Imperial Oil Limited's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Imperial Oil Limited (IMO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Imperial Oil Limited vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 40,385M vs 1,088,462M combined for its competitors (3.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+17.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Imperial Oil Limited generated 32.4% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs 39.4% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 15.1% net margin compares with 13.2% for the peer group.
- Scale: Imperial Oil Limited ranks #10 of 13 companies by market capitalization in the Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry, holding 2.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Imperial Oil Limited accounted for 3.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.7% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $8.08M compares with $6.25M for the peer group (1.3x).
- Structure: Imperial Oil Limited operates in the following segments: Upstream, Chemical, Corporate and Unallocated.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
IMO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Imperial Oil Limited reported revenue growth of 32.41 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 39.35 %.
With a net margin of 15.14 %, Imperial Oil Limited achieved higher profitability than its competitors (13.17 %).
Imperial Oil Limited generated 3.51 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.68 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Imperial Oil Limited vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Imperial Oil Limited reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Imperial Oil Limited and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Imperial Oil Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry grew revenue 19.1% year over year, combined, vs 32.4% for Imperial Oil Limited. Imperial Oil Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.81% to 0.90%, a gain of 0.09 percentage points.
Imperial Oil Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| Competitors combined (90) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (11) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
IMO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
IMO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
IMO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
IMO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Dolphin Energy Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Sharkninja Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Gran Tierra Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Calumet Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Valero Energy Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Imperial Oil Limited's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Imperial Oil Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Imperial Oil Limited
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Imperial Oil Limited |
59,943.37 | 40,384.80 |
 Exxon Mobil Corporation |
686,784.60 | 396,627.00 |
 Chevron Corp |
417,431.38 | 233,333.00 |
 Conocophillips |
162,960.39 | 67,749.00 |
 Marathon Petroleum Corporation |
104,367.20 | 174,800.00 |
 Enbridge Inc |
102,689.10 | 60,441.64 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,721,947.62 | 2,043,090.95 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Imperial Oil Limited.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Imperial Oil Limited versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Imperial Oil Limited's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Imperial Oil Limited reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Newmarket Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Verde Clean Fuels Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Dorchester Minerals L p | Company report | 85% |
| NEHC | Company report | 85% |
| EZFL | Company report | 85% |
| New Era Energy and Digital Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Nextnrg Inc | Company report | 85% |
| UMED | Company report | 85% |
| Greenway Technologies Inc and Subsidiaries | Company report | 85% |
| Excelerate Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Ingevity Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Westlake Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Calumet Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Chevron Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Suncor Energy inc | Company report | 85% |
| Valero Energy Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Phillips 66 | Company report | 85% |
| Murphy Oil Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Devon Energy Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Pbf Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hess Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Conocophillips | Company report | 85% |
| Marathon Oil Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Cimarex Energy Co | Company report | 85% |
| Cenovus Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Eog Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Hollyfrontier Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Range Resources Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Vermilion Energy inc | Company report | 85% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Canadian Natural Resources Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Equinor Asa | Company report | 85% |
| Shell Plc | Company report | 85% |
| Apa Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Whiting Petroleum Corp | Company report | 85% |
| Eni Spa | Company report | 85% |
| Ovintiv Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Pioneer Natural Resources Co | Company report | 85% |
| Totalenergies Se | Company report | 85% |
| Delek Us Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Earthstone Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa | Company report | 85% |
| Bp Plc | Company report | 85% |
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | Company report | 85% |
| Williams companies inc | Company report | 85% |
| Par Pacific Holdings Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Callon Petroleum Co | Company report | 85% |
| Gulfport Energy Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Eqt Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Sasol Limited | Company report | 85% |
| Kosmos Energy Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Pdc Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sunoco Lp | Company report | 85% |
| Extraction Oil and Gas Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Southwestern Energy Company | Company report | 85% |
| Ypf Sociedad An nima | Company report | 85% |
| Comstock Resources Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Honeywell International Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Denbury Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Cvr Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Coterra Energy Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Greenfire Resources Ltd | Company report | 85% |
| Sm Energy Co | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Imperial Oil Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Imperial Oil Limited's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | Upstream 43.74 % |
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Refining and Marketing 94.77 % |
| Enbridge Inc | Gas Distributionand Storage Segment 10.46 % |
| Valero Energy Corp | Refining 96.26 % |
| Phillips 66 | Refining 70.79 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Imperial Oil Limited's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | 59,943 | 8,076,960 | 877,524 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 686,785 | 6,838,397 | 707,224 |
| Chevron Corp | 417,431 | 5,421,432 | 633,751 |
| Conocophillips | 162,960 | 6,843,333 | 1,166,061 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 104,367 | 9,448,649 | 854,865 |
| Enbridge Inc | 102,689 | 4,083,895 | 299,395 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,662,004 | 6,245,303 | 621,396 |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Imperial Oil Limited's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Phillips 66 | United States 81.30 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Sharkninja Inc | North America 66.47 % |
| Sm Energy Co | Permian Basin 50.83 % |
| Gran Tierra Energy Inc | Colombia 61.41 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Imperial Oil Limited's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 13 companies in Imperial Oil Limited's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Imperial Oil Limited ranks #10 of 13 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.72 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,848, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exxon Mobil Corporation | 692,425 | 34.31 % |
| 2 | Chevron Corp | 420,022 | 20.81 % |
| 3 | Conocophillips | 165,467 | 8.20 % |
| 4 | Bp Plc | 131,740 | 6.53 % |
| 5 | Equinor Asa | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Valero Energy Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Phillips 66 | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Suncor Energy inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 11 | Ypf Sociedad An nima | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Imperial Oil Limited | 54,801 | 2.72 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Imperial Oil Limited's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-06-26.
