11.77 % |
| 5 | Blue Bird Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Distribution Solutions Group Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Astec Industries Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Douglas Dynamics Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Aebi Schmidt Holding Ag | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Terex's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Terex's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction & Mining Machinery industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (24 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.67 % | 21.59 % (avg) | -3.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | 5.72 % | industry median | +1.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.56 % | 6.52 % (avg) | +3.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 10.24 % (avg) | -10.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Terex's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Construction & Mining Machinery industry average (24 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 32.8x | 27.8x | +4.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.9x | 15.2x | +0.7x |
| P/B | 2.1x | 2.0x | +0.1x |
| Return on Equity | 4.30 % | industry aggregate | -24.81 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.53 % | -0.10 % (avg) | 3.63 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Terex's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 17.45 % | -15.06 % | -29.33 % | 26.34 % | 15.80 % | 14.45 % | -0.48 % | 5.73 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.72 % | 7.70 % | 2.22 % | 8.44 % | 9.99 % | 12.36 % | 10.26 % | 8.76 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.97 % | 10.26 % | 2.20 % | 10.52 % | 14.30 % | 16.57 % | 10.45 % | 6.96 % |
| P/E | 20.7x | 37.7x | - | 14.5x | 9.3x | 7.1x | 10.1x | 15.7x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Terex's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Terex's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Terex is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Terex's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Terex's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Terex falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 8.9% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Caterpillar Inc alone holds 89% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Terex's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 7,977 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 10.24 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Terex's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Terex's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Terex's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Terex falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Terex's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+34.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 24.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (36.80 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Caterpillar Inc, holding 89.17 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Terex's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | 0.34 | 1.99 | 0.96 |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.19 | 1.39 | 0.99 |
| Deere and Co | 0.29 | 1.17 | 1.03 |
| Trane Technologies Plc | 0.06 | 1.15 | 0.54 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 0.05 | 0.88 | 0.65 |
| Cummins Inc | 0.19 | 1.76 | 0.64 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Terex's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | Q2 2026 | +50.5 % | +52.8 % |
| Caterpillar Inc | Q2 2026 | +24.0 % | +64.9 % |
| Deere and Co | Q2 2026 | +4.9 % | +8.3 % |
| Trane Technologies Plc | Q2 2026 | +10.6 % | +6.4 % |
| Emerson Electric Co | Q2 2026 | +7.0 % | +22.5 % |
| Cummins Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.4 % | +4.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +12.7 % | +19.0 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Terex's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | Q2 2026 | +52.2 % | - |
| Caterpillar Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.3 % | +16.3 % |
| Deere and Co | Q2 2026 | +214.9 % | -14.2 % |
| Trane Technologies Plc | Q2 2026 | +14.2 % | -15.0 % |
| Emerson Electric Co | Q2 2026 | +2.7 % | +9.7 % |
| Cummins Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.9 % | +7.8 % |
Terex's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | 1.82% | 2.03% | 4.30% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 11.11% | 17.90% | 54.18% |
| Deere and Co | 4.56% | 5.80% | 18.12% |
| Trane Technologies Plc | 13.29% | 18.86% | 34.76% |
| Emerson Electric Co | 6.13% | 8.71% | 12.69% |
| Cummins Inc | 8.21% | 10.31% | 21.02% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Terex's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Terex Corporation | 28.32 | 0.95 |
| Caterpillar Inc | 35.33 | 5.07 |
| Deere and Co | 38.33 | 3.89 |
| Trane Technologies Plc | 34.27 | 4.53 |
| Emerson Electric Co | 34.88 | 4.80 |
| Cummins Inc | 26.45 | 2.07 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.53 | 3.52 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.