Nov Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nov Inc (NOV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Nov Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8,693M vs 267,564M combined for tracked competitors (3.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-3.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Nov Inc generated -2.4% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2026, vs 7.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 1.0% net margin compares with 9.4% for the peer group.
- Scale: Nov Inc ranks #14 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry, holding 1.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Nov Inc accounted for 3.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.28M compares with $0.47M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NOV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Nov Inc reported revenue contraction of 2.43 % year on year in Q1 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.28 %.
With a net margin of 0.97 %, Nov Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (9.42 %).
Nov Inc generated 3.07 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.37 % a year earlier.
Nov Inc vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Nov Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Nov Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry grew revenue 19.9% year over year, combined, vs -2.4% for Nov Inc. Nov Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 3.54% to 2.88%, a loss of 0.66 percentage points.
Nov Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Yes | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (34) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NOV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forum Energy Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Matson inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Nabors Industries Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Patterson uti Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Nov Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Nov Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The products of the Rig Technology segment are sold in highly competitive markets and its sales and earnings can be affected by competitive actions such as price changes, new product development, or improved availability and delivery. The segment’s primary competitors are Aker Solutions; American Electric Technologies; American Block; AXON Energy Products; Bentec (a division of Abbot Group); Bomco; Canrig (a division of Nabors Industries); Cavins Oil Well Tools; Cameron International; Coflexip (a division of Technip); Den-Con Tool Company; Forum Energy Technologies; General Electric; Global Energy Services; Hitec Products; Honghua; Huisman; Liebherr; Parveen Industries; Pason Systems; Omron Corporation; Rolls Royce; Siemens; Stewart & Stevenson; Soilmec and Drillmec (a part of the Trevi Group); Seatrax; Tesco Corporation; Wärtsilä and Weatherford International. Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting its Rig Technology segment are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of spare parts and consumables, breadth of product line and price.
Customers for the Petroleum Services & Supplies’ tubular products and services include major and independent oil and gas companies, national oil companies, drilling and workover contractors, oilfield equipment and product distributors and other manufacturers, oilfield service companies, steel mills, and other industrial companies. The Company’s competitors in tubular services include, among others, Baker Hughes; Drill Pipe Masters; Frank’s International; Future Pipe; Halliburton; Hanwei; Hilong; Patterson Tubular Services; Precision Tube (a division of Tenaris); ShawCor; Schlumberger; Superior Energy Services; Texas Steel Conversion; Vallourec & Mannesmann and Weatherford International. In addition, the Company competes with a number of smaller regional competitors in tubular inspection. Certain foreign jurisdictions and government-owned petroleum companies located in some of the countries in which the Company operates have adopted policies or regulations that may give local nationals in these countries certain competitive advantages. Within the Company’s corrosion control products, certain substitutes such as non-metallic tubulars, corrosion inhibitors, corrosion resistant alloys, cathodic protection systems, and non-metallic liner systems also compete with the Company’s products. Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting this business are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of products, spare parts and consumables, breadth of product line and price.
Publicly Traded Peers of Nov Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 7,098.00 | 8,693.00 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197.28 | 50,638.00 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,080.91 | 16,995.90 |
| Slb Limited | 77,543.94 | 36,365.00 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120.00 | 27,893.00 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 29,933.32 | 7,941.10 |
| SUBTOTAL | 766,372.70 | 280,118.87 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Nov Inc .
