Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Radcom Ltd's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Radcom Ltd (RDCM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
Share of combined sales, Q4 2025
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-
Q4 2025
Net Margin
16.77 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Radcom Ltd vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 71M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Radcom Ltd ranks #15 of 22 companies by market capitalization in the Computer Peripherals & Office Equipment industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Radcom Ltd accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

RDCM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Radcom Ltd generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RDCM/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RDCM/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/RDCM/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Radcom Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Radcom Ltd Yes Yes Yes No
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 75% 100% 75% 25%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 20% 80% 50% 20%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 14.30 % (1 of 7)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Radcom Ltd100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Radcom Ltd and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Radcom Ltd's full market share breakdown »

RDCM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

RDCM Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Radcom Ltd's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
75%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(3 of 4)
10%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 10)
57.1%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 7)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Radcom Ltd -26.80 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (7) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Radcom Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

RDCM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

RDCM High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 5) Percent change over the selected range

RDCM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

RDCM Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

RDCM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

RDCM Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Radcom Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The company operates in the network visibility and 5G assurance solutions market, competing with firms including NetScout System Inc., Infovista S.A. (which acquired Empirix Inc.), Elisa Oyj (which acquired Polystar), Anritsu Corporation, Viavi Solutions Inc., and NumoData, Inc. (which acquired EXFO Inc.'s Service Assurance division). Additional competition arises from established and emerging communications, network management, and test equipment companies, as well as traditional network intelligence providers such as Huawei, Ericsson, and Nokia.

Radcom Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Elisa Oyj Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Infovista S.A. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Sandvine Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
EXFO Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NumoData, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Empirix Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
NetScout Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Viavi Solutions Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Anritsu Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Huawei Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Polystar Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ericsson Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nokia Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Radcom Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License