Knife River's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Knife River (KNF) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Knife River vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,308M vs 13,588M combined for tracked competitors (19.6% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+19.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Knife River generated 12.6% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 13.5% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 4.7% net margin compares with 2.0% for the peer group.
- Scale: Knife River ranks #14 of 37 companies by market capitalization in the Construction Raw Materials industry, holding 1.1% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Knife River accounted for 18.8% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 18.9% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.62M compares with $0.74M for the peer group (0.8x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
KNF Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Knife River reported revenue growth of 12.57 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 13.53 %.
With a net margin of 4.68 %, Knife River achieved higher profitability than its competitors (2.01 %).
Knife River generated 18.80 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 18.93 % a year earlier.
Knife River vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Knife River and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (5) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Knife River's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Construction Raw Materials industry grew revenue 11.9% year over year, combined, vs 12.6% for Knife River. Knife River's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.15% to 1.15%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.
Knife River's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Competitors combined (4) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 62.50 % (5 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
KNF Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
KNF Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
KNF Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
KNF Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Granite Construction Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Vulcan Materials Company | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Eagle Materials Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Knife River's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Knife River's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Knife River Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | 3,035.58 | 3,307.50 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 32,294.88 | 8,062.40 |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,544.35 | 6,295.00 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 5,467.53 | 2,324.93 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 5,065.05 | 4,968.05 |
| SUBTOTAL | 75,407.40 | 24,957.88 |
Sources: Knife River Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Knife River Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Knife River's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Granite Construction, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Eagle Materials, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amrize Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| CRH plc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Heidelberg Materials | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Construction Partners, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Holcim | Named by the company | 85% |
| Summit Materials Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Knife River's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Knife River's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | Central 34.69 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Aggregates 78.46 % |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Building Materials Business 89.50 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Cement 58.05 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Constructions 84.01 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Knife River's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | 3,036 | 624,292 | -4,041 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 32,295 | 686,279 | 94,884 |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,544 | 669,681 | 261,383 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 5,468 | 929,974 | 161,030 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 5,065 | 856,559 | -24,076 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 72,372 | 735,207 | 130,217 |
Knife River's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 35 companies in Knife River's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Knife River ranks #14 of 35 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.07 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,083, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Crh Public Limited Company | 56,012 | 19.78 % |
| 2 | Cemex Sab De Cv | 42,304 | 14.94 % |
| 3 | Vulcan Materials Company | 32,295 | 11.41 % |
| 4 | Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 29,544 | 10.43 % |
| 5 | Teck Resources Limited | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Amrize Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Chemical and Mining Co Of Chile Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | James Hardie Industries Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Eagle Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 14 | Knife River Corporation | 3,036 | 1.07 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Knife River's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Knife River's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | Hecla Mining Company | 11,497 | 49.13 % |
| 10 | Eagle Materials Inc | 5,468 | -22.37 % |
| 11 | Mdu Resources Group Inc | 3,922 | 8.82 % |
| 12 | United States Lime and Minerals Inc | 3,203 | -12.60 % |
| 13 | Centrus Energy Corp | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 14 | Knife River Corporation | 3,036 | -25.05 % |
| 15 | Elevra Lithium Limited | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 16 | Energy Fuels Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 17 | Titan America Sa | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 18 | Tecnoglass Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 19 | Cementos Pacasmayo Saa | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Knife River's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Knife River's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Construction Raw Materials industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (45 companies). See the full Construction Raw Materials industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 17.83 % | 29.19 % (avg) | -11.4 pp |
| Operating Margin | 8.32 % | industry median | -3.7 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.21 % | 8.38 % (avg) | -0.2 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 8.15 % | 12.01 % (avg) | -3.9 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Knife River's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Construction Raw Materials industry average (45 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Construction Raw Materials industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 32.9x | 26.6x | +6.3x |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.8x | 14.0x | +7.8x |
| P/B | 2.9x | 2.6x | +0.2x |
| Return on Equity | -1.34 % | industry aggregate | -15.86 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.16 % | 0.69 % (avg) | 4.47 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Knife River's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | - | 2.43 % | 8.52 % |
| Operating Margin | 10.47 % | 10.91 % | 9.09 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 8.98 % | 8.49 % | 5.72 % |
| P/E | - | 28.6x | 26.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Knife River's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Knife River's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Knife River is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Knife River's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Knife River's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Knife River falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.05x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 5.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.
Knife River's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 1,083 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 8.15 % vs industry average 12.01 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Knife River's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Knife River's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Knife River's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Knife River falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Knife River's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.5% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 15.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.05x).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
No rule matched.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Knife River's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | 0.02 | 2.56 | 0.85 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 0.20 | 2.24 | 0.52 |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 0.11 | 2.37 | 0.54 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 0.56 | 3.10 | 1.01 |
| Granite Construction Inc | 0.30 | 1.12 | 1.36 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Knife River's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | Q2 2026 | +12.6 % | -63.0 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Q1 2026 | +7.4 % | +28.3 % |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +7.5 % | -23.5 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +2.6 % | -17.2 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Q2 2026 | +29.4 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +11.7 % | -62.6 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Knife River's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | Q2 2026 | +14.7 % | -52.6 % |
| Vulcan Materials Company | Q1 2026 | +5.0 % | +5.1 % |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +30.3 % | -28.5 % |
| Eagle Materials Inc | Q2 2026 | +9.0 % | +58.7 % |
| Granite Construction Inc | Q2 2026 | +31.4 % | +3.2 % |
Knife River's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | - | - | - |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 6.62% | 6.46% | 13.03% |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 12.41% | 12.99% | 23.06% |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 11.16% | 11.07% | 27.04% |
| Granite Construction Inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Knife River's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Knife River Corporation | 21.78 | 0.92 |
| Vulcan Materials Company | 29.30 | 4.01 |
| Martin Marietta Materials Inc | 12.06 | 4.69 |
| Eagle Materials Inc | 13.95 | 2.35 |
| Granite Construction Inc | - | 1.02 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 19.78 | 3.02 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.