Sources: Nov Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Nov Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Nov Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cameron International | Named by the company | 85% |
| Parveen Industries | Named by the company | 85% |
| Weatherford International | Named by the company | 85% |
| Abbot Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| General Electric | Named by the company | 85% |
| Trevi Group | Named by the company | 85% |
| American Electric Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Den-Con Tool Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pason Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Superior Energy | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rig Technology | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nabors Industries | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hitec Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tesco Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| AXON Energy Products | Named by the company | 85% |
| Forum Energy Technologies | Named by the company | 85% |
| Omron Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aker Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oil States International Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Superior Drilling Products Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ncs Multistage Holdings Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Championx Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cactus inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Nov Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Nov Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Services and Rental 22.90 % |
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 72.90 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 50.05 % |
| Slb Limited | Production Systems 42.03 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Oilfield Services and Equipment 52.34 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Industrial Technologies and Services 79.17 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Nov Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 7,098 | 275,051 | 3,069 |
| General Electric Company | 333,197 | 888,386 | 157,579 |
| Ecolab Inc | 79,081 | 354,081 | 44,450 |
| Slb Limited | 77,544 | 333,624 | 28,899 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 57,120 | 498,089 | 56,304 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 29,933 | 378,148 | 46,000 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 759,275 | 473,271 | 40,343 |
Nov Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Slb Limited | Middle East 28.67 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | United States 39.51 % |
| Halliburton Company | North America 39.54 % |
| Dover Corp | United States 55.59 % |
| Jacobs Solutions Inc | United States 68.89 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Nov Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 55 companies in Nov Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Nov Inc ranks #14 of 55 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.34 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,210, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 125,873 | 23.49 % |
| 2 | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 91,960 | 17.16 % |
| 3 | Barrick Mining Corp | 70,072 | 13.07 % |
| 4 | Baker Hughes Company | 57,700 | 10.77 % |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rbc Bearings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Mueller Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Generac Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Crane Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Watts Water Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 14 | Nov Inc | 7,184 | 1.34 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Nov Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Nov Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Crane Company | 12,107 | 15.40 % |
| 10 | Watts Water Technologies Inc | 12,005 | 30.25 % |
| 11 | Valmont Industries Inc | 9,126 | 28.20 % |
| 12 | Timken Co | 8,239 | 58.43 % |
| 13 | Arcosa Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Nov Inc | 7,184 | 56.38 % |
| 15 | Enpro Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Weatherford International Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Solaris Energy Infrastructure Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Cactus inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 19 | Griffon Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Nov Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Nov Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (65 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 19.54 % | 29.68 % (avg) | -10.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 4.47 % | industry median | -6.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.95 % | 11.51 % (avg) | -3.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.10 % | 8.98 % (avg) | -4.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Nov Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry average (65 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 80.7x | 26.8x | +53.9x |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.8x | 14.2x | -3.4x |
| P/B | 1.1x | 3.7x | -2.6x |
| Return on Equity | 1.51 % | industry aggregate | -13.61 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.51 % | 5.40 % (avg) | -2.89 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Nov Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | -28.18 % | -9.29 % | 31.01 % | 18.60 % | 3.34 % | -1.42 % |
| Operating Margin | - | -74.05 % | -39.82 % | -2.43 % | 3.65 % | 7.58 % | 9.88 % | 5.65 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -27.52 % | -17.39 % | -1.03 % | 2.08 % | 4.65 % | 5.62 % | 3.16 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | 57.4x | 7.9x | 9.6x | 42.9x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Nov Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Nov Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Nov Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Nov Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Nov Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Nov Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.06x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.8% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Nov Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,210 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.10 % vs industry average 8.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Nov Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Nov Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Nov Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Nov Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Nov Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 6.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 13.6 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-5.6% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.06x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-3.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Nov Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 0.56 | 2.50 | 0.27 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.86 | 1.09 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.38 | 1.38 | 1.29 |
| Slb Limited | 0.20 | 1.37 | 0.38 |
| Baker Hughes Company | - | 1.58 | 0.46 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 0.57 | 1.98 | 0.59 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nov Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Q1 2026 | -2.4 % | -73.0 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +21.1 % | +16.6 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +13.5 % | +1.9 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | -22.2 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +2.5 % | +129.3 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +9.1 % | -0.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nov Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Q1 2026 | +1.0 % | -22.6 % |
| General Electric Company | Q2 2026 | +540.9 % | +2.4 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.1 % | +10.8 % |
| Slb Limited | Q2 2026 | +79.3 % | +29.0 % |
| Baker Hughes Company | Q1 2026 | +3.1 % | +12.0 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.6 % | -23.5 % |
Nov Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 0.86% | 1.06% | 1.51% |
| General Electric Company | 6.98% | 11.25% | 48.50% |
| Ecolab Inc | 8.24% | 9.11% | 21.51% |
| Slb Limited | 5.73% | 7.18% | 11.58% |
| Baker Hughes Company | 7.43% | 11.19% | 16.88% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 5.30% | 5.45% | 9.46% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Nov Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 81.25 | 0.82 |
| General Electric Company | 37.57 | 6.58 |
| Ecolab Inc | 37.59 | 4.65 |
| Slb Limited | 24.64 | 2.13 |
| Baker Hughes Company | 18.28 | 2.05 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 31.56 | 3.77 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.99 | 2.74 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.