Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
4
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
18.14 %
vs 19.70 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-1.48 %
Peers: 9.08 %
Net Margin
21.08 %
Peers: 24.28 %

Key Findings: Woodside Energy Group Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 12,984M vs 69,829M combined for tracked competitors (15.7% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+235.7%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated -1.5% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs 9.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 21.1% net margin compares with 24.3% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Woodside Energy Group Ltd ranks #11 of 134 companies by market capitalization in the Oil And Gas Production industry, holding 2.8% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Woodside Energy Group Ltd accounted for 18.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 19.7% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $26.28M compares with $0.73M for the peer group (36.3x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

WDS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported revenue contraction of 1.48 % year on year in Q4 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.08 %.

With a net margin of 21.08 %, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported lower profitability than its competitors (24.28 %).

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated 18.14 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 19.70 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WDS/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WDS/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/WDS/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Revenue growth, year on year

Woodside Energy Group Ltd -1.5 %
Competitors combined +9.1 %

Net income growth, year on year

Woodside Energy Group Ltd -24.9 %
Competitors combined +16.0 %

Net margin

Woodside Energy Group Ltd +21.1 %
Competitors combined +24.3 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Woodside Energy Group Ltd +300.0 %
Competitors combined +235.7 %

TTM net margin

Woodside Energy Group Ltd +21.1 %
Competitors combined +16.9 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Woodside Energy Group Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Woodside Energy Group Ltd $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (3) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Woodside Energy Group Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Oil And Gas Production industry grew revenue 3.3% year over year, combined, vs -1.5% for Woodside Energy Group Ltd. Woodside Energy Group Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.92% to 0.88%, a loss of 0.04 percentage points.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Woodside Energy Group Ltd Yes No No No
Competitors combined (4) 67% 100% 100% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) - - - 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 100% 60% 60% 25%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8) 37.50 % (3 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

18.1%market share
  • Woodside Energy Group Ltd18.1%
  • Competitors combined81.9%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Woodside Energy Group Ltd and its 4 tracked competitors.

See Woodside Energy Group Ltd's full market share breakdown »

WDS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

WDS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
75%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(3 of 4)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 1)
80%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(8 of 10)
60%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(3 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Woodside Energy Group Ltd 33.00 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (4) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Woodside Energy Group Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

WDS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

WDS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 1) Percent change over the selected range

WDS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

WDS Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

WDS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

WDS Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Tamboran Resources Corporation 282.9% Outperformed
2 Openlane inc 282.9% Outperformed
3 Novartis Ag 282.9% Outperformed
4 Molson Coors Beverage Company 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Woodside Energy Group Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Woodside acknowledges potential challenges in competing with larger companies that have greater resources. The Louisiana LNG project faces risks such as the failure to secure purchase agreements for most of its expected production volumes, which could significantly affect the project's prospects and financial performance. The project also depends on external suppliers, and delays or failures by these providers to meet timelines, quality standards, or competitive pricing could impact the project's success and costs. Additionally, credit rating agencies may downgrade Woodside's credit ratings if the company is unable to execute a material sell-down of its interest in LALNG HoldCo in the near term.

Publicly Traded Peers of Woodside Energy Group Ltd

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Woodside Energy Group Ltd 41,521.24 12,984.00 2,737.00 494
Novartis Ag 284,863.05 56,674.00 13,967.00 75,267
Molson Coors Beverage Company 6,759.08 11,079.90 -2,355.90 16,200
Openlane inc 4,056.29 2,075.20 191.20 4,800
Tamboran Resources Corporation 741.76 - -27.28 45
SUBTOTAL 337,941.42 82,813.10 14,512.02 96,806

Sources: Woodside Energy Group Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Woodside Energy Group Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Heliogen Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Woodside Energy Group Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Molson Coors Beverage Company Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific 36.11 % - -
Openlane inc Marketplace 80.65 % Finance 19.35 % -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Woodside Energy Group Ltd 41,521 26,283,401 5,540,486
Novartis Ag 284,863 752,973 185,566
Molson Coors Beverage Company 6,759 683,944 -145,426
Openlane inc 4,056 432,333 39,833
Tamboran Resources Corporation 742 - -606,244
PEERS TOTAL 296,420 725,030 122,259

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Openlane inc United States 61.16 % Non-US 38.84 % -

