Trans Lux's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Trans Lux (TNLX) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Trans Lux vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 13M vs 100,291M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+27.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-18.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Trans Lux generated 0.9% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2024, vs 12.9% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -9.8% net margin compares with 4.7% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Trans Lux accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.30M compares with $1.17M for the peer group (0.3x).
- Structure: Trans Lux operates in the following segments: Sales of Digital Display Products, Digital Product Sales, Digital Product Lease and Maintenance, Lease and Maintenance of Digital Display Products.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TNLX Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Trans Lux reported revenue growth of 0.86 % year on year in Q4 2024, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 12.91 %.
With a net margin of -9.78 %, Trans Lux reported lower profitability than its competitors (4.74 %).
Trans Lux generated 0.02 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.02 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Trans Lux vs. its Competitors, Q4 2024
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Trans Lux reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Trans Lux and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Trans Lux's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry grew revenue 10.1% year over year, combined, vs 0.9% for Trans Lux. Trans Lux's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Trans Lux's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (7) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TNLX Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TNLX Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Synaptics Incorporated | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Kopin Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Himax Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Hp inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Sony Group Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Trans Lux's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Trans Lux's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Trans lux Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Trans lux Corporation |
0.01 | 12.86 |
 Sony Group Corporation |
164,451.98 | 85,067.32 |
 Hp inc |
27,216.72 | 59,162.00 |
 Super Micro Computer Inc |
18,734.25 | 39,061.40 |
 Synaptics Incorporated |
4,654.72 | 1,197.00 |
 Himax Technologies Inc |
1,508.49 | 832.17 |
| SUBTOTAL | 217,354.40 | 185,398.40 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Trans lux Corporation.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Trans lux Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Trans Lux's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Trans Lux reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| INTEL | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Trans Lux's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Trans Lux's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | Sales of Digital Display Products 94.32 % |
| Hp inc | Commercial PS 53.74 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Trans Lux's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | 0 | 299,116 | -80,907 |
| Sony Group Corporation | 164,452 | 896,389 | 80,243 |
| Hp inc | 27,217 | 1,075,673 | 44,564 |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | 18,734 | 5,580,200 | 318,637 |
| Synaptics Incorporated | 4,655 | 704,118 | -287,000 |
| Himax Technologies Inc | 1,508 | 4,119,668 | 224,134 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 217,354 | 1,166,013 | 74,476 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
Trans Lux's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | US 99.46 % |
| Hp inc | Americas 40.65 % |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | United States 80.15 % |
| Synaptics Incorporated | China 48.73 % |
| Kopin Corporation | US 95.31 % |
| Emagin Corporation | EMEA 65.06 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Trans Lux's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 34 companies in Trans Lux's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Trans Lux ranks #0 of 34 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,553, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abb Ltd | 157,071 | 31.37 % |
| 2 | Trane Technologies Plc | 93,951 | 18.76 % |
| 3 | Ferguson Enterprises Inc | 49,452 | 9.88 % |
| 4 | Xylem Inc | 22,489 | 4.49 % |
| 5 | Amcor Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Snap on Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Itt Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Idex Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Stanley Black and Decker Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Graco Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Trans lux Corporation | - | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Trans Lux's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-12.
Trans Lux's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (53 companies). See the full Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 10.55 % | 25.63 % (avg) | -15.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | -21.49 % | industry median | -31.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -24.44 % | 4.04 % (avg) | -28.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.03 % | 6.51 % (avg) | -6.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Trans Lux's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry average (53 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 25.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 16.0x | - |
| P/B | -0.4x | 3.0x | -3.4x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | 0.09 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Trans Lux's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -10.08 % | 15.35 % | -41.09 % | 18.31 % | -6.00 % | 90.85 % | -28.20 % | -17.30 % |
| Operating Margin | -3.87 % | -11.64 % | -28.10 % | -2.65 % | -37.30 % | -1.80 % | -19.19 % | -21.49 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -37.72 % | 139.29 % | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | 0.0x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Trans Lux's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,553 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.03 % vs industry average 6.51 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Trans Lux's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Trans Lux's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Trans Lux falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Trans Lux's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+27.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 31.2 points below the industry median.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-18.8% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Trans Lux's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | 0.01 | 0.21 | - |
| Sony Group Corporation | 0.28 | 0.70 | 0.28 |
| Hp inc | 0.03 | 0.78 | - |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | 0.91 | 3.72 | 0.24 |
| Synaptics Incorporated | 0.88 | 1.64 | 0.73 |
| Himax Technologies Inc | 0.32 | 1.58 | 0.01 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trans Lux's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | Q4 2024 | +0.9 % | - |
| Sony Group Corporation | Q1 2025 | -5.7 % | +12.1 % |
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +12.5 % | -13.4 % |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | Q2 2026 | +93.2 % | +503.7 % |
| Synaptics Incorporated | Q3 2026 | +0.8 % | - |
| Himax Technologies Inc | Q4 2025 | -8.2 % | -43.2 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +1.7 % | +21.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Trans Lux's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | Q4 2024 | -17.2 % | - |
| Sony Group Corporation | Q1 2025 | -0.4 % | - |
| Hp inc | Q2 2026 | +14.9 % | -13.0 % |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | Q2 2026 | +76.0 % | +24.5 % |
| Synaptics Incorporated | Q3 2026 | -8.0 % | +130.3 % |
| Himax Technologies Inc | Q4 2025 | -8.4 % | +54.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
Trans Lux's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | - | - | - |
| Sony Group Corporation | 3.23% | 4.64% | 13.41% |
| Hp inc | 5.69% | 22.60% | - |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | 10.91% | 13.60% | 25.58% |
| Synaptics Incorporated | - | - | - |
| Himax Technologies Inc | 2.61% | 4.84% | 5.02% |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Trans Lux's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Trans lux Corporation | - | 0.00 |
| Sony Group Corporation | 0.14 | 1.93 |
| Hp inc | 11.25 | 0.46 |
| Super Micro Computer Inc | 8.22 | 0.48 |
| Synaptics Incorporated | - | 3.89 |
| Himax Technologies Inc | 34.33 | 1.81 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.36 | 1.17 |
Sign in to see all peers for Trans lux Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.