Wm Technology Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Wm Technology Inc (MAPS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Wm Technology Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 171M vs 15,640M combined for its competitors (1.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (-0.9% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.2%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Wm Technology Inc generated -5.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 29.8% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.8% net margin compares with 83.6% for the peer group.
- Scale: Wm Technology Inc ranks #167 of 256 companies by market capitalization in the Software & Programming industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Wm Technology Inc accounted for 1.1% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 1.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.38M compares with $1.22M for the peer group (0.3x).
- Structure: Wm Technology Inc operates in the following segments: Reportable.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
MAPS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Wm Technology Inc reported revenue contraction of 5.35 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 29.77 %.
With a net margin of 6.79 %, Wm Technology Inc reported lower profitability than its competitors (83.58 %).
Wm Technology Inc generated 1.06 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 1.45 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Wm Technology Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Wm Technology Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Wm Technology Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Wm Technology Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.7% year over year, combined, vs -5.4% for Wm Technology Inc. Wm Technology Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.02% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Wm Technology Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Yes | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 28.60 % (2 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
MAPS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
MAPS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
MAPS Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
MAPS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shopify Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Yelp Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Leafly Holdings Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Wm Technology Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Wm Technology Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Wm Technology Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Wm Technology Inc |
31.22 | 171.25 |
 Shopify Inc |
191,892.34 | 14,167.00 |
 Yelp Inc |
1,112.29 | 1,473.00 |
 Leafly Holdings Inc |
0.82 | 32.80 |
 Leafbuyer Technologies Inc |
0.16 | 4.48 |
| SUBTOTAL | 193,036.84 | 15,848.53 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Wm Technology Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Wm Technology Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Wm Technology Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Yelp | Company report | 85% |
| Shopify | Company report | 85% |
| Company report | 85% | |
| Lightspeed | Company report | 85% |
| DoorDash | Company report | 85% |
| Jane Technologies | Company report | 85% |
| Dutchie | Company report | 85% |
| Leafly | Company report | 85% |
| Square | Company report | 85% |
| SpringBig | Company report | 85% |
| SpringBig | Company report | 85% |
| Leaflink | Company report | 85% |
| Leaf Trade | Company report | 85% |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Wm Technology Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Wm Technology Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Yelp Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | Retail Segment 88.12 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Wm Technology Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | 31 | 381,401 | 7,096 |
| Shopify Inc | 191,892 | 1,864,079 | 596,711 |
| Yelp Inc | 1,112 | 285,024 | 24,479 |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | 1 | 295,486 | -46,315 |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | 0 | 373,419 | -3,834 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 193,006 | 1,216,142 | 361,207 |
Wm Technology Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Yelp Inc | United States 99.48 % |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | US 96.09 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Wm Technology Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 230 companies in Wm Technology Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Wm Technology Inc ranks #167 of 230 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,887, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Microsoft Corporation | 4,046,606 | 52.71 % |
| 2 | Palantir Technologies Inc | 424,657 | 5.53 % |
| 3 | Oracle Corporation | 339,160 | 4.42 % |
| 4 | Sap Se | 313,734 | 4.09 % |
| 5 | Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Shopify Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Salesforce Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Servicenow Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Cloudflare Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 167 | Wm Technology Inc | 31 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Wm Technology Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-11-09.
Wm Technology Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 162 | Marketwise Inc | 59 | 32.22 % |
| 163 | Foresight Autonomous Holdings Ltd | 57 | -91.49 % |
| 164 | Intellicheck Inc | 42 | -51.33 % |
| 165 | Skillsoft Corp | 34 | -67.18 % |
| 166 | Skkynet Cloud Systems Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 167 | Wm Technology Inc | 31 | -71.75 % |
| 168 | Visionwave Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 169 | Zedge Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 170 | Aether Holdings Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 171 | Cango inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 172 | Clps Incorporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Wm Technology Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-11-09. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Wm Technology Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (442 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 94.72 % | 50.49 % (avg) | +44.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -0.76 % | industry median | -0.9 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 9.80 % | 1.86 % (avg) | +7.9 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 7.86 % | 5.22 % (avg) | +2.6 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Wm Technology Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (442 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 19.8x | 40.5x | -20.8x |
| EV / EBITDA | -0.8x | 20.3x | -21.1x |
| P/B | 0.3x | 5.5x | -5.2x |
| Return on Equity | 2.36 % | industry aggregate | -22.80 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.35 % | -3.25 % (avg) | 2.90 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Wm Technology Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2021 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | -12.78 % | -1.85 % | -5.32 % |
| Operating Margin | - | -9.82 % | 7.99 % | 0.44 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -5.19 % | 4.33 % | 0.21 % |
| P/E | - | - | 14.7x | 48.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Wm Technology Inc's Strategic Group Map
Wm Technology Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Wm Technology Inc's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -6.8% and operating margin of -0.8% compares with an average of -2.8% growth and -0.9% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Wm Technology Inc sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Wm Technology Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
See Methodology: BCG Growth-Share Matrix for how relative share and growth are calculated and thresholded.
Wm Technology Inc falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 11.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Microsoft Corporation alone holds 53% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Wm Technology Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 2,887 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 7.86 % vs industry average 5.22 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Wm Technology Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Wm Technology Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Wm Technology Inc falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Wm Technology Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 22.8 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.3% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (19.8x vs 40.5x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Microsoft Corporation, holding 52.71 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Wm Technology Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | 1.78 | 2.56 | - |
| Shopify Inc | 1.19 | 5.56 | - |
| Yelp Inc | 0.93 | 2.38 | 0.08 |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | 0.37 | 0.47 | - |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | 0.51 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wm Technology Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.4 % | +33.5 % |
| Shopify Inc | Q3 2026 | +31.6 % | -19.2 % |
| Yelp Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.4 % | -28.2 % |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | Q1 2025 | -12.9 % | - |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | Q1 2026 | -34.7 % | -40.7 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +27.5 % | -19.7 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Wm Technology Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.7 % | +66.7 % |
| Shopify Inc | Q3 2026 | +39.3 % | - |
| Yelp Inc | Q2 2026 | +17.9 % | +13.2 % |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | Q1 2025 | -17.8 % | +65.4 % |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | Q1 2026 | -43.0 % | - |
Wm Technology Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | 1.68% | 1.36% | 2.36% |
| Shopify Inc | 31.04% | 34.27% | 35.29% |
| Yelp Inc | 12.80% | 15.93% | 18.61% |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | - | - | - |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Wm Technology Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | 13.81 | 0.18 |
| Shopify Inc | 90.65 | 13.55 |
| Yelp Inc | 9.69 | 0.76 |
| Leafly Holdings Inc | - | 0.03 |
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | 0.04 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 41.43 | 12.18 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.