Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ituran Location And Control Ltd (ITRN) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Ituran Location And Control Ltd vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 359M vs 33,265M combined for tracked competitors (1.1% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-5.4%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Ituran Location And Control Ltd generated 6.8% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2025, vs -0.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 16.7% net margin compares with -11.7% for the peer group.
- Scale: Ituran Location And Control Ltd ranks #4 of 11 companies by market capitalization in the Electronic Parts & Equipment industry, holding 1.2% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Ituran Location And Control Ltd accounted for 4.4% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 4.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.12M compares with $0.32M for the peer group (0.4x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ITRN Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Ituran Location And Control Ltd reported revenue growth of 6.77 % year on year in Q4 2025, above its competitors' combined revenue change of -0.91 %.
With a net margin of 16.71 %, Ituran Location And Control Ltd achieved higher profitability than its competitors (-11.67 %).
Ituran Location And Control Ltd generated 4.37 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 4.06 % a year earlier.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Ituran Location And Control Ltd and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (7) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Ituran Location And Control Ltd's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Electronic Parts & Equipment industry grew revenue 31.1% year over year, combined, vs 6.8% for Ituran Location And Control Ltd. Ituran Location And Control Ltd's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.80% to 1.47%, a loss of 0.33 percentage points.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (3) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (8) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 87.50 % (7 of 8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
ITRN Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
ITRN Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
ITRN Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
ITRN Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ryder System Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Avis Budget Group Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Hertz Global Holdings inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ituran Location And Control Ltd's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We face strong competition for our services and products in each market in
which we operate. We compete primarily on technology edge, functionality, ease
of use, quality, price, service availability, geographic coverage, track record
of recovery rates and response times and financial strength.
Location-based services
We compete with a variety of companies in each of our markets. The three major
technologies utilized by our competitors are GPS/cellular, network-based cellular
and radio frequency-based homing systems. In addition, new competitors utilizing
other technologies may continue to enter the market.
Stolen vehicle recovery
Israel. Our primary competitors in Israel are Pointer and Skylock Ltd.
Brazil. Brazil is a highly fragmented market with many companies selling competing
products and services (including immobilizers and other less-sophisticated vehicle
security systems). Our main competitors in Brazil are Sascar, Zatix and AutoTrack.
Argentina. Argentina is also a highly fragmented market with many companies
selling competing products and services (including immobilizers and other less-sophisticated
vehicle security systems). Our main competitors in Argentina are LoJack Corporation
and Megatrans S.A..
United States. In the United States, there are several major companies offering
various theft protection and recovery products that compete with our product
and service offerings, including LoJack Corporation, OnStar Corporation, Spireon
(which also includes SysLocate and GoldStar), PassTime, Guide Point, Sky Patrol,
Sky Guard, I-Metrik SVR and Position Plus.
We believe that we are a leading provider of location-based services in Israel,
as we are deemed a monopoly in this field; however, we are unable to provide
specific market share information in the markets of our operations for various
reasons, including the broad range of services and products that compete in
these markets, the non-existence of trade publications with respect to the products
and services we offer in such markets and the lack of meaningful or accurate
market research or data available to us.
Fleet Management
The vehicle fleet management market is highly fragmented with many corporations
offering location products and services. Our major competitors in Israel are
Pointer, ISR, Traffilog and Skylock; our major competitors in the United States
are GPS Insight, Trimble, Network Fleet, Street Eagle, FleetMatics, Navtrack,
Teletrac, Trim Track, FleetBoss, PassTime and Spireon; our major competitors
in Brazil are Sascar, Zatix and AutoTrack; and our major competitors in Argentina
are LoJack Corporation, Megatrans SA., G4S, Sitrac S.A., American Tracer, Ubicar
S.A. and Sky Cop.
Wireless communications products
Our AVL system for automatic vehicle location is based on terrestrial network
triangulation technology and primarily competes with companies that use one
of three main technologies: GPS/GPRS (in combination with wireless communication),
network-based cellular communication and radio frequency-based homing.
Although AVL products based on GPS, network-based cellular and homing technologies
do not require the construction of a separate infrastructure of base stations
as with terrestrial network triangulation systems such as ours, such solutions
have certain drawbacks. GPS receivers require line of sight to at least three
satellites, which reduces their effectiveness in areas where the satellite signals
are subject to interference and “noise” (such as urban areas, buildings
or parking garages, forests and other enclosed or underground spaces). GPS and
network-based cellular systems are also prone to jamming since the tracking
signal receivers are located in the vehicle and can be easily tampered with.
In addition, the satellites utilized by GPS devices are managed by the United
States Department of Defense and can be subject to forced temporary outages.
The main disadvantage of homing systems is that they provide only the general
direction and not the precise location of the end-unit. In addition, homing
systems require that the vehicle be reported stolen before the tracking signal
can be activated, which may result in a delay between vehicle theft and recovery.
