Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Ferroglobe Plc's Competitiveness

Name: Ferroglobe Plc Competitors and Peer Comparison
Creator: CSIMarket
License: https://csimarket.com/help/terms-of-use

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Ferroglobe Plc (GSM) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025

Competitors Tracked

Publicly traded peers

Peer Group Market Share

100.00 %

vs 100.00 % a year ago

Revenue Growth Y/Y

-18.79 %

Q4 2025

Net Margin

-13.27 %

Q4 2025

Key Findings: Ferroglobe Plc vs Its Competitors

TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1,335M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Scale: Ferroglobe Plc ranks #63 of 155 companies by market capitalization in the Metal Mining industry, holding 0.1% of industry market cap.
Peer revenue share: Ferroglobe Plc accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

GSM Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Ferroglobe Plc generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSM/competitors                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSM/relationships                    

                        https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/GSM/similar                    

Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Pull these exact ratios programmatically

Get an API key License this feed for redistribution / AI →

Download as CSV

Commercial Data Licensing & OEM

Annual commercial subscriptions for corporate use, internal BI systems, management reporting, AI integration, and client-facing platforms

API & Data Feeds

Programmatic access to normalized fundamentals & ratios.

AI Integration via MCP

Connect Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible AI assistant directly to this data.

For context: the Metal Mining industry grew revenue 21.0% year over year, combined, vs -18.8% for Ferroglobe Plc. Ferroglobe Plc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.65% to 0.43%, a loss of 0.21 percentage points.

Ferroglobe Plc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity	Profitable	Expanding	Above Industry Growth	Distressed
Ferroglobe Plc	No	No	No	Yes
Similar-Size Competitors (7)
Similar Growth & Profitability (8)	25.00 % (2 of 8)	50.00 % (4 of 8)	0.00 % (0 of 8)	25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

GSM Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

GSM Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Ferroglobe Plc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.

Similar-Size
(4 of 9)

Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 6)

Entity	TTM Share Price Return (group: median)	vs U.S.A. 500
Ferroglobe Plc	-9.00 %	Underperformed
Competitors combined (0)	40.4%	63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9)	40.4%	63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6)	40.4%	63.2%

Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Ferroglobe Plc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Unlock Commercial Access

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

GSM Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

GSM Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

GSM Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

GSM Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Ferroglobe Plc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

Ferroglobe operates in a competitive environment influenced by trade wars with key trading partners, which may result in increased tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff barriers. These trade restrictions can disrupt supply chains, increase input costs, and limit access to critical export markets, potentially leading to reduced sales volumes, loss of market share, and weakened long-term customer relationships. Competitors not affected by such trade measures may strengthen their presence in Ferroglobe's markets, creating a competitive disadvantage for the company. Additionally, Ferroglobe's level of indebtedness may restrict its financial flexibility and ability to invest or pursue strategic acquisitions compared to less-indebted competitors. Market perceptions shaped by analysts' coverage and shareholder activism may also impact Ferroglobe's competitive position and share price.