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 113 companies in Woodside Energy Group Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd ranks #11 of 113 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 2.77 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 785, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Shell Plc 285,448 18.97 %
2 Totalenergies Se 212,542 14.13 %
3 Canadian Natural Resources Limited 103,568 6.88 %
4 Eni Spa 95,130 6.32 %
5 Slb Limited 1,234 5.2%
6 Eog Resources Inc 1,234 5.2%
7 Occidental Petroleum Corporation 1,234 5.2%
8 Cenovus Energy Inc 1,234 5.2%
9 Diamondback Energy Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Devon Energy Corp 1,234 5.2%
11 Woodside Energy Group Ltd 41,657 2.77 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
6 Eog Resources Inc 73,938 19.15 % 8.02 % 0.34 0.61
7 Occidental Petroleum Corporation 55,924 16.39 % 13.19 % 0.44 0.50
8 Cenovus Energy Inc 55,325 73.66 % 26.68 % 0.70 1.79
9 Diamondback Energy Inc 51,785 24.22 % 6.00 % 0.61 0.77
10 Devon Energy Corp 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
11 Woodside Energy Group Ltd 41,657 32.99 % 10.18 % 0.56 0.76
12 Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro Sa 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
13 Ecopetrol S a 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
14 Eqt Corporation 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
15 Halliburton Company 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
16 Pembina Pipeline Corporation 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Woodside Energy Group Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Oil And Gas Production industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (165 companies). See the full Oil And Gas Production industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 34.94 % 57.30 % (avg) -22.4 pp
Operating Margin 29.95 % industry median +18.7 pp
EBITDA Margin 29.64 % 11.81 % (avg) +17.8 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.00 % 24.95 % (avg) -24.9 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Oil And Gas Production industry average (165 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Oil And Gas Production industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 11.2x 15.8x -4.6x
EV / EBITDA 9.4x 8.9x +0.5x
P/B 0.8x 1.8x -1.0x
Return on Equity 6.87 % industry aggregate -4.91 %
Return on Invested Capital 4.33 % 5.38 % (avg) -1.05 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 202320242025
Revenue Growth -16.79 %-5.82 %-1.48 %
Operating Margin 23.63 %34.25 %29.95 %
Return on Invested Capital 4.10 %5.47 %4.33 %
P/E 24.5x8.6x11.2x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Woodside Energy Group Ltd's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Woodside Energy Group Ltd is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)PHXMTDRSBOWSTRCLRMROWoodside Energy Group LtdPBRDGAS

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Woodside Energy Group Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Woodside Energy Group Ltd

Woodside Energy Group Ltd falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.15x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 0.1% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 785 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 24.95 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Woodside Energy Group Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Woodside Energy Group Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Woodside Energy Group Ltd
Harvest / Divest

Woodside Energy Group Ltd falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 18.7 points above the industry median.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.

Weaknesses

  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.15x).

Opportunities

No rule matched.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Woodside Energy Group Ltd 1.05 1.59 0.29 0.20
Novartis Ag 0.42 1.12 0.02 0.51
Molson Coors Beverage Company 0.21 0.64 0.69 0.48
Openlane inc 0.07 1.16 0.30 0.43
Tamboran Resources Corporation 1.62 1.94 0.04 -

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Woodside Energy Group LtdQ4 2025-1.5 %-1.5 %-24.9 %-24.9 %
Novartis AgQ4 2025+9.6 %+9.6 %+17.0 %+17.0 %
Molson Coors Beverage CompanyQ2 2026+268.0 %+430.5 %-47.8 %+47.6 %
Openlane inc Q2 2026+15.1 %+5.1 %+22.5 %-4.7 %
Tamboran Resources CorporationQ2 2026----
PEERS TOTAL+14.4 %+15.3 %+5.8 %+7.6 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Woodside Energy Group LtdQ4 2025+12.6 %+12.6 %--
Novartis AgQ4 2025+18.3 %+18.3 %+13.3 %+13.3 %
Molson Coors Beverage CompanyQ2 2026+277.1 %+454.3 %-36.6 %-55.3 %
Openlane inc Q2 2026+29.6 %+20.9 %-2.8 %+5.3 %
Tamboran Resources CorporationQ2 2026--+86.6 %-

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Woodside Energy Group Ltd4.12%5.48%6.87%7.42-
Novartis Ag12.59%12.62%30.00%6.34-
Molson Coors Beverage Company---13.244.22
Openlane inc 3.93%8.95%13.93%5.63-
Tamboran Resources Corporation-----

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Woodside Energy Group Ltd's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Woodside Energy Group Ltd15.283.200.2410.581.04
Novartis Ag20.375.0327.3424.866.12
Molson Coors Beverage Company-0.61-4.460.66
Openlane inc 17.391.95-58.792.58
Tamboran Resources Corporation---3.900.77
PEERS AVERAGE23.294.0819.703.41

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License