Teradata's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Teradata (TDC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Teradata vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,752M vs 507,208M combined for tracked competitors (0.3% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+8.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Teradata generated 15.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 7.8% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 9.8% net margin compares with 12.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Teradata ranks #83 of 260 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Teradata accounted for 0.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.3% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.31M compares with $0.29M for the peer group (1.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
TDC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Teradata reported revenue growth of 15.44 % year on year in Q2 2026, above its competitors' combined revenue growth of 7.79 %.
With a net margin of 9.77 %, Teradata reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.59 %).
Teradata generated 0.34 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.32 % a year earlier.
Teradata vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Teradata and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Teradata's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.0% year over year, combined, vs 15.4% for Teradata. Teradata's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.15% to 0.15%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Teradata's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (24) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
TDC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
TDC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
TDC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
TDC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dell Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Premier Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Aspen Technology inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Hp inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Iron Mountain Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Teradata's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Teradata's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Competition. The analytic data platforms market is highly competitive, and we face a number of large traditional competitors, such as IBM and Oracle. We also expect to continue to see new and emerging competitors, as large and growing markets attract more market participants. We compete successfully in the marketplace and are bolstered by our expanded Teradata workload-specific platform family, which includes the: Active Enterprise Data Warehouse, Data Warehouse Appliance, Data Mart Appliance, Integrated Big Data Platform, all of which run on the Teradata Database; the Teradata Aster Discovery platform, and Teradata Appliance for Hadoop (leveraging the Apache Hadoop distribution); a powerful suite of software tools; and related services. These solutions are tied together within our Unified Data Architecture. We believe our proven architecture for both structured and unstructured data, integrated solutions with high-performing and scalable technology, deep and broad consulting and support services capabilities, strong customer relationships, and our successful track record will collectively enable us to continue to compete successfully.
Competitors take different technical and integration approaches to addressing
enterprise analytics needs, and therefore they often recommend a different architecture
than we do. We believe that our customers recognize the advantages of our technologies
and our approach as described above.
Our Active Enterprise Data Warehouse platform technology is designed to scale
with customer growth needs and support the coexistence of multiple generations
of nodes in a single environment, thus protecting the customer’s prior
investments. Because our Teradata workload-specific platform family also includes
data warehousing and big data discovery appliances, we believe we have the right
platform for any analytical architecture need and any data type, both structured
and unstructured, which makes our analytic data platforms particularly attractive
to customers and enable us to successfully compete in the marketplace.
Key factors used to evaluate competitors in these markets include: data analytics
experience; customer references; technology leadership; product quality; performance,
scalability, availability and manageability; support and consulting services
capabilities; industry knowledge; and total cost of ownership. We believe we
have a competitive advantage in providing complete, integrated, and optimized
analytic data platforms that address customers’ business, technical and
architecture requirements.
Many companies participate in adjacent areas of the analytics market, such as
enterprise analytic and business intelligence application software. The status
of our business relationships with these companies can influence our ability
to compete. Our products also complement offerings of some of our competitors,
with whom we have formed partnerships to work with their business intelligence
and application software businesses. Examples of these companies include both
IBM and Oracle, due to their acquisitions of other business intelligence, consulting
and application software companies in recent years.
In the marketing applications space we also see competition from companies like IBM, Oracle, and Adobe, along with a variety of niche providers whose offerings overlap to a greater or lesser degree with our own. The marketing application space is growing rapidly and, as with many large growing markets, continues to attract new competitors, either through acquisition or new development. We believe we compete successfully in this market, supported by the integration of our marketing applications with the Teradata data analytic solutions and other leading data solutions providers. Our ability to compete is further enhanced by the integration between our marketing operations, campaign management, and digital messaging solution components which make up our marketing application suite. Our competitive differentiators also include high-level performance at scale, robust and flexible functionality, and a complete product set for online and offline marketing.
Publicly Traded Peers of Teradata Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | 2,746.51 | 1,752.00 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830.00 | 73,266.00 |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 354,368.52 | 151,197.00 |
| Sap Se | 246,009.75 | 41,216.00 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,356.66 | 69,096.00 |
| Salesforce Inc | 186,588.67 | 43,938.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 1,701,028.29 | 594,784.09 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Teradata Corporation.
