Nov Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Nov Inc (NOV) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Nov Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 8,689M vs 228,193M combined for its competitors (3.7% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+5.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Nov Inc generated 2.3% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 9.8% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 4.0% net margin compares with 10.5% for the peer group.
- Scale: Nov Inc ranks #13 of 57 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry, holding 1.3% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Nov Inc accounted for 3.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.8% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.27M compares with $0.48M for the peer group (0.6x).
- Structure: Nov Inc operates in the following segments: Services and Rental, Aftermarket, Capital Equipment, Product Sales, Intersegment Revenue, Continental, Land and Offshore.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
NOV Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Nov Inc reported revenue growth of 2.30 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.83 %.
With a net margin of 4.04 %, Nov Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (10.48 %).
Nov Inc generated 3.56 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.81 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Nov Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Nov Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Nov Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (11) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Nov Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry grew revenue 19.0% year over year, combined, vs 2.3% for Nov Inc. Nov Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 3.50% to 3.01%, a loss of 0.49 percentage points.
Nov Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (34) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (17) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NOV Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
NOV Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forum Energy Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Matson inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Patterson uti Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Nov Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Nov Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
The products of the Rig Technology segment are sold in highly competitive markets and its sales and earnings can be affected by competitive actions such as price changes, new product development, or improved availability and delivery. The segment’s primary competitors are Aker Solutions; American Electric Technologies; American Block; AXON Energy Products; Bentec (a division of Abbot Group); Bomco; Canrig (a division of Nabors Industries); Cavins Oil Well Tools; Cameron International; Coflexip (a division of Technip); Den-Con Tool Company; Forum Energy Technologies; General Electric; Global Energy Services; Hitec Products; Honghua; Huisman; Liebherr; Parveen Industries; Pason Systems; Omron Corporation; Rolls Royce; Siemens; Stewart & Stevenson; Soilmec and Drillmec (a part of the Trevi Group); Seatrax; Tesco Corporation; Wärtsilä and Weatherford International. Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting its Rig Technology segment are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of spare parts and consumables, breadth of product line and price.
Customers for the Petroleum Services & Supplies’ tubular products and services include major and independent oil and gas companies, national oil companies, drilling and workover contractors, oilfield equipment and product distributors and other manufacturers, oilfield service companies, steel mills, and other industrial companies. The Company’s competitors in tubular services include, among others, Baker Hughes; Drill Pipe Masters; Frank’s International; Future Pipe; Halliburton; Hanwei; Hilong; Patterson Tubular Services; Precision Tube (a division of Tenaris); ShawCor; Schlumberger; Superior Energy Services; Texas Steel Conversion; Vallourec & Mannesmann and Weatherford International. In addition, the Company competes with a number of smaller regional competitors in tubular inspection. Certain foreign jurisdictions and government-owned petroleum companies located in some of the countries in which the Company operates have adopted policies or regulations that may give local nationals in these countries certain competitive advantages. Within the Company’s corrosion control products, certain substitutes such as non-metallic tubulars, corrosion inhibitors, corrosion resistant alloys, cathodic protection systems, and non-metallic liner systems also compete with the Company’s products. Management believes that the principal competitive factors affecting this business are performance, quality, reputation, customer service, availability of products, spare parts and consumables, breadth of product line and price.
Publicly Traded Peers of Nov Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Nov Inc |
6,364.80 | 8,689.00 |
 General Electric Company |
351,764.31 | 52,575.00 |
 Ecolab Inc |
86,331.06 | 17,679.70 |
 Slb Limited |
74,700.30 | 36,886.00 |
 Ingersoll Rand Inc |
33,322.27 | 8,051.80 |
 Dover Corp |
28,594.14 | 8,576.81 |
| SUBTOTAL | 734,412.94 | 285,617.68 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Nov Inc .
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Nov Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Nov Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Nov Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Cactus inc | Company report | 85% |
| Oil States International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Technipfmc Plc | Company report | 85% |
| Championx Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Superior Drilling Products Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Ncs Multistage Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Forum Energy Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Baker Hughes Company | Company report | 85% |
| Rig Technology | Company report | 85% |
| Nabors Industries | Company report | 85% |
| Parveen Industries | Company report | 85% |
| Weatherford International | Company report | 85% |
| AXON Energy Products | Company report | 85% |
| General Electric | Company report | 85% |
| Trevi Group | Company report | 85% |
| Aker Solutions | Company report | 85% |
| Cameron International | Company report | 85% |
| Pason Systems | Company report | 85% |
| Superior Energy | Company report | 85% |
| Abbot Group | Company report | 85% |
| Hitec Products | Company report | 85% |
| Tesco Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| American Electric Technologies | Company report | 85% |
| Den-Con Tool Company | Company report | 85% |
| Omron Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Noble Corporation Plc | Company report | 85% |
| Nextier Oilfield Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Transocean ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Expro Group Holdings N v | Company report | 85% |
| Helmerich and Payne inc | Company report | 85% |
| Innovex International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Rpc inc | Company report | 85% |
| Halliburton Company | Company report | 85% |
| Patterson uti Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Slb Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Koil Energy Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Helix Energy Solutions Group inc | Company report | 85% |
| Basic Energy Services Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Core Laboratories Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Enservco Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Lineage Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Vantage Drilling International | Company report | 85% |
| Independence Contract Drilling inc | Company report | 85% |
| Jacobs Solutions Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Tetra Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Npk International Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Nov Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Nov Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Services and Rental 23.00 % |
| General Electric Company | Commercial Engines and Services, Reportable 73.25 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Water Services 51.14 % |
| Slb Limited | Production Systems 42.33 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Industrial Technologies and Services 78.45 % |
| Dover Corp | Clean Energy & Fueling 27.13 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Nov Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 6,365 | 274,925 | 4,588 |
| General Electric Company | 351,764 | 922,368 | 159,930 |
| Ecolab Inc | 86,331 | 368,327 | 43,650 |
| Slb Limited | 74,700 | 338,404 | 28,541 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 33,322 | 383,419 | 66,195 |
| Dover Corp | 28,594 | 357,367 | 75,230 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 728,048 | 482,865 | 43,910 |
Nov Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Slb Limited | Middle East 29.71 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | United States 41.13 % |
| Dover Corp | United States 56.96 % |
| Halliburton Company | North America 37.87 % |
| Jacobs Solutions Inc | United States 68.89 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Nov Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Nov Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Nov Inc ranks #13 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.27 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,279, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parker hannifin Corporation | 122,380 | 24.59 % |
| 2 | Howmet Aerospace Inc | 88,587 | 17.80 % |
| 3 | Barrick Mining Corp | 69,236 | 13.91 % |
| 4 | Baker Hughes Company | 47,115 | 9.47 % |
| 5 | Technipfmc Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Rbc Bearings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Crane Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Mueller Industries Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Watts Water Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Generac Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 13 | Nov Inc | 6,306 | 1.27 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Nov Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-10.
