Natura And Co Holding S A's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Natura And Co Holding S A (NTCO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Natura And Co Holding S A vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5,358M vs 12,708M combined for tracked competitors (29.7% combined share).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Natura And Co Holding S A vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Natura And Co Holding S A reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Natura And Co Holding S A and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Natura And Co Holding S A's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (2) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
NTCO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
NTCO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
NTCO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ulta Beauty Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Natura And Co Holding S A's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Natura and co Holding S a
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | 9,094.66 | 5,357.71 |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 27,453.76 | 12,708.31 |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | 0.07 | 9.90 |
| SUBTOTAL | 36,548.49 | 18,075.92 |
Sources: Natura and co Holding S a's official press releases and company reports; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the company reports and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Natura and co Holding S a versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Natura And Co Holding S A reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Est e Lauder Companies Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Avon | Company report | 85% |
| Dss Inc | Company report | 85% |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | Company report | 85% |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Natura And Co Holding S A's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from Natura And Co Holding S A reports (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ulta Beauty Inc | Reportable Segment Aggregation Before Other Operating Segment 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Natura And Co Holding S A's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | 9,095 | - | - |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 27,454 | 189,620 | 17,739 |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | 0 | - | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 27,454 | 189,767 | 17,676 |
Natura And Co Holding S A's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Personal & Household Products industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (53 companies). See the full Personal & Household Products industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 0.00 % | 39.76 % (avg) | -39.8 pp |
| Operating Margin | -0.58 % | industry median | -13.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -19.64 % | 6.60 % (avg) | -26.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 2.44 % (avg) | -2.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Personal & Household Products industry average (53 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Personal & Household Products industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 2.8x | 26.5x | -23.7x |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 16.8x | - |
| P/B | - | 4.4x | - |
| Return on Equity | 12.51 % | industry aggregate | -11.43 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.27 % | 8.60 % (avg) | -8.87 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | -18.43 % | -3.70 % | -5.57 % |
| Operating Margin | 1.77 % | -1.31 % | -0.58 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 0.76 % | -0.62 % | -0.27 % |
| P/E | - | - | 2.8x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Natura And Co Holding S A's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Natura And Co Holding S A is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Natura And Co Holding S A's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -5.6% and operating margin of -0.6% compares with an average of -4.9% growth and -1.3% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Natura And Co Holding S A sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 2.44 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments. Supplier power and buyer power are not assessed here -- see Natura And Co Holding S A's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages for concentration data; threat of substitutes has no systematic data source in this system and is not estimated.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Natura And Co Holding S A falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Natura And Co Holding S A's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 13.4 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 11.4 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of tracked competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | 0.36 | 1.54 | 0.28 |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 0.11 | 1.36 | 0.10 |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | 0.08 | 0.52 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | Q4 2023 | -5.6 % | - |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | Q1 2026 | +11.1 % | +11.6 % |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | Q2 2022 | -13.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | 0.0 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Natura And Co Holding S A's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | Q4 2023 | -15.2 % | - |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | Q1 2026 | +9.3 % | -26.3 % |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | Q2 2022 | -6.8 % | - |
Natura And Co Holding S A's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | 6.77% | 9.14% | 12.51% |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 17.27% | 25.62% | 44.77% |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Natura And Co Holding S A's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Natura and co Holding S a | 3.06 | 1.70 |
| Ulta Beauty Inc | 23.48 | 2.16 |
| Sharing Services Global Corporation | - | 0.01 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 20.53 | 2.02 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.