Sources: Teradata Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Teradata Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Teradata's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cloudera Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Teradata's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Teradata's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| Dell Technologies Inc | Infrastructure Solutions Group 53.57 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Accenture Plc | Americas 49.30 % |
| Iron Mountain Inc | Global Records and Information Management Business 72.52 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Teradata's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | 2,747 | 307,368 | 80,351 |
| Oracle Corporation | 397,830 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 354,369 | 1,558,732 | 117,299 |
| Sap Se | 246,010 | 374,691 | 74,592 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 210,357 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| Salesforce Inc | 186,589 | 604,524 | 132,935 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 1,698,282 | 289,059 | 37,323 |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Teradata's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| Dell Technologies Inc | United States 55.61 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Americas 64.97 % |
| Hp inc | Americas 40.65 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Teradata's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 236 companies in Teradata's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Teradata ranks #83 of 236 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.04 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,661, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,756,759 | 50.30 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 486,305 | 6.51 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 388,902 | 5.21 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 268,701 | 3.60 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 83 | Teradata Corporation | 2,700 | 0.04 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Teradata's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Teradata's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 78 | Freshworks Inc | 3,300 | -2.81 % |
| 79 | Alarm com Holdings Inc | 2,948 | 2.79 % |
| 80 | Sps Commerce Inc | 2,919 | -23.96 % |
| 81 | Avepoint Inc | 2,798 | -16.75 % |
| 82 | Intapp Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 83 | Teradata Corporation | 2,700 | 28.27 % |
| 84 | Cellebrite Di Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 85 | Soundhound Ai Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 86 | Braze Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 87 | Appian Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 88 | Via Transportation Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Teradata's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Teradata's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (343 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 62.16 % | 64.28 % (avg) | -2.1 pp |
| Operating Margin | 7.25 % | industry median | +10.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 38.81 % | 2.53 % (avg) | +36.3 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 1.43 % | 4.79 % (avg) | -3.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Teradata's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (343 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 6.8x | 39.5x | -32.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.3x | 21.7x | -17.4x |
| P/B | 7.8x | 5.4x | +2.4x |
| Return on Equity | 114.57 % | industry aggregate | 89.37 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 9.05 % | -0.26 % (avg) | 9.31 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Teradata's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 0.37 % | 0.00 % | 0.00 % | -11.41 % | -7.93 % | 3.85 % | -4.53 % | -4.97 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.99 % | 1.99 % | 1.99 % | 12.05 % | 5.78 % | 10.15 % | 11.94 % | 12.33 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.18 % | 2.67 % | 2.69 % | 13.97 % | 8.32 % | 16.97 % | 24.30 % | 18.49 % |
| P/E | 158.7x | 124.5x | 45.9x | 34.2x | 419.7x | 74.9x | 27.0x | 21.9x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Teradata's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Teradata's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Teradata is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Teradata's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Teradata's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Teradata falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 11.6% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Microsoft Corporation alone holds 50% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Teradata's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,661 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 1.43 % vs industry average 4.79 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Teradata's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Teradata's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Teradata's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Teradata falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Teradata's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 10.0 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 89.4 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+7.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (6.8x vs 39.5x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 50.30 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Teradata's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | 0.59 | 1.01 | 0.85 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 0.16 | 0.93 | - |
| Sap Se | 0.47 | 1.16 | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
| Salesforce Inc | 0.30 | 0.83 | 0.53 |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Teradata's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.4 % | +411.1 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| Dell Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +57.7 % | +255.1 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +7.7 % | +132.6 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.8 % | +86.9 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +15.8 % | +59.9 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Teradata's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | Q2 2026 | -6.2 % | -75.0 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| Dell Technologies Inc | Q2 2026 | +52.7 % | +83.6 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +8.0 % | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.2 % | +26.7 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
Teradata's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | 24.96% | 45.61% | 114.57% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 10.56% | 18.14% | - |
| Sap Se | 10.41% | 13.84% | 16.25% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
| Salesforce Inc | 9.12% | 12.41% | 20.15% |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Teradata's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Teradata Corporation | 6.01 | 1.57 |
| Oracle Corporation | 20.79 | 5.43 |
| Dell Technologies Inc | 31.67 | 2.34 |
| Sap Se | 34.35 | 5.97 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 19.55 | 3.04 |
| Salesforce Inc | 20.79 | 4.25 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 22.08 | 2.86 |
Sign in to see all peers for Teradata Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.