Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Swvl Holdings's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Swvl Holdings (SWVLW) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
40.45 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
5.43 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Swvl Holdings vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 24M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Swvl Holdings ranks #150 of 168 companies by market capitalization in the Professional Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Swvl Holdings accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

SWVLW Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Swvl Holdings generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWVLW/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWVLW/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/SWVLW/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Professional Services industry grew revenue 6.8% year over year, combined, vs 40.5% for Swvl Holdings. Swvl Holdings's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Swvl Holdings's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Swvl Holdings Corp Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 100% 100% 100% 100%
Similar-Size Competitors (8) 40% 0% 0% 50%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 62.50 % (5 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 33.30 % (2 of 6)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Swvl Holdings100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Swvl Holdings and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Swvl Holdings's full market share breakdown »

SWVLW Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

SWVLW Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Swvl Holdings's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
0%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(0 of 2)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(0 of 5)
28.6%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Swvl Holdings Corp - -
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Swvl Holdings's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

SWVLW Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

SWVLW High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

SWVLW Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

SWVLW Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

SWVLW Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

SWVLW Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Swvl Holdings's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the mass-transit ridesharing industry, competing primarily with public transportation, taxi companies, traditional private fleet operators, and other ridesharing firms. Notable competitors include Via, Flixbus, and Shuttl. The company offers both business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) products, including Swvl Business (Transportation as a Service) solutions aimed at corporate clients. This range of offerings provides comprehensive commute and travel program solutions, distinguishing the company from competitors that focus on fewer product categories.

Swvl Holdings's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Flixbus Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Via Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Shuttl Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Uber Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Swvl Holdings's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License