Tat Technologies Ltd (TATT) — Comparison of Productivity to Peers

Tat Technologies Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Table 1: Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, Income per Employee for the 12 Months period ended in Q4 2024

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
MARKET CAP
(Millions $)
REVENUE / EMPLOYEE
($) in 12 months
INCOME / EMPLOYEE
($) in 12 months
Tat Technologies Ltd
TATT
437 - -
Abb Ltd
ABBNY
136,048 307,000 36,419
Aecom
ACM
13,668 322,774 12,724
Argan Inc
AGX
4,441 572,761 109,104
Allient Inc
ALNT
915 - -
Ametek Inc
AME
46,288 333,222 68,316
American Superconductor Corp
AMSC
1,435 792,878 44,938
Astronics Corporation
ATRO
1,831 332,496 -1,235
Bwx Technologies Inc
BWXT
16,326 493,363 49,558
Clearday Inc
CLRD
0 - -
Cpi Aerostructures Inc
CVU
37 212,025 -1,708
Ducommun Incorporated
DCO
1,340 356,387 -15,279
Dover Corp
DOV
26,530 299,359 140,004
Flowserve Corp
FLS
9,403 292,957 29,691
Hill International inc
HIL
197 89,895 -482
Honeywell International Inc
HON
122,048 428,105 65,105
Hubbell Inc
HUBB
23,592 307,201 45,624
Huntsman Corporation
HUN
1,733 917,460 -42,857
Iec Electronics Corp
IEC
169 333,904 7,331
Idex Corp
IEX
13,351 388,784 54,250
Kbr Inc
KBR
5,670 237,059 10,824
Quaker Chemical Corporation
KWR
2,344 548,827 -2,639
Mativ Holdings Inc
MATV
660 1,167,353 -256,882
Mirion Technologies Inc
MIR
6,397 300,800 9,300
3m Company
MMM
88,184 292,059 40,188
Nuverra Environmental Solutions Inc
NES
35 - -
Parker hannifin Corporation
PH
113,628 327,716 59,579
Piedmont Lithium Inc
PLL
159 8,185,615 -4,091,308
Plexus Corp
PLXS
4,153 239,959 10,288
Parsons Corporation
PSN
7,244 283,317 19,654
Rockwell Automation Inc
ROK
45,934 308,963 27,741
Sifco Industries Inc
SIF
40 211,770 -2,444
Stantec Inc
STN
10,661 168,726 11,030
Sterling Infrastructure Inc
STRL
10,065 970,814 139,897
Tetra Tech inc
TTEK
9,049 380,843 20,451
Viavi Solutions Inc
VIAV
4,084 318,056 4,222
Vishay Precision Group Inc
VPG
521 130,307 3,465
Willdan Group inc
WLDN
1,588 812,777 51,850
Williams Industrial Services Group Inc
WLMSQ
0 1,661,228 -351,144
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc
WMS
11,639 508,784 78,308
Watts Water Technologies Inc
WTS
9,134 461,804 63,647
SUBTOTAL 750,540 334,247 40,753

What this table shows: Productivity metrics illustrate how effectively a company converts workforce and capital into value. Higher Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee generally reflect stronger operating efficiency and business scalability. First row shows Company's Productivity, followed by it's corporate peers. Click any company name in the table to view its complete financial analysis and comparison.


Tat Technologies Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Table 2: Quick Ratio, Working Capital, Debt/Equity, Asset Turnover

