Scandium International Mining's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Scandium International Mining (SCY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Scandium International Mining vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 0M vs 105,759M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-109.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-12.9%) for its tracked peer group.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.06M compares with $1.05M for the peer group (0.1x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Scandium International Mining vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Scandium International Mining and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Scandium International Mining's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Scandium International Mining's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | No | - | - | Yes |
| Competitors combined (12) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
SCY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nucor Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Steel Dynamics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Reliance Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Commercial Metals Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Mcewen Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Scandium International Mining's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Scandium International Mining's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
In regards to our plan to produce scandium, there are a limited number of scandium producers presently. If we are successful at becoming a producer of scandium, our ability to be competitive will require that we establish a reliable supply of scandium to the market, delivered at purity levels demanded by various applications, and that our operating costs generate margins at prices that will be set by customers and competitors in a market yet to mature.
Publicly Traded Peers of Scandium International Mining Corp
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | 7,868.08 | 0.28 |
| Nucor Corporation | 54,153.36 | 36,101.00 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 32,151.25 | 20,538.68 |
| Reliance Inc | 20,123.81 | 14,835.60 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 6,960.96 | 8,850.09 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 6,446.59 | 19,195.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 130,580.45 | 105,760.04 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Scandium International Mining Corp .
Sources: Scandium International Mining Corp's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Scandium International Mining Corp versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Scandium International Mining's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Nucor Corporation | Steel mills 63.56 % |
| Reliance Inc | Metals Service Centers Segment 100.00 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | North America Steel Group 72.06 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Steelmaking 97.51 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Scandium International Mining's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | 7,868 | 55,444 | -73,769 |
| Nucor Corporation | 54,153 | 1,093,970 | 98,667 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 32,151 | 1,426,297 | 111,065 |
| Reliance Inc | 20,124 | 944,943 | 51,382 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 6,961 | 697,406 | 61,777 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 6,447 | 767,800 | -33,520 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 122,712 | 1,047,334 | 56,884 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
Scandium International Mining's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Steel Dynamics Inc | US 92.24 % |
| Ryerson Holding Corporation | US 92.82 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Scandium International Mining's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Metal Mining industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (73 companies). See the full Metal Mining industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 100.00 % | 44.18 % (avg) | +55.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | 524.27 % | industry median | +566.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -145.86 % | 20.27 % (avg) | -166.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 19.08 % (avg) | -19.1 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Scandium International Mining's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Operating Margin | - | - | - | - | - | - | 198.84 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -71.37 % | 4.05 % | -168.07 % | -104.12 % | 964.80 % | -109.17 % | 54.59 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Scandium International Mining's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 19.08 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Scandium International Mining's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Scandium International Mining's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Scandium International Mining's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Scandium International Mining falls in the High attractiveness / Low strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Scandium International Mining's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 566.1 points above the industry median.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 35.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-109.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 32.8% median pace.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-12.9% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Scandium International Mining's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | 3.90 | 4.01 | - |
| Nucor Corporation | 0.52 | 2.76 | 0.31 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 0.31 | 3.12 | 0.46 |
| Reliance Inc | 0.23 | 4.15 | 0.21 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 0.58 | 2.55 | 0.74 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | 0.02 | 1.97 | 1.29 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Scandium International Mining's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +23.0 % | +81.3 % |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | Q2 2026 | +33.4 % | +76.2 % |
| Reliance Inc | Q1 2026 | +15.5 % | +32.5 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +335.3 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.9 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +22.7 % | +186.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Scandium International Mining's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | Q2 2026 | +15.6 % | -40.1 % |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | Q2 2026 | +30.0 % | -57.0 % |
| Reliance Inc | Q1 2026 | +16.4 % | -26.1 % |
| Commercial Metals Company | Q2 2026 | +17.9 % | +74.6 % |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.0 % | +40.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
Scandium International Mining's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | - | - | - |
| Nucor Corporation | 9.14% | 9.96% | 14.49% |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 9.66% | 10.53% | 17.76% |
| Reliance Inc | 7.64% | 8.27% | 11.18% |
| Commercial Metals Company | 9.30% | 9.96% | 18.10% |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Scandium International Mining's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Scandium International Mining Corp | - | 28,382.19 |
| Nucor Corporation | 18.91 | 1.50 |
| Steel Dynamics Inc | 20.21 | 1.57 |
| Reliance Inc | 25.29 | 1.36 |
| Commercial Metals Company | 11.78 | 0.79 |
| Cleveland cliffs Inc | - | 0.34 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 22.73 | 1.23 |
Sign in to see all peers for Scandium International Mining Corp .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.