Monogram Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Monogram Technologies Inc (MGRM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | - | - | - | No |
| Competitors combined (29) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (5) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MGRM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MGRM Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenon Medical Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Bioventus Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Johnson and Johnson | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Si bone inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Paragon 28 inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Monogram Technologies Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Monogram technologies inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | 213.07 | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 645,992.07 | 97,929.00 |
| Medtronic Plc | 110,891.28 | 37,542.00 |
| Stryker Corp | 106,300.54 | 25,837.00 |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 49,858.43 | 6,512.50 |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 17,126.42 | 8,508.80 |
| SUBTOTAL | 967,661.55 | 194,760.69 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Monogram technologies inc .
Sources: Monogram technologies inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Monogram technologies inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| ConforMIS, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Stryker Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| restor3d, Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Johnson & Johnson | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Monogram Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Johnson and Johnson | Oncology 29.26 % |
| Medtronic Plc | CARDIOVASCULAR 38.34 % |
| Stryker Corp | MedSurg and Neurotechnology 55.02 % |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | United States 57.64 % |
| Globus Medical Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Monogram Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | 213 | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 645,992 | 695,518 | 149,411 |
| Medtronic Plc | 110,891 | 395,179 | 55,463 |
| Stryker Corp | 106,301 | 461,375 | 66,589 |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 49,858 | 407,031 | 62,725 |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 17,126 | 500,518 | 47,476 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 967,448 | 508,681 | 79,450 |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Monogram Technologies Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Johnson and Johnson | United States 57.42 % |
| Medtronic Plc | United States 49.83 % |
| Stryker Corp | United States 75.26 % |
| Globus Medical Inc | United States 79.61 % |
| Alphatec Holdings Inc | US 94.22 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Monogram Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 222 companies in Monogram Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Monogram Technologies Inc ranks #0 of 222 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 584, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 145,289 | 13.39 % |
| 2 | Medtronic Plc | 110,891 | 10.22 % |
| 3 | Stryker Corp | 106,301 | 9.80 % |
| 4 | 3m Company | 85,752 | 7.91 % |
| 5 | Boston Scientific Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Becton Dickinson And Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Dexcom Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Resmed Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Alcon inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Monogram technologies inc | 213 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Monogram Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2025-10-06.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (288 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 34.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.6x | - |
| P/B | 9.4x | 4.7x | +4.6x |
| Return on Equity | -137.21 % | industry aggregate | -146.32 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -53.46 % | -2.30 % (avg) | -51.16 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 584 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Monogram Technologies Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Monogram Technologies Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Monogram Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 146.3 points below the industry aggregate.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-7.0% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | 4.74 | 5.06 | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 0.37 | 1.05 | 0.60 |
| Medtronic Plc | 0.15 | 2.10 | 0.57 |
| Stryker Corp | 0.48 | 1.99 | 0.68 |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1.74 | 4.14 | 0.06 |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 0.25 | 1.93 | 0.60 |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q2 2026 | +6.6 % | -0.1 % |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | +41.3 % |
| Stryker Corp | Q2 2026 | +9.4 % | +44.3 % |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | -27.2 % |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +4.8 % | +30.1 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +7.7 % | +11.8 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Monogram Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | Q2 2025 | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | Q2 2026 | +5.5 % | +26.7 % |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.8 % | -0.2 % |
| Stryker Corp | Q2 2026 | -4.1 % | +10.4 % |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.1 % | +35.7 % |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.3 % | +45.3 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
Monogram Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | - | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 10.60% | 13.30% | 25.74% |
| Medtronic Plc | 5.71% | 6.46% | 10.64% |
| Stryker Corp | 7.89% | 8.80% | 16.36% |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 7.41% | 8.39% | 9.65% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 3.51% | 3.97% | 6.36% |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Monogram Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Monogram technologies inc | - | - |
| Johnson and Johnson | 30.64 | 6.60 |
| Medtronic Plc | 253.79 | 2.95 |
| Stryker Corp | 28.54 | 4.11 |
| Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 49.69 | 7.66 |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 21.61 | 2.01 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 31.83 | 4.97 |
Sign in to see all peers for Monogram technologies inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.