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
QUICK
(Ratio)
WORKING CAPITAL
(Ratio)
DEBT / EQUITY
(Ratio)
ASSET TURNOVER
(Ratio)
Tat Technologies Ltd
TATT
0.19 2.97 0.12 0.93
Abb Ltd
ABBNY
0.32 1.18 0.56 0.79
Aecom
ACM
0.27 1.15 1.00 1.34
Argan Inc
AGX
0.41 1.67 - 1.03
Allient Inc
ALNT
0.63 3.93 0.79 0.88
Ametek Inc
AME
0.21 1.34 0.21 0.47
American Superconductor Corp
AMSC
1.45 2.78 - 0.70
Astronics Corporation
ATRO
0.10 2.84 0.91 1.26
Bwx Technologies Inc
BWXT
0.12 1.83 1.15 0.91
Clearday Inc
CLRD
0.00 0.01 - 0.47
Cpi Aerostructures Inc
CVU
0.08 1.58 0.66 1.00
Ducommun Incorporated
DCO
0.18 2.80 0.35 0.70
Dover Corp
DOV
- 2.04 0.41 0.58
Flowserve Corp
FLS
0.12 2.06 0.68 0.83
Hill International inc
HIL
0.24 1.75 0.58 1.44
Honeywell International Inc
HON
0.51 1.30 1.92 0.53
Hubbell Inc
HUBB
0.24 1.40 0.54 0.81
Huntsman Corporation
HUN
0.25 1.41 0.63 0.81
Iec Electronics Corp
IEC
0.00 1.89 0.99 1.27
Idex Corp
IEX
1.03 2.81 0.49 0.50
Kbr Inc
KBR
0.24 1.12 1.80 1.20
Quaker Chemical Corporation
KWR
0.49 2.45 0.60 0.68
Mativ Holdings Inc
MATV
0.32 2.32 2.06 0.93
Mirion Technologies Inc
MIR
1.43 3.00 0.39 0.31
3m Company
MMM
- 1.64 3.00 0.64
Nuverra Environmental Solutions Inc
NES
0.48 1.91 0.25 0.54
Parker hannifin Corporation
PH
0.07 1.13 0.70 0.68
Piedmont Lithium Inc
PLL
1.74 2.06 0.10 0.32
Plexus Corp
PLXS
0.19 1.55 - 1.30
Parsons Corporation
PSN
0.22 1.45 0.48 1.16
Rockwell Automation Inc
ROK
0.13 1.08 0.96 0.75
Sifco Industries Inc
SIF
0.06 1.20 0.45 0.75
Stantec Inc
STN
0.26 1.41 0.55 0.83
Sterling Infrastructure Inc
STRL
0.71 1.26 0.33 1.02
Tetra Tech inc
TTEK
0.15 1.18 0.52 1.09
Viavi Solutions Inc
VIAV
1.01 1.91 0.93 0.59
Vishay Precision Group Inc
VPG
- 3.82 0.10 0.66
Willdan Group inc
WLDN
0.32 1.55 0.28 1.35
Williams Industrial Services Group Inc
WLMSQ
0.01 1.07 3.11 3.15
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc
WMS
1.38 3.31 0.77 0.78
Watts Water Technologies Inc
WTS
0.73 2.52 0.11 1.21
SUBTOTAL 0.30 1.38 0.90 0.71

Tat Technologies Ltd — Financial Strength vs Peers (Peer Comparison)

This table compares Quick Ratio, Working Capital, Debt-to-Equity, and Asset Turnover for Tat Technologies Ltd and its closest competitors. Only the top peers are shown publicly to ensure fast loading and a clear overview.

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
QUICK
Ratio
WORKING CAPITAL
Ratio
DEBT / EQUITY
Ratio
ASSET TURNOVER
Ratio
Tat Technologies Ltd
TATT
0.19 2.97 0.12 0.93
Abb Ltd
ABBNY
0.32 1.18 0.56 0.79
Aecom
ACM
0.27 1.15 1.00 1.34
Argan Inc
AGX
0.41 1.67 - 1.03
Allient Inc
ALNT
0.63 3.93 0.79 0.88
Ametek Inc
AME
0.21 1.34 0.21 0.47
35 additional peer companies available in the full Financial Strength Comparison dataset.
Unlock Full Competitor List

What this table shows: Financial Strength ratios measure short-term liquidity (Quick Ratio, Working Capital), leverage (Debt/Equity), and operational utilization (Asset Turnover). These indicators highlight how well management allocates resources and maintains financial stability.

Tat Technologies Ltd's Underlying Financial Totals (Revenue, Income, Employees) vs Peers Comparison