Imperial Oil Limited's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Equinor Asa | 109,216 | 76.02 % |
| 6 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 108,095 | 104.03 % |
| 7 | Valero Energy Corp | 101,856 | 107.95 % |
| 8 | Phillips 66 | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Suncor Energy inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Ypf Sociedad An nima | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 13 | Pbf Energy Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Delek Us Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 15 | Calumet Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Imperial Oil Limited's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-06. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Imperial Oil Limited's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (25 companies). See the full Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 21.39 % (avg) | -21.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 19.97 % | industry median | +8.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 18.17 % | 16.80 % (avg) | +1.4 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 3.93 % | 4.39 % (avg) | -0.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Imperial Oil Limited's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry average (25 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil & Gas Integrated Operations industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 11.5x | 13.7x | -2.2x |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.5x | 9.5x | -1.0x |
| P/B | 3.6x | 2.7x | +0.9x |
| Return on Equity | 25.71 % | industry aggregate | 1.69 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 18.70 % | 9.49 % (avg) | 9.21 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Imperial Oil Limited's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -8.63 % | -2.84 % | -34.35 % | 67.90 % | 58.74 % | -17.66 % | -0.39 % | -10.42 % |
| Operating Margin | 11.95 % | 14.63 % | 1.13 % | 16.20 % | 21.15 % | 19.83 % | 17.94 % | 13.61 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.81 % | 8.01 % | 0.43 % | 10.83 % | 22.18 % | 16.30 % | 14.82 % | 10.18 % |
| P/E | 12.8x | 11.7x | - | 13.5x | 5.9x | 6.8x | 8.1x | 14.2x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Imperial Oil Limited's Strategic Group Map
Imperial Oil Limited is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Imperial Oil Limited's trailing-12-month revenue growth of 16.7% and operating margin of 20.0% compares with an average of 15.2% growth and 20.0% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Imperial Oil Limited sits above that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Imperial Oil Limited's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Imperial Oil Limited falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.08x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 16.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Imperial Oil Limited's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,848 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 3.93 % vs industry average 4.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Imperial Oil Limited's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Imperial Oil Limited's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Imperial Oil Limited falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Imperial Oil Limited's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 8.5 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+14.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.08x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 16.3% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (11.5x vs 13.7x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Imperial Oil Limited's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | 0.21 | 1.30 | 0.17 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.12 | 1.13 | 0.16 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.21 | 0.20 |
| Conocophillips | 0.53 | 1.42 | 0.54 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.26 | 1.29 | 1.92 |
| Enbridge Inc | 0.07 | 0.75 | 1.78 |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Imperial Oil Limited's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | Q3 2026 | +32.4 % | +348.2 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | +32.7 % | +98.4 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +36.3 % | +174.7 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +29.3 % | +131.8 % |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Q3 2026 | +61.0 % | +283.3 % |
| Enbridge Inc | Q2 2026 | +97.1 % | -34.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +21.6 % | +120.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Imperial Oil Limited's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | Q3 2026 | - | +22.6 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | -17.7 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +33.3 % | -9.7 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +26.7 % | - |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Q3 2026 | +40.4 % | +19.0 % |
| Enbridge Inc | Q2 2026 | - | +35.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
Imperial Oil Limited's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | 13.07% | 16.83% | 25.71% |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 8.87% | 9.71% | 15.39% |
| Chevron Corp | 8.28% | 8.44% | 14.04% |
| Conocophillips | 9.33% | 10.36% | 17.73% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 17.15% | 17.01% | 61.37% |
| Enbridge Inc | 2.68% | 2.51% | 8.69% |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Imperial Oil Limited's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Imperial Oil Limited | 11.26 | 1.48 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 17.12 | 1.73 |
| Chevron Corp | 15.49 | 1.79 |
| Conocophillips | 14.34 | 2.41 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 7.30 | 0.60 |
| Enbridge Inc | 18.10 | 1.70 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 13.37 | 1.33 |
Sign in to see all peers for Imperial Oil Limited.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.