Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Ten Holdings Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ten Holdings Inc (XHLD) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2026
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-34.50 %
Q2 2026
Net Margin
-408.34 %
Q2 2026

Key Findings: Ten Holdings Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.2% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Ten Holdings Inc ranks #132 of 168 companies by market capitalization in the Professional Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Ten Holdings Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

XHLD Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026

Ten Holdings Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/XHLD/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/XHLD/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/XHLD/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs -34.5% for Ten Holdings Inc. Ten Holdings Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Ten Holdings Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Ten Holdings Inc No - - Yes
High-Confidence Competitors (3) 33% 67% 33% 67%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 11% 38% 25% 40%

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2026

100%market share
  • Ten Holdings Inc100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Ten Holdings Inc and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Ten Holdings Inc's full market share breakdown »

XHLD Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

XHLD Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Ten Holdings Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
50%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 3)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Ten Holdings Inc -83.80 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (3) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ten Holdings Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

XHLD Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

XHLD High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 3) Percent change over the selected range

XHLD Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

XHLD Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

Ten Holdings Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the domestic and global webcasting industry, which is highly competitive and includes both large and small firms. Key competitors include Zoom, ON24, GlobalMeet, Cvent, Bizzabo, and Meeting Tomorrow. Established companies with extensive resources offering communication and engagement technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, contribute to the competitive landscape. The company provides virtual and hybrid event solutions through its proprietary webcasting and event management platform, Xyvid Pro, which features professional audio-visual production, customizable event designs, device interoperability, enhanced attendee engagement, and comprehensive data analytics. The company holds registered intellectual property comprising ten domain names and two trademarks: TEN Holdings and TEN Events.

Ten Holdings Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
GlobalMeet Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Bizzabo Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Zoom Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Meeting Tomorrow Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cvent Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
ON24 Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ten Holdings Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License