Terrestrial network triangulation systems have succeeded in overcoming some
of the challenges faced by systems based on other technologies. Terrestrial
network triangulation technology does not require line of sight and the signals
are not easily interrupted in densely populated or obstructed areas. Also, the
signals are transmitted from the end-unit in the vehicle to a network of base
stations. Therefore, in order to jam the system, receivers in each individual
base station within range of the end-unit would have to be jammed, which is
difficult to accomplish. Additionally, since the primary application of terrestrial
network triangulation systems in the AVL industry is vehicle location and not
continuous two-way communication, short bursts of data are sufficient for tracking
purposes, which enable the network of base stations to be deployed at a much
lower density in the coverage area than traditional network-based cellular base
stations. Terrestrial network triangulation systems are capable of determining
the precise location, and not just the general direction, of a vehicle at any
moment in time. Furthermore, when connected with the existing theft protection
system in the vehicle, terrestrial network triangulation systems automatically
alert the control center when a vehicle is stolen and do not require that the
vehicle be reported stolen, which can potentially reduce stolen vehicle recovery
times to a few minutes. The main disadvantage of terrestrial network triangulation
systems is the necessity to deploy a physical infrastructure, including the
construction, development and deployment of a network of base stations and a
control center and the need to address the various financial, legal and practical
issues associated with such deployment. Any such deployment entails an investment
of a sizable amount of money prior to the receipt of any revenues.
Publicly Traded Peers of Ituran Location And Control Ltd
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 1,019.54 | 359.02 |
| Ryder System Inc | 8,912.82 | 12,818.00 |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | 3,711.09 | 11,752.00 |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | 529.09 | 8,695.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 14,172.53 | 33,624.02 |
Sources: Ituran Location And Control Ltd's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Ituran Location And Control Ltd versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| LoJack Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| OnStar Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Megatrans SA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Skylock Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Ituran Location And Control Ltd's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | Location Based Services 73.69 % |
| Ryder System Inc | Fleet Management Solutions 46.61 % |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | Americas 76.74 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 1,020 | 123,080 | 20,568 |
| Ryder System Inc | 8,913 | 248,411 | 9,612 |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | 3,711 | 470,080 | -29,000 |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | 529 | 334,423 | -3,808 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 13,153 | 324,220 | -3,197 |
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | IL 54.62 % |
| Ryder System Inc | United States 92.53 % |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | Americas 76.74 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 9 companies in Ituran Location And Control Ltd's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Ituran Location And Control Ltd ranks #4 of 9 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 1.21 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 5,742, indicating a highly concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Te Connectivity plc | 62,910 | 73.79 % |
| 2 | Arrow Electronics inc | 11,953 | 14.02 % |
| 3 | Avnet Inc | 8,462 | 9.93 % |
| 4 | Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 1,028 | 1.21 % |
| 5 | Eaco Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Richardson Electronics Ltd | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Surge Components Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Universal Safety Products inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Taitron Components Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | First America Resources Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Ituran Location And Control Ltd's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Te Connectivity plc | 62,910 | 1.57 % |
| 2 | Arrow Electronics inc | 11,953 | 94.63 % |
| 3 | Avnet Inc | 8,462 | 98.17 % |
| 4 | Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 1,028 | 47.46 % |
| 5 | Eaco Corporation | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 6 | Richardson Electronics Ltd | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Surge Components Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Universal Safety Products inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Taitron Components Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Ituran Location And Control Ltd's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Electronic Parts & Equipment industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (14 companies). See the full Electronic Parts & Equipment industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 49.74 % | 27.20 % (avg) | +22.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | 21.45 % | industry median | +19.3 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 26.19 % | -1.52 % (avg) | +27.7 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 6.07 % | 1.82 % (avg) | +4.3 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Electronic Parts & Equipment industry average (14 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Electronic Parts & Equipment industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 13.4x | 19.0x | -5.6x |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.1x | 14.2x | -7.1x |
| P/B | 3.6x | 2.1x | +1.5x |
| Return on Equity | 27.58 % | industry aggregate | 15.48 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 15.66 % | 11.06 % (avg) | 4.60 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 9.18 % | 5.09 % | 6.77 % |
| Operating Margin | 20.61 % | 21.17 % | 21.45 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 16.31 % | 17.10 % | 15.66 % |
| P/E | 11.0x | 10.5x | 13.4x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Ituran Location And Control Ltd's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Ituran Location And Control Ltd is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Ituran Location And Control Ltd's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.02x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 14.5% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Te Connectivity plc alone holds 74% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Low | Industry HHI of 5,742 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 6.07 % vs industry average 1.82 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Ituran Location And Control Ltd's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Ituran Location And Control Ltd's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 19.3 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 15.5 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.02x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 14.5% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (13.4x vs 19.0x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Te Connectivity plc, holding 73.79 % of industry market cap.
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-5.4% annualized).
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 1.04 | 2.28 | - |
| Ryder System Inc | 0.06 | 0.78 | 3.85 |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | 0.18 | 0.73 | - |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | 0.30 | 0.80 | - |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | Q4 2025 | +6.8 % | +6.1 % |
| Ryder System Inc | Q2 2026 | +5.0 % | +1.5 % |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | Q1 2026 | +4.1 % | - |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | Q1 2026 | +10.5 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +6.1 % | - |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | Q4 2025 | +2.7 % | +59.7 % |
| Ryder System Inc | Q2 2026 | +49.9 % | -41.2 % |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | Q1 2026 | -37.1 % | - |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | Q1 2026 | +5.5 % | -96.0 % |
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 15.53% | 21.86% | 27.58% |
| Ryder System Inc | 3.04% | 3.11% | 16.70% |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | - | - | - |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | - | - | - |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Ituran Location And Control Ltd's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Ituran Location And Control Ltd | 17.57 | 2.84 |
| Ryder System Inc | 18.78 | 0.70 |
| Avis Budget Group Inc | - | 0.32 |
| Hertz Global Holdings inc | - | 0.06 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | - | 0.42 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.