Nomadar's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nomadar (NOMA) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Nomadar vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+34.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Nomadar ranks #30 of 49 companies by market capitalization in the Movies and Entertainment industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Nomadar accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NOMA Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Nomadar generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Movies and Entertainment industry grew revenue 15.2% year over year, combined, vs 114.2% for Nomadar. Nomadar's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Nomadar's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nomadar Corp | No | - | - | - |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NOMA Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NOMA Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NOMA Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
Nomadar's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Nomadar's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| IMG Academy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Umbro | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chelsea Football Academy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nike | Named by the company | 85% |
| Adidas | Named by the company | 85% |
| La Masía | Named by the company | 85% |
| CR7 | Named by the company | 85% |
| Red Bull Athlete Development Program | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aspire Academy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Las Vegas Sphere | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Nomadar's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.