Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Leafbuyer Technologies Inc (LBUY) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Leafbuyer Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs 171M combined for its competitors (2.5% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is holding steady (+0.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs holding steady (+1.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Leafbuyer Technologies Inc generated -34.7% revenue growth year over year in Q3 2026, vs -2.4% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 12.4% net margin compares with 3.9% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Leafbuyer Technologies Inc accounted for 2.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 3.7% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.37M compares with $0.57M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LBUY Sales vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc reported revenue contraction of 34.70 % year on year in Q3 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue change of -2.36 %.
With a net margin of 12.35 %, Leafbuyer Technologies Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (3.89 %).
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc generated 2.53 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 3.73 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Leafbuyer Technologies Inc reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Leafbuyer Technologies Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Consulting Services industry grew revenue 9.9% year over year, combined, vs -34.7% for Leafbuyer Technologies Inc. Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (2) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LBUY Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Tide inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Wm Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Leafbuyer Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Leafbuyer Technologies Inc |
0.16 | 4.48 |
 High Tide inc |
216.95 | 424.27 |
 Wm Technology Inc |
31.22 | 171.25 |
| SUBTOTAL | 248.33 | 600.00 |
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Leafbuyer Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from Leafbuyer Technologies Inc reports and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Company report | 85% |
| High Tide inc | Company report | 85% |
Company report basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Wm Technology Inc | Reportable 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | 0 | 373,419 | -3,834 |
| High Tide inc | 217 | 707,110 | -61,193 |
| Wm Technology Inc | 31 | 381,401 | 7,096 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 248 | 567,698 | -31,963 |
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 34 companies in Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Leafbuyer Technologies Inc ranks #0 of 34 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,797, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cgi Inc | 17,750 | 32.51 % |
| 2 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 10,258 | 18.79 % |
| 3 | Genpact Limited | 7,204 | 13.19 % |
| 4 | Fti Consulting Inc | 5,683 | 10.41 % |
| 5 | Exponent Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Huron Consulting Group Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Astrana Health Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Icf International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Onterris Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Bowman Consulting Group Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-07-17.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Consulting Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (54 companies). See the full Consulting Services industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 45.87 % | 23.84 % (avg) | +22.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | -1.09 % | industry median | -3.5 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 13.49 % | -1.23 % (avg) | +14.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 4.44 % (avg) | -4.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Consulting Services industry average (54 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Consulting Services industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 23.9x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.3x | 12.1x | -7.8x |
| P/B | -1.0x | 2.7x | -3.7x |
| Return on Equity | - | industry aggregate | - |
| Return on Invested Capital | - | -0.47 % (avg) | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 20.30 % | 58.01 % | 9.23 % | 28.07 % | 41.27 % | 16.04 % | 21.06 % | -19.66 % |
| Operating Margin | -374.94 % | -252.17 % | -115.82 % | -69.54 % | -12.23 % | -18.29 % | - | 1.55 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 834.98 % | -144.02 % | -196.40 % | - | 25.98 % | - | - | - |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 1,797 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 4.44 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / High strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
No rule matched.
Weaknesses
No rule matched.
Opportunities
- A meaningful share of competitors (50.00 %) show financial-distress signals, a possible opening to gain share.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | 0.51 | - |
| High Tide inc | 0.48 | 1.37 | 0.13 |
| Wm Technology Inc | 1.78 | 2.56 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | Q1 2026 | -34.7 % | -40.7 % |
| High Tide inc | Q3 2025 | +10.5 % | - |
| Wm Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | -5.4 % | +33.5 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +8.7 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | Q1 2026 | -43.0 % | - |
| High Tide inc | Q3 2025 | +12.5 % | +19.3 % |
| Wm Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.7 % | +66.7 % |
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| High Tide inc | - | - | - |
| Wm Technology Inc | 1.68% | 1.36% | 2.36% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Leafbuyer Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Leafbuyer Technologies Inc | - | 0.04 |
| High Tide inc | - | 0.51 |
| Wm Technology Inc | 13.81 | 0.18 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.41 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.