Ttm Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ttm Technologies Inc (TTMI) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ttm Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,377M vs 78,158M combined for tracked competitors (4.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+18.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+6.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ttm Technologies Inc generated 37.5% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 19.3% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 8.3% net margin compares with 3.8% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ttm Technologies Inc ranks #32 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ttm Technologies Inc accounted for 4.6% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 4.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.19M compares with $0.32M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TTMI Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Ttm Technologies Inc reported revenue growth of 37.52 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 19.29 %.
With a net margin of 8.27 %, Ttm Technologies Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (3.78 %).
Ttm Technologies Inc generated 4.59 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 4.01 % a year earlier.
Ttm Technologies Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ttm Technologies Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ttm Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs 37.5% for Ttm Technologies Inc. Ttm Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.14% to 0.18%, a gain of 0.03 percentage points.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Competitors combined (15) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TTMI Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TTMI Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TTMI Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TTMI Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benchmark Electronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Sanmina Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Plexus Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Jabil Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Globalfoundries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ttm Technologies Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We believe that our key competitive strengths include:
Leading global PCB manufacturer. We are one of the largest and most diversified PCB manufacturers in the world and enjoy significant economies of scale.The PCB industry is highly fragmented with the top 20 PCB providers comprising approximately 48% of market share, according to NTI. As our customers consolidate their supply base, we offer the technology breadth and scale to emerge as a preferred partner.
Breadth of technology and products. We offer a wide range of PCB products and electro-mechanical solutions, including HDI PCBs, conventional PCBs, flexible PCBs, rigid-flex PCBs, custom assemblies, and integrated circuit (IC) substrates. We also offer certain value-added services to support our customers’ needs. These include design for manufacturability (DFM), PCB layout design, simulation and testing services, and quick turnaround QTA services. By providing these value-added services to customers, we are able to provide our customers with a “one-stop” manufacturing solution, which we believe enhances our relationships with our customers.
Diversified business model. Our sales are diversified by a well-balanced portfolio of end markets which we serve and by the customers we sell to within those end markets. We believe this diversity reduces our exposure to, and reliance on, any single end market or customer. We enjoy a large and diverse customer base with over 2,000 customers, as well as long-term relationships in excess of ten years with our ten largest customers.
Focused on attractive end markets with a favorable growth outlook and dependence on sophisticated product capabilities. We believe that our global manufacturing footprint and breadth of capabilities enables us to serve several key end markets for the PCB industry. The automotive industry in particular provides an opportunity for us as we combine our traditional market strength in core automotive engine controls with the advanced technologies and RF capabilities we offer for growing requirements in safety systems, automated driving and infotainment.
One-stop solution for customers. We are capable of providing a one-stop manufacturing solution to our customers from engineering support and prototype development through final volume production around the globe. This one-stop manufacturing solution allows us to better serve our customers, many of whom are based in time-critical high growth markets, enabling our customers to reduce the time required to develop new products and bring them to market. We utilize a facility specialization strategy in which each customer is directed to the facility best suited to the customer’s product type, delivery time, complexity and volume needs, which enables us to reduce the time from order placement to delivery. As our customers ramp to volume, we are positioned to seamlessly transition them to one of our volume facilities in China.
Leading aerospace and defense supplier. We provide the aerospace and defense industry with products in North America from our broad North American footprint. We have passed OEM and government certification processes, and administrative requirements associated with participation in government and commercial aerospace programs. When supplying various departments and agencies of the U.S. government, we are required to maintain facility security clearances under the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual and International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Along with supply of traditional and RF PCBs, we offer our engineering services and assembly capabilities which allow us to bring additional value to our customers.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ttm Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,645.83 | 3,376.84 |
| Jabil Inc | 34,290.87 | 33,590.00 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 26,856.54 | 6,791.00 |
| Fabrinet | 15,193.76 | 4,641.10 |
| Nova Ltd | 12,474.17 | 880.58 |
| Sanmina Corporation | 12,319.47 | 12,764.33 |
| SUBTOTAL | 129,846.76 | 89,562.12 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Ttm Technologies Inc .
