Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Fullnet Communications Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fullnet Communications Inc (FULO) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2023
Competitors Tracked
1
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.00 %
vs 0.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
-72.71 %
Peers: 2.07 %
Net Margin
36.24 %
Peers: 28.36 %

Key Findings: Fullnet Communications Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4M vs 466,823M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-73.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs accelerating (+2.5%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Fullnet Communications Inc generated -72.7% revenue growth year over year in Q4 2023, vs 2.1% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 36.2% net margin compares with 28.4% for the peer group.
  • Scale: Fullnet Communications Inc ranks #48 of 58 companies by market capitalization in the Communications Services industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Fullnet Communications Inc accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 0.0% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.42M compares with $2.81M for the peer group (0.1x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

FULO Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023

Fullnet Communications Inc reported revenue contraction of 72.71 % year on year in Q4 2023, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 2.07 %.

With a net margin of 36.24 %, Fullnet Communications Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (28.36 %).

Fullnet Communications Inc generated 0.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 0.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FULO/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FULO/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FULO/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Fullnet Communications Inc vs. its Competitors, Q4 2023

Revenue growth, year on year

Fullnet Communications Inc -72.7 %
Competitors combined +2.1 %

Net income growth, year on year

Fullnet Communications Inc -16.8 %
Competitors combined +13.1 %

Net margin

Fullnet Communications Inc +36.2 %
Competitors combined +28.4 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Fullnet Communications Inc -73.3 %
