Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Pixie Dust Technologies Inc (PXDT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 6M vs 478,834M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-24.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc generated 21.6% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs -4.3% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -198.9% net margin compares with 26.0% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Pixie Dust Technologies Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
PXDT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reported revenue growth of 21.63 % year on year in Q4 2024, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -4.31 %.
With a net margin of -198.86 %, Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (26.04 %).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc generated 0.01 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.01 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Pixie Dust Technologies Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry grew revenue 14.4% year over year, combined, vs 21.6% for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc. Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
PXDT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
PXDT Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Pixie Dust Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Pixie Dust Technologies Inc |
8.33 | 6.30 |
 Apple Inc |
5,244,403.42 | 478,834.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 5,244,411.75 | 478,840.30 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Pixie Dust Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Pixie Dust Technologies Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Dictation | Company report | 85% |
| KONICA MINOLTA | Company report | 85% |
| XRAI Glasses | Company report | 85% |
| Dragon | Company report | 85% |
| Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. | Company report | 85% |
| Angfa | Company report | 85% |
| Notta | Company report | 85% |
| Google Assistant | Company report | 85% |
| TOPPAN | Company report | 85% |
| Otter | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | 8 | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 5,244,403 | 2,867,269 | 791,467 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 5,244,403 | 2,867,269 | 791,467 |
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | Other countries 47.76 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (341 companies). See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 46.85 % (avg) | -46.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | - | industry median | - |
| EBITDA Margin | - | -6.47 % (avg) | - |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.11 % | 7.10 % (avg) | -6.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (341 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 37.0x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 17.4x | - |
| P/B | 7.6x | 4.6x | +3.0x |
| Return on Equity | -138.53 % | industry aggregate | -142.79 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -40.74 % | -6.54 % (avg) | -34.20 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.11 % vs industry average 7.10 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 142.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-24.2% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | 3.81 | 4.88 | 0.73 |
| Apple Inc | 0.27 | 1.02 | 0.88 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | Q1 2024 | +21.6 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q3 2026 | +11.7 % | +11.8 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.7 % | +11.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | Q1 2024 | - | +6.1 % |
| Apple Inc | Q3 2026 | +10.2 % | -30.8 % |
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 34.37% | 57.35% | 127.61% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Pixie Dust Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Pixie Dust Technologies Inc | - | 1.32 |
| Apple Inc | 39.76 | 10.95 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 39.68 | 10.95 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.