Qumu's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Qumu (QUMU) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Qumu vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 21M vs 2,598,425M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-28.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Qumu generated -14.9% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2022, vs 9.2% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -25.0% net margin compares with 15.4% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Qumu accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.18M compares with $0.98M for the peer group (0.2x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
QUMU Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2022
Qumu reported revenue contraction of 14.85 % year on year in Q3 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.24 %.
With a net margin of -24.99 %, Qumu reported lower profitability than its competitors (15.37 %).
Qumu generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.
Qumu vs. its Competitors, Q3 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Qumu and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Qumu's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.4% year over year, combined, vs -14.9% for Qumu. Qumu's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Qumu's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (36) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
QUMU Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
QUMU Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marvell Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Ringcentral Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Macom Technology Solutions Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Nve Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | On24 Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Qumu's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Qumu's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Qumu Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | 16.31 | 21.45 |
| Apple Inc | 4,880,858.03 | 466,823.00 |
| Alphabet Inc | 4,212,139.80 | 445,866.00 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,870,007.52 | 331,839.00 |
| Amazon com Inc | 2,725,586.46 | 776,231.00 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,724,695.61 | 89,104.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 18,986,590.76 | 2,816,327.28 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Qumu Corporation.
Sources: Qumu Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Qumu Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Qumu's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| On24 Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Brightcove Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sonic Foundry Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pgi Incorporated | Named by the company | 85% |
| Kaltura Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ringcentral Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vimeo Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Qumu's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Qumu's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc | Americas 41.84 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Google Services 85.60 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Amazon com Inc | North America 57.75 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Semiconductor Solutions 64.81 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Qumu's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | 16 | 177,289 | -103,124 |
| Apple Inc | 4,880,858 | 2,812,187 | 776,687 |
| Alphabet Inc | 4,212,140 | 9,645,768 | 5,283,078 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,870,008 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Amazon com Inc | 2,725,586 | 492,532 | 85,838 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,724,696 | 2,700,121 | 1,159,545 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 18,986,574 | 981,693 | 268,193 |
Qumu's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | North America 62.47 % |
| Alphabet Inc | United States 47.77 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Asia Pacific 60.15 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| Marvell Technology Inc | China 43.75 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Qumu's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (347 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 74.79 % | 63.85 % (avg) | +10.9 pp |
| Operating Margin | -64.64 % | industry median | -37.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -55.36 % | 2.76 % (avg) | -58.1 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | - | 4.77 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Qumu's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (347 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 39.4x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 21.7x | - |
| P/B | 1.9x | 5.4x | -3.5x |
| Return on Equity | -172.41 % | industry aggregate | -188.34 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -84.28 % | -0.30 % (avg) | -83.98 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Qumu's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -67.84 % | 29.91 % | -8.05 % | -11.09 % | -11.20 % | 1.40 % | 14.63 % | -17.37 % |
| Operating Margin | -108.31 % | -85.34 % | -35.86 % | -31.49 % | -27.64 % | -20.94 % | -25.12 % | -76.16 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -23.72 % | -35.96 % | -25.12 % | -26.41 % | -34.63 % | -34.80 % | -43.33 % | -47.29 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Qumu's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Qumu's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Qumu is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Qumu's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Qumu falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Qumu's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+2.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 37.9 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 188.3 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (40.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-28.8% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Qumu's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | 0.64 | 1.03 | - |
| Apple Inc | 0.26 | 0.96 | 0.99 |
| Alphabet Inc | 0.55 | 2.13 | 0.13 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Amazon com Inc | 0.38 | 1.07 | 0.21 |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.99 | 2.05 | 0.75 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Qumu's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | Q3 2022 | -14.8 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +16.4 % | +27.1 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q2 2026 | +24.2 % | +297.9 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Amazon com Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.9 % | +244.9 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.5 % | +216.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +17.3 % | +128.8 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Qumu's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | Q3 2022 | -20.3 % | - |
| Apple Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.6 % | -29.1 % |
| Alphabet Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +100.1 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Amazon com Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.5 % | +300.3 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +74.0 % | +274.6 % |
Qumu's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | - | - | - |
| Apple Inc | 35.02% | 60.14% | 142.67% |
| Alphabet Inc | 35.42% | 42.01% | 50.84% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Amazon com Inc | 15.21% | 23.40% | 30.50% |
| Broadcom Inc | 21.57% | 24.07% | 43.74% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Qumu's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Qumu Corporation | - | 0.76 |
| Apple Inc | 38.13 | 10.46 |
| Alphabet Inc | 17.19 | 9.45 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.93 | 11.66 |
| Amazon com Inc | 20.10 | 3.51 |
| Broadcom Inc | 44.96 | 19.36 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 24.68 | 6.74 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.