Intel's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Intel (INTC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Intel vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 57,032M vs 1,131,194M combined for tracked competitors (4.8% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+19.8%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Intel generated 25.4% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2026, vs 44.4% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -68.4% net margin compares with 44.1% for the peer group.
- Scale: Intel ranks #5 of 117 companies by market capitalization in the Semiconductors industry, holding 4.7% of industry market cap.
- Peer revenue share: Intel accounted for 4.5% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 5.2% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.67M compares with $1.07M for the peer group (0.6x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
INTC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Intel reported revenue growth of 25.42 % year on year in Q2 2026, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 44.44 %.
With a net margin of -68.41 %, Intel reported lower profitability than its competitors (44.07 %).
Intel generated 4.54 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 5.20 % a year earlier.
Intel vs. its Competitors, Q2 2026
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Intel and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (18) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar-Size Competitors (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Intel's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Semiconductors industry grew revenue 10.5% year over year, combined, vs 25.4% for Intel. Intel's share of combined industry revenue moved from 2.52% to 2.86%, a gain of 0.34 percentage points.
Intel's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | No | Yes | No | No |
| Competitors combined (36) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (29) | ||||
| Similar-Size Competitors (9) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
INTC Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
INTC Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
INTC Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors
INTC Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Netlist Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Micron Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Applied Optoelectronics Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Silicom Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Intel's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Intel's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Intel faces significant competition in the development and market acceptance of technologies and products in this environment. Our platforms, based on Intel architecture, are positioned to compete across the spectrum of Internet-connected computing devices, from the lowest-power portable devices to the most powerful data center servers.
We are a leading provider in the PC and server segments, where we face existing and emerging competition. In the PC segment, smaller mobile devices, such as tablets and smartphones, offered by numerous vendors have become significant competitors to PCs for many usages. Most of these small devices currently use applications processors based on the ARM* architecture; feature low-power, long battery-life operation; and are built in SoC formats which integrate numerous functions on one chip. In the server segment, our data center products and platforms face emerging competition from many new entrants using ARM architecture or other technologies.
We are a relatively new entrant to the segments for tablets, smartphones and
similar mobile devices. We have adjusted our product roadmaps to emphasize the
development of low-power SoC chips for these and other devices. The boundaries
between the various segments are changing as the industry evolves and new segments
emerge.
We have a long-standing position as a supplier of components and software for
embedded products and this marketplace is significantly expanding with increasing
types and numbers of Internet-connected devices for industrial, commercial and
consumer uses, which we refer to as the Internet of Things. We face numerous
large and small incumbent competitors as well as new entrants in this growing
market segment that use ARM architecture as well as other operating systems
and software.
Our products primarily compete based on performance, energy efficiency, integration,
innovative design, features, price, quality, reliability, brand recognition
and availability. The importance of these items will vary by the type of end
system for the products. For example, performance might be among the most important
factors for our products for servers, while price and integration might be among
the most important factors for our products for tablets and smartphones.
We are the owner of McAfee, a major provider of digital security products and
services to businesses and consumers. There are numerous competitors offering
security products and services, and we seek to offer competitive differentiation
by integrating hardware and software security features in many of our offerings
and to have security offerings in numerous market segments including mobile
and embedded devices and for data centers.
The ability of our products to operate on multiple operating systems in end-user
products and platforms operated or sold by third parties, including OEMs, is
a key competitive advantage. We seek to optimize our products for multiple operating
systems and invest substantial resources working with third parties to do so,
but such investments are risky given that it is not clear which products will
succeed in the market.
We have competitors in each of the market segments including other companies
that make and sell microprocessors, SoCs, other silicon components, software
and platforms to businesses which build and sell computing and communications
devices to end-users. We also compete against others selling these goods and
services to businesses that utilize the products for their internal processes
(e.g., businesses running large data centers). We also face competition from
OEMs that, to some degree, choose to vertically integrate their own proprietary
semiconductor and software assets. By doing so, these OEMs may be attempting
to offer greater differentiation in their products and to increase their share
of the profits for each finished product they sell.