Sources: Ttm Technologies Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ttm Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Micropac Industries Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Multek Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| E-M Solutions | Named by the company | 85% |
| IBIDEN Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Unimicron Technology Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Chin Poon Industrial Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sanmina Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amphenol Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| ISU Petasys Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wus Printed Circuit Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Compeq Manufacturing Co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tripod Technology Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Systemtechnik AG | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ttm Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Commercial 58.57 % |
| Jabil Inc | Intelligent Infrastructure 47.64 % |
| Fabrinet | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Reportable Segment - IMS 85.36 % |
| Plexus Corp | Asia Pacific 56.05 % |
| Osi Systems inc | Security Division 70.58 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Ttm Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,646 | 185,541 | 13,010 |
| Jabil Inc | 34,291 | 248,815 | 6,378 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 26,857 | 4,244,375 | 555,000 |
| Fabrinet | 15,194 | 215,654 | 21,980 |
| Nova Ltd | 12,474 | 1,291,169 | 380,092 |
| Sanmina Corporation | 12,319 | 344,982 | 8,834 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 116,201 | 318,181 | 13,713 |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Ttm Technologies Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | US 48.94 % |
| Fabrinet | Asia Pacific 73.85 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Americas 69.06 % |
| Benchmark Electronics Inc | US 53.60 % |
| Ncr Voyix Corporation | United States 61.88 % |
| Kimball Electronics Inc | Mexico 25.13 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Ttm Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 109 companies in Ttm Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ttm Technologies Inc ranks #32 of 109 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.11 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,365, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,598,545 | 44.26 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 14.10 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,217,759 | 9.63 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,011,902 | 8.00 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 32 | Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,646 | 0.11 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ttm Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-29.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | First Solar Inc | 18,695 | -21.13 % |
| 28 | Sitime Corporation | 18,270 | 127.01 % |
| 29 | Semtech Corp | 17,859 | 189.32 % |
| 30 | Lattice Semiconductor Corp | 17,586 | 75.77 % |
| 31 | Amkor Technology Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 32 | Ttm Technologies Inc | 13,646 | 127.39 % |
| 33 | Skyworks Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 34 | Sanmina Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 35 | Rambus Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 36 | Qorvo Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 37 | Formfactor inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ttm Technologies Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-29. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies). See the full Semiconductors industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.19 % | 34.40 % (avg) | -13.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | 9.90 % | industry median | +7.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 12.09 % | 7.07 % (avg) | +5.0 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 10.01 % | 9.39 % (avg) | +0.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Semiconductors industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 74.8x | 43.3x | +31.5x |
| EV / EBITDA | 44.8x | 22.7x | +22.1x |
| P/B | 9.9x | 6.6x | +3.3x |
| Return on Equity | 13.09 % | industry aggregate | -33.74 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 7.11 % | -0.16 % (avg) | 7.27 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 8.43 % | -5.55 % | -21.72 % | 6.81 % | -0.02 % | 10.97 % | 9.43 % | 18.97 % |
| Operating Margin | 5.59 % | 4.47 % | 1.33 % | 5.60 % | 5.60 % | 8.43 % | 4.75 % | 9.11 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 4.22 % | 2.99 % | 0.73 % | 3.21 % | 3.18 % | 5.30 % | 2.85 % | 6.10 % |
| P/E | 8.2x | 34.9x | 8.0x | 29.0x | 26.9x | 19.4x | 45.8x | 44.5x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Ttm Technologies Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Ttm Technologies Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ttm Technologies Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Ttm Technologies Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Ttm Technologies Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 44% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,365 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Moderate, in line with the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 10.01 % vs industry average 9.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ttm Technologies Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ttm Technologies Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ttm Technologies Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ttm Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 7.1 points above the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+18.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 33.7 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (33.30 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 44.26 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 0.46 | 1.87 | 0.52 |
| Jabil Inc | 0.11 | 0.99 | 2.44 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 0.76 | 2.62 | 0.08 |
| Fabrinet | 0.31 | 2.60 | - |
| Nova Ltd | 0.96 | 6.28 | 0.56 |
| Sanmina Corporation | 0.36 | 1.74 | 0.50 |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +37.5 % | +100.0 % |
| Jabil Inc | Q2 2026 | +11.8 % | +23.9 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | +0.6 % | - |
| Fabrinet | Q2 2026 | +44.6 % | +59.7 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.0 % | +41.1 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Q2 2026 | +69.7 % | +71.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +14.7 % | +251.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ttm Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +36.1 % | +3.2 % |
| Jabil Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.9 % | +114.0 % |
| Globalfoundries Inc | Q4 2025 | -0.4 % | +15.5 % |
| Fabrinet | Q2 2026 | +45.0 % | +82.4 % |
| Nova Ltd | Q4 2025 | +31.6 % | +60.9 % |
| Sanmina Corporation | Q2 2026 | +66.7 % | +172.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
Ttm Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 5.94% | 8.20% | 13.09% |
| Jabil Inc | 4.19% | 15.49% | 62.17% |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 5.18% | 5.51% | 7.41% |
| Fabrinet | 14.27% | 21.02% | 21.50% |
| Nova Ltd | 10.98% | 11.74% | 19.66% |
| Sanmina Corporation | 4.20% | 8.08% | 12.51% |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ttm Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ttm Technologies Inc | 57.14 | 4.04 |
| Jabil Inc | 40.30 | 1.02 |
| Globalfoundries Inc | 30.27 | 3.95 |
| Fabrinet | 32.09 | 3.27 |
| Nova Ltd | 47.78 | 14.17 |
| Sanmina Corporation | 40.04 | 0.97 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 32.86 | 1.45 |
Sign in to see all peers for Ttm Technologies Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.