Table 3: Revenue (TTM), Net Income (TTM), Net Margin, Employees, ending Q4 2024

COMPANY NAME
TICKER
REVENUE (TTM)
Millions $
NET INCOME (TTM)
Millions $
NET MARGIN
(%)
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
Tat Technologies Ltd
TATT
152.1 11.2 7.34% -
Abb Ltd
ABBNY
32,235 3,824 11.86% 105,000
Aecom
ACM
16,139 636 3.94% 50,000
Argan Inc
AGX
914 174 19.05% 1,595
Allient Inc
ALNT
519 15 2.92% -
Ametek Inc
AME
7,164 1,469 20.5% 21,500
American Superconductor Corp
AMSC
267 15 5.67% 337
Astronics Corporation
ATRO
831 -3 -0.37% 2,500
Bwx Technologies Inc
BWXT
3,059 307 10.04% 6,200
Clearday Inc
CLRD
8 -17 -221.56% -
Cpi Aerostructures Inc
CVU
70 -1 -0.81% 330
Ducommun Incorporated
DCO
807 -35 -4.29% 2,265
Dover Corp
DOV
7,484 3,500 46.77% 25,000
Flowserve Corp
FLS
4,687 475 10.13% 16,000
Hill International inc
HIL
410 -2 -0.54% 4,558
Honeywell International Inc
HON
40,670 6,185 15.21% 95,000
Hubbell Inc
HUBB
5,627 836 14.85% 18,317
Huntsman Corporation
HUN
5,780 -270 -4.67% 6,300
Iec Electronics Corp
IEC
189 4 2.2% 565
Idex Corp
IEX
3,421 477 13.95% 8,800
Kbr Inc
KBR
8,060 368 4.57% 34,000
Quaker Chemical Corporation
KWR
1,866 -9 -0.48% 3,400
Mativ Holdings Inc
MATV
1,985 -437 -22.01% 1,700
Mirion Technologies Inc
MIR
902 28 3.09% 3,000
3m Company
MMM
24,825 3,416 13.76% 85,000
Nuverra Environmental Solutions Inc
NES
97 -26 -26.54% -
Parker hannifin Corporation
PH
20,030 3,641 18.18% 61,120
Piedmont Lithium Inc
PLL
106 -53 -49.98% 13
Plexus Corp
PLXS
4,033 173 4.29% 16,805
Parsons Corporation
PSN
6,495 451 6.94% 22,924
Rockwell Automation Inc
ROK
8,342 749 8.98% 27,000
Sifco Industries Inc
SIF
64 -1 -1.15% 304
Stantec Inc
STN
3,881 254 6.54% 23,000
Sterling Infrastructure Inc
STRL
2,233 322 14.41% 2,300
Tetra Tech inc
TTEK
4,617 248 5.37% 12,124
Viavi Solutions Inc
VIAV
1,145 15 1.33% 3,600
Vishay Precision Group Inc
VPG
300 8 2.66% 2,300
Willdan Group inc
WLDN
651 42 6.38% 801
Williams Industrial Services Group Inc
WLMSQ
299 -63 -21.14% 180
Advanced Drainage Systems Inc
WMS
2,987 460 15.39% 5,870
Watts Water Technologies Inc
WTS
2,355 325 13.78% 5,100
SUBTOTAL 225,553 27,500 12.19% 674,808

What this table shows: These totals provide the raw financial fundamentals behind the productivity, Revenue and Income per Employee ratios above. Revenue, Net Income, and Employee counts reflect the company’s scale, profitability, and workforce size. TTM refers to trailing twelve months.


Methodology & Data Source: Market Capitalization is computed from the latest available share price (delayed up to 15 minutes, depending on exchange rules) multiplied by the company’s diluted share count as reported in its filings. Revenue and Net Income figures used to calculate Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee are sourced directly from quarterly and annual financial statements submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Employee counts are taken from the most recent Form 10-K or 10-Q disclosure and may be updated by companies in subsequent SEC submissions. All fundamentals are processed through CSIMarket.com’s XBRL normalization pipeline, which standardizes reported values across all issuers and periods.

Data lineage: SEC Filings → XBRL Extraction → CSIMarket Normalization → Productivity Metrics.

This table is one of the productivity comparisons available for Tat Technologies Ltd. Across CSIMarket, we provide nine related comparison tables showing how Tat Technologies Ltd performs against its Peers, including additional breakdowns visible through our main navigation bar under:
Stocks → Peers.

This page compares Tat Technologies Ltd to its Peers based on Productivity (Market Cap, Revenue per Employee, and Net Income per Employee).

• For a deeper productivity comparison against its industry peers, visit
Tat Technologies Ltd Productivity vs. Industry

• To review historical productivity trends for this company, including long-term changes in Revenue per Employee and Net Income per Employee, visit
Tat Technologies Ltd Productivity History


Page last updated:

CSIMarket data powering this analysis is available across multiple delivery channels:
Data Downloads (CSV / Excel)
API & Programmatic Data Access
Enterprise Data Licensing
AI Training & Model Development License
Marketplace Distribution Options

All CSIMarket datasets are designed for analytical workflows, financial modeling, academic research, and AI/ML applications requiring normalized, reliable, and longitudinal financial time series.

To download the tables, please subscribe.