Continuing changes in the industry such as acquisitions, business collaborations
or licensing scenarios (such as injunctions or other litigation outcomes), could
have a significant impact on our competitive position.
One of our important competitive advantages is the combination of our network
of manufacturing, assembly and test facilities with our global architecture
design teams. We have made significant capital and research and development
(R&D) investments into this integrated manufacturing network, which enables
us to have more direct control over our processes, quality control, product
cost, production timing, performance, power consumption, and manufacturing yield.
The increased cost of constructing new fabrication facilities supporting smaller
transistor geometries and larger wafers has led to a smaller pool of companies
that can afford to build and equip leading-edge manufacturing facilities. Most
of our competitors rely on third-party foundries and subcontractors such as
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. and GlobalFoundries Inc. for
manufacturing and assembly and test needs. We have recently started providing
foundry services as an alternative to such foundries.
Publicly Traded Peers of Intel Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | 592,217.12 | 57,032.00 |
| Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865.10 | 302,969.00 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,216.66 | 331,839.00 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,708,348.59 | 89,104.00 |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1,206,807.10 | 90,274.00 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,008,456.33 | 40,524.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 15,695,111.48 | 1,246,849.64 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Intel Corporation.
Sources: Intel Corporation's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Intel Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Intel's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Gsi Technology Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Applied Optoelectronics Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Quicklogic Corp | Named by the company | 85% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Trans lux Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Aerwins Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Apple Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lightwave Logic Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Supercom Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Xilinx Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ambarella Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| SK hynix | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nxp Semiconductors N v | Named by the company | 85% |
| Silicom Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tower Semiconductor Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Corsair Gaming Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| NVIDIA | Named by the company | 85% |
| Micron Technology Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Splunk Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ase Technology Holding Co Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Lam Research Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| One Stop Systems Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Skywater Technology Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Western Digital Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Applied Materials Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dsp Group Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Qualcomm Inc. | Named by the company | 85% |
| Microvision Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Rigetti Computing Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Pmc Sierra Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Quantum Computing Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Broadcom Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Intel's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Intel's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | Client Computing Group 56.91 % |
| Nvidia Corp | Compute and Networking 91.34 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Semiconductor Solutions 64.81 % |
| Micron Technology Inc | CMBU 33.21 % |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | Data Center 57.80 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Intel's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | 592,217 | 670,176 | -133,690 |
| Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865 | 7,213,548 | 4,592,357 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,795,217 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Broadcom Inc | 1,708,349 | 2,700,121 | 1,159,545 |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1,206,807 | 1,703,283 | 952,245 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,008,456 | 1,307,226 | 207,548 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 15,102,894 | 1,072,337 | 434,639 |
Intel's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Nvidia Corp | United States 78.13 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Asia Pacific 60.15 % |
| Asml Holding Nv | Rest of Europe and Middle East 1.43 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Intel's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 109 companies in Intel's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Intel ranks #5 of 109 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 4.72 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 2,373, indicating a moderately concentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865 | 44.31 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 14.22 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,206,807 | 9.62 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,008,456 | 8.04 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 592,217 | 4.72 % |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Intel's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-28.
Intel's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance
Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.| Rank | Company | Market Cap | TTM Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nvidia Corp | 5,557,865 | 30.89 % |
| 2 | Broadcom Inc | 1,783,853 | 37.93 % |
| 3 | Micron Technology Inc | 1,206,807 | 579.86 % |
| 4 | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1,008,456 | 282.99 % |
| 5 | Intel Corporation | 592,217 | 247.88 % |
| 6 | Applied Materials Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 7 | Arm Holdings Plc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 8 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 9 | Marvell Technology Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
| 10 | Analog Devices Inc | 1,234 | 12.3% |
Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Intel's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.