Nov Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Mueller Industries Inc | 12,176 | -48.60 % |
| 9 | Watts Water Technologies Inc | 12,018 | 31.31 % |
| 10 | Generac Holdings Inc | 10,856 | 17.23 % |
| 11 | Valmont Industries Inc | 8,192 | 2.92 % |
| 12 | Timken Co | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Nov Inc | 6,306 | 15.75 % |
| 14 | Weatherford International Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Enpro Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Griffon Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Franklin Electric Co Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Solaris Energy Infrastructure Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Nov Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-10. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Nov Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (77 companies). See the full Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.73 % | 24.50 % (avg) | -3.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | 5.46 % | industry median | -7.8 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.77 % | 10.26 % (avg) | -0.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.86 % | 9.24 % (avg) | -5.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Nov Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry average (77 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Miscellaneous Fabricated Products industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 51.6x | 26.5x | +25.1x |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.1x | 12.6x | -3.5x |
| P/B | 1.2x | 3.7x | -2.5x |
| Return on Equity | 2.31 % | industry aggregate | -15.27 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 3.10 % | 4.67 % (avg) | -1.57 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Nov Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | -28.18 % | -9.29 % | 31.01 % | 18.60 % | 3.34 % | -1.42 % |
| Operating Margin | - | -74.05 % | -39.82 % | -2.43 % | 3.65 % | 7.58 % | 9.88 % | 5.65 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -27.52 % | -17.39 % | -1.03 % | 2.08 % | 4.65 % | 5.62 % | 3.16 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | 57.4x | 7.8x | 9.8x | 40.1x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Nov Inc's Strategic Group Map
Nov Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Nov Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -1.0% and operating margin of 5.5% compares with an average of -0.7% growth and 5.1% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Nov Inc sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Nov Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Nov Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.05x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Nov Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,279 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.86 % vs industry average 9.24 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Nov Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Nov Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Nov Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Nov Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 7.8 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 15.3 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.05x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Nov Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 0.54 | 2.45 | 0.28 |
| General Electric Company | - | 0.90 | 1.09 |
| Ecolab Inc | 0.29 | 1.26 | 1.72 |
| Slb Limited | 0.19 | 1.37 | 0.38 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 0.53 | 1.86 | 0.69 |
| Dover Corp | - | 1.89 | 0.48 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nov Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Q3 2026 | +2.3 % | +104.5 % |
| General Electric Company | Q3 2026 | +15.9 % | +6.2 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q3 2026 | +16.4 % | -6.5 % |
| Slb Limited | Q3 2026 | +5.8 % | -5.0 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Q3 2026 | +5.7 % | +172.5 % |
| Dover Corp | Q3 2026 | +7.5 % | -51.6 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.2 % | -0.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Nov Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | Q3 2026 | +1.3 % | -17.8 % |
| General Electric Company | Q3 2026 | +450.6 % | +9.4 % |
| Ecolab Inc | Q3 2026 | +14.2 % | +19.8 % |
| Slb Limited | Q3 2026 | +93.4 % | +15.0 % |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Q3 2026 | +3.8 % | -15.8 % |
| Dover Corp | Q3 2026 | +6.9 % | +2.3 % |
Nov Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 1.29% | 1.61% | 2.31% |
| General Electric Company | 7.10% | 10.18% | 50.08% |
| Ecolab Inc | 7.57% | 7.61% | 20.76% |
| Slb Limited | 5.63% | 7.16% | 11.40% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 7.58% | 7.40% | 13.49% |
| Dover Corp | 13.30% | 16.39% | 23.89% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Nov Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Nov Inc | 45.33 | 0.73 |
| General Electric Company | 39.06 | 6.69 |
| Ecolab Inc | 41.75 | 4.88 |
| Slb Limited | 23.99 | 2.03 |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 24.25 | 4.14 |
| Dover Corp | 34.75 | 3.33 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 29.00 | 2.57 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.