Dna X Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dna X Inc (SONM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dna X Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 61M vs 466,823M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Scale: Dna X Inc ranks #49 of 59 companies by market capitalization in the Consumer Electronics industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $15.13M compares with $2.81M for the peer group (5.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Dna X Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Dna X Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Dna X Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Dna X Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | - | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (1) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SONM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
SONM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
SONM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apple Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Dna X Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Dna X Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Dna X Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | 5.88 | 60.53 |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446.36 | 466,823.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 4,979,452.23 | 466,883.53 |
Sources: Dna X Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Dna X Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Dna X Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Kyocera Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Apple Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Datalogic USA, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Panasonic Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| T-Mobile | Named by the company | 85% |
| T-Mobile | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bullitt Group Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Socket Mobile | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zebra Technologies Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Honeywell International Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tait International Limited | Named by the company | 85% |
| Bullitt Mobile Ltd. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sonim | Named by the company | 85% |
| Harris Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| JVC KENWOOD Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Verizon | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Dna X Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Dna X Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Dna X Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | 6 | 15,132,500 | -2,136,750 |
| Apple Inc | 4,979,446 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 4,979,446 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
Dna X Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 54 companies in Dna X Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Dna X Inc ranks #49 of 54 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,781, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Qualcomm Inc | 202,771 | 30.94 % |
| 2 | Sony Group Corporation | 143,483 | 21.90 % |
| 3 | Motorola Solutions inc | 76,160 | 11.62 % |
| 4 | Nokia Corporation | 62,309 | 9.51 % |
| 5 | Ciena Corp | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Ubiquiti Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Ericsson Lm Telephone Co | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Fabrinet | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Viasat Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Planet Labs Pbc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 49 | Dna X Inc | 5 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Dna X Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Dna X Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 44 | Clearone Inc | 13 | -7.59 % |
| 45 | Voip pal com Inc | 12 | -65.64 % |
| 46 | Emerson Radio Corp | 9 | -7.29 % |
| 47 | Silynxcom Ltd | 7 | -28.57 % |
| 48 | Moving Image Technologies Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 49 | Dna X Inc | 5 | -64.39 % |
| 50 | Cambium Networks Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 51 | Algorhythm Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 52 | Integrated Media Technology Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 53 | Sonic Foundry Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 54 | Technical Communications Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Dna X Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Dna X Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Consumer Electronics industry average (65 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 45.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.2x | - |
| P/B | -2.2x | 4.8x | -7.0x |
| Return on Equity | 314.49 % | industry aggregate | 284.95 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 78.53 % | 3.80 % (avg) | 74.73 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Dna X Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -52.83 % | -14.72 % | 27.96 % | 57.27 % | -37.46 % | 3.83 % |
| Operating Margin | 3.98 % | -45.72 % | -69.64 % | -20.46 % | 1.43 % | -57.70 % | -6.43 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 9.77 % | -47.46 % | -114.33 % | -45.58 % | 3.15 % | -134.13 % | 128.23 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | 4.5x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Dna X Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Dna X Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Dna X Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue -0.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Dna X Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,781 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Dna X Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Dna X Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Dna X Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Dna X Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Dna X Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 285.0 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-6.2% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Dna X Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | 0.06 | 0.66 | - |
| Apple Inc | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.99 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dna X Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +27.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +16.3 % | +27.2 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dna X Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | Q2 2026 | - | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.6 % | -29.1 % |
Dna X Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | - | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 35.02% | 60.14% | 142.67% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Dna X Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Dna X Inc | - | 0.10 |
| Apple Inc | 38.90 | 10.67 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 38.62 | 10.67 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.