Intel's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Semiconductors industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (151 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 27.19 % | 34.40 % (avg) | -7.2 pp |
| Operating Margin | -0.14 % | industry median | -3.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 4.45 % | 7.07 % (avg) | -2.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 21.22 % | 9.39 % (avg) | +11.8 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Intel's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Semiconductors industry average (151 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 43.3x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | 216.4x | 22.7x | +193.7x |
| P/B | 4.4x | 6.6x | -2.2x |
| Return on Equity | -9.66 % | industry aggregate | -56.49 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -0.03 % | -0.16 % (avg) | 0.13 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Intel's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 12.89 % | 1.58 % | 8.20 % | 1.49 % | -20.21 % | -14.00 % | -2.08 % | -0.47 % |
| Operating Margin | 32.91 % | 30.62 % | 30.41 % | 24.62 % | 3.70 % | 0.17 % | -21.99 % | -4.19 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 12.82 % | 11.80 % | 11.56 % | 8.81 % | 0.94 % | 0.04 % | -4.28 % | -0.79 % |
| P/E | 10.6x | 12.6x | 10.1x | 10.5x | 14.6x | 120.3x | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Intel's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Intel's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Intel is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Intel's BCG Growth-Share Matrix
Relative market share (vs Intel's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.
Intel falls in the Question Mark quadrant: relative market share of 0.11x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 10.3% (median, trailing 12 months).
Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution. A caveat worth reading alongside this chart: Nvidia Corp alone holds 44% of this industry's market cap. In an industry this dominated by one leader, the framework will place nearly every OTHER company in "Dog" or "Question Mark" purely because relative share is measured against that leader, regardless of how strong those other companies actually are on their own fundamentals. Check the Profitability, Valuation and Financial Strength sections above before treating this quadrant label as a verdict.
Intel's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | Moderate | Industry HHI of 2,373 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | High (capital intensive) | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 21.22 % vs industry average 9.39 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Intel's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Intel's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Intel's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Intel falls in the Medium attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Selective.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Intel's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+13.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Outperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Weaknesses
- Return on equity 56.5 points below the industry aggregate.
- Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.11x).
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 10.3% median pace.
Threats
- Industry dominated by Nvidia Corp, holding 44.31 % of industry market cap.
- High capital intensity requires continuous reinvestment just to keep pace with the industry.
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Intel's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | 0.44 | 1.86 | 0.40 |
| Nvidia Corp | 0.40 | 4.07 | 0.09 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Broadcom Inc | 0.99 | 2.05 | 0.75 |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.02 | 2.91 | 0.17 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.48 | 2.61 | 0.05 |
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Intel's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | Q2 2026 | +25.4 % | - |
| Nvidia Corp | Q2 2026 | +105.9 % | +125.9 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +85.5 % | +216.1 % |
| Micron Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +345.7 % | +1,398.3 % |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | Q2 2026 | +55.4 % | +163.4 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +46.4 % | +100.3 % |
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Intel's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.2 % | -28.0 % |
| Nvidia Corp | Q2 2026 | +86.8 % | +41.3 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Broadcom Inc | Q2 2026 | +74.0 % | +274.6 % |
| Micron Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +10.5 % | +166.4 % |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | Q2 2026 | +138.3 % | +186.5 % |
Intel's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | - | - | - |
| Nvidia Corp | 81.41% | 95.06% | 110.11% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Broadcom Inc | 21.57% | 24.07% | 43.74% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 49.92% | 56.57% | 70.55% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 8.10% | 9.43% | 10.07% |
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Intel's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corporation | - | 10.38 |
| Nvidia Corp | 28.97 | 18.34 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.37 | 11.44 |
| Broadcom Inc | 44.53 | 19.17 |
| Micron Technology Inc | 23.85 | 13.37 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 156.26 | 24.89 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 33.33 | 12.59 |
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.