Mcgraw Hill Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Mcgraw Hill Inc (MH) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Mcgraw Hill Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 2,117M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Scale: Mcgraw Hill Inc ranks #25 of 92 companies by market capitalization in the Internet Services & Social Media industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Mcgraw Hill Inc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MH Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2026
Mcgraw Hill Inc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Internet Services & Social Media industry grew revenue 19.3% year over year, combined, vs 2.7% for Mcgraw Hill Inc. Mcgraw Hill Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.20% to 0.17%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Mcgraw Hill Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mcgraw Hill Inc | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 60.00 % (3 of 5) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MH Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MH Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MH Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MH Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
Mcgraw Hill Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Mcgraw Hill Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| AMBOSS | Named by the company | 85% |
| Houghton Mifflin Harcourt | Named by the company | 85% |
| Wolters Kluwer | Named by the company | 85% |
| Curriculum Associates | Named by the company | 85% |
| RELX | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amplify | Named by the company | 85% |
| Macmillan Learning | Named by the company | 85% |
| Stride Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Elsevier | Named by the company | 85% |
| Savvas | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cengage | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pearson | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Mcgraw Hill Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Mcgraw Hill Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Mcgraw Hill Inc | Higher Education 52.01 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).