Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Pixie Dust Technologies Inc (PXDT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6M vs 466,823M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-22.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc generated 21.6% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs -4.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -198.9% net margin compares with 26.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PXDT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reported revenue growth of 21.63 % year on year in Q4 2024, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -4.31 %.
With a net margin of -198.86 %, Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (26.04 %).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.01 % a year earlier.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Pixie Dust Technologies Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry grew revenue 15.0% year over year, combined, vs 21.6% for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc. Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | - | - | - |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PXDT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PXDT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Pixie Dust Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | 8.33 | 6.30 |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446.36 | 466,823.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 4,979,454.69 | 466,829.30 |
Sources: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Pixie Dust Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Dictation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Google Assistant | Named by the company | 85% |
| TOPPAN | Named by the company | 85% |
| Otter | Named by the company | 85% |
| KONICA MINOLTA | Named by the company | 85% |
| XRAI Glasses | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dragon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Angfa | Named by the company | 85% |
| Notta | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | 8 | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 4,979,446 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-22.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | 3.81 | 4.88 | 0.73 |
| Apple Inc | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.99 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | Q1 2024 | +21.6 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +27.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +16.4 % | +27.1 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | Q1 2024 | - | +6.1 % |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.6 % | -29.1 % |
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 35.02% | 60.14% | 142.67% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | 1.32 |
| Apple Inc | 38.90 | 10.67 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 38.63 | 10.67 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.