Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Lyondellbasell Industries N V (LYB) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Lyondellbasell Industries N V vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 31,192M vs 1,394,584M combined for tracked competitors (2.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+17.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+28.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Lyondellbasell Industries N V generated 19.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 47.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 6.1% net margin compares with 12.2% for the peer group.
- Scale: Lyondellbasell Industries N V ranks #6 of 83 companies by market capitalization in the Chemical Manufacturing industry, holding 3.6% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Lyondellbasell Industries N V accounted for 2.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 2.5% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $1.64M compares with $3.61M for the peer group (0.5x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
LYB Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Lyondellbasell Industries N V reported revenue growth of 19.84 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 47.35 %.
With a net margin of 6.09 %, Lyondellbasell Industries N V reported lower profitability than its competitors (12.17 %).
Lyondellbasell Industries N V generated 2.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 2.45 % a year earlier.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Lyondellbasell Industries N V and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (3) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Lyondellbasell Industries N V's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Chemical Manufacturing industry grew revenue 2.6% year over year, combined, vs 19.8% for Lyondellbasell Industries N V. Lyondellbasell Industries N V's share of combined industry revenue moved from 8.38% to 9.79%, a gain of 1.41 percentage points.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (55) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (6) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (10) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 42.90 % (3 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
LYB Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
LYB Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
LYB Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
LYB Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blue Dolphin Energy Co | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Dupont De Nemours Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Valero Energy Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Pbf Energy Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Flotek Industries Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Lyondellbasell Industries N V's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Our refining competitors are major integrated oil companies, refineries owned
or controlled by foreign governments and independent domestic refiners. Based
on published data, there were 143 operable crude oil refineries in the U.S.,
and total U.S. refinery capacity was approximately 17.8 million barrels per
day. The Houston refinery processed an average of approximately 232,000 barrels
per day of crude oil, representing approximately 1.3% of all U.S. crude processing
capacity.
Our refining operations compete for the purchases of crude oil based on price
and quality. Supply disruptions could impact the availability and pricing. We
compete in gasoline and distillate markets as a bulk supplier of fungible products
satisfying industry and government specifications. Competition is based on price
and location.
The markets for fuel products tend to be volatile as well as cyclical as a result
of the changing global economy and changing crude oil and refined product prices.
Crude oil prices are impacted by worldwide political events, the economics of
exploration and production and refined products demand. Prices and demand for
fuel products are influenced by seasonal and short-term factors such as weather
and driving patterns, as well as by longer term issues such as the economy,
energy conservation and alternative fuels. Industry fuel products supply is
dependent on short-term industry operating capabilities and on long-term refining
capacity.
A crack spread is a benchmark indication of refining margins based on the processing of a specific type of crude oil into an assumed selection of refined products. The Houston refinery generally tracks the Maya 2-1-1 crack spread, which represents the difference between the first month futures price of two barrels of Maya crude oil as set by Pemex and one barrel each of U.S. Gulf Coast 87 Octane Conventional Gasoline and U.S. Gulf Coast Ultralow-sulfur Diesel (“ULSD”). While these benchmark refining spreads are generally indicative of the level of profitability at the Houston refinery and similarly configured refineries, there are many other factors specific to each refinery and the industry in general, such as the cost of Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) and the value of by-products, which influence operating results.
Publicly Traded Peers of Lyondellbasell Industries N v
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 18,823.42 | 31,192.00 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400.22 | 368,757.00 |
| Chevron Corp | 407,361.69 | 215,261.00 |
| Conocophillips | 153,044.70 | 63,345.00 |
| Valero Energy Corp | 114,533.58 | 139,397.00 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 112,937.60 | 153,577.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 2,081,871.57 | 1,731,732.60 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Sources: Lyondellbasell Industries N v's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Lyondellbasell Industries N v versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Westlake Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| W R Grace and co | Named by the company | 85% |
| Danimer Scientific Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dow Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Valero Energy Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Westlake Chemical Partners Lp | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Lyondellbasell Industries N V's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | Olefins and Polyolefins - Americas 38.37 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Corporate and Unallocated 0.20 % |
| Chevron Corp | Reportable Segment, Aggregation before Other Operating 99.73 % |
| Valero Energy Corp | Refining 95.14 % |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Refining and Marketing 94.83 % |
| Phillips 66 | Refining 69.25 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 18,823 | 1,644,280 | -18,239 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 678,400 | 6,357,879 | 575,414 |
| Chevron Corp | 407,362 | 5,001,533 | 487,116 |
| Conocophillips | 153,045 | 6,398,485 | 936,263 |
| Valero Energy Corp | 114,534 | 14,208,236 | 777,699 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 112,938 | 8,301,459 | 557,351 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 2,063,048 | 3,608,559 | 245,760 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Phillips 66 | United States 79.26 % |
| Occidental Petroleum Corporation | Non-US 20.75 % |
| Ppg Industries Inc | North America 35.64 % |
| Dupont De Nemours Inc | United States 44.47 % |
| Rpm International Inc | US 68.55 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 79 companies in Lyondellbasell Industries N V's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Lyondellbasell Industries N V ranks #6 of 79 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 3.61 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,024, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 217,945 | 41.32 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 62,697 | 11.89 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 52,519 | 9.96 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 23,742 | 4.50 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 19,048 | 3.61 % |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Lyondellbasell Industries N V's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linde Plc | 217,945 | -0.97 % |
| 2 | Air Products And Chemicals Inc | 62,697 | 5.88 % |
| 3 | Corteva Inc | 52,519 | 16.89 % |
| 4 | Ppg Industries Inc | 23,742 | 1.81 % |
| 5 | International Flavors and Fragrances Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 19,048 | 20.39 % |
| 7 | Rpm International Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Element Solutions Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Westlake Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Newmarket Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 11 | Axalta Coating Systems Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Lyondellbasell Industries N V's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Chemical Manufacturing industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (96 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.76 % | 30.74 % (avg) | -18.0 pp |
| Operating Margin | 3.09 % | industry median | +0.1 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 4.43 % | 3.22 % (avg) | +1.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 4.47 % | 7.98 % (avg) | -3.5 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Chemical Manufacturing industry average (96 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 27.8x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.4x | 16.1x | +8.2x |
| P/B | 2.0x | 3.9x | -1.9x |
| Return on Equity | -3.34 % | industry aggregate | -6.14 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 2.63 % | 0.90 % (avg) | 1.73 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 17.85 % | -10.97 % | -20.08 % | 66.37 % | 9.27 % | -26.40 % | -1.96 % | -25.18 % |
| Operating Margin | 13.41 % | 11.85 % | 5.62 % | 14.67 % | 10.11 % | 6.98 % | 4.66 % | -1.39 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 15.97 % | 12.38 % | 4.28 % | 15.98 % | 12.60 % | 7.25 % | 4.44 % | -1.20 % |
| P/E | 7.3x | 9.6x | 20.6x | 0.1x | 0.2x | 0.1x | 18.9x | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Lyondellbasell Industries N V's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Lyondellbasell Industries N V is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Lyondellbasell Industries N V's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.09x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 3.4% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Linde Plc alone holds 41% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,024 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 4.47 % vs industry average 7.98 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Lyondellbasell Industries N V's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Lyondellbasell Industries N V's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+17.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 6.1 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.09x).
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Linde Plc, holding 41.32 % of industry market cap.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | 0.39 | 1.63 | 1.52 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 0.13 | 1.11 | 0.17 |
| Chevron Corp | 0.01 | 1.16 | 0.21 |
| Conocophillips | 0.49 | 1.36 | 0.45 |
| Valero Energy Corp | 0.35 | 1.61 | 0.32 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 0.18 | 1.25 | 1.69 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | Q2 2026 | +19.8 % | +386.1 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | +42.3 % | +97.5 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +56.3 % | +385.6 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +36.8 % | +98.8 % |
| Valero Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +48.8 % | +514.3 % |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Q2 2026 | +53.8 % | +244.0 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +24.8 % | +135.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | Q2 2026 | +3.9 % | -49.9 % |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | Q2 2026 | - | +3.9 % |
| Chevron Corp | Q2 2026 | +36.3 % | +22.3 % |
| Conocophillips | Q2 2026 | +32.0 % | - |
| Valero Energy Corp | Q2 2026 | +36.2 % | - |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | Q2 2026 | +43.4 % | +70.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | - | - | - |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 7.29% | 7.92% | 12.57% |
| Chevron Corp | 6.40% | 6.49% | 10.85% |
| Conocophillips | 7.55% | 8.36% | 14.30% |
| Valero Energy Corp | 12.54% | 16.22% | 28.12% |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 11.79% | 12.26% | 42.47% |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Lyondellbasell Industries N V's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Lyondellbasell Industries N v | - | 0.60 |
| Exxon Mobil Corporation | 20.97 | 1.84 |
| Chevron Corp | 19.59 | 1.89 |
| Conocophillips | 16.72 | 2.42 |
| Valero Energy Corp | 16.21 | 0.82 |
| Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 13.44 | 0.74 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 18.03 | 1.20 |
Sign in to see all peers for Lyondellbasell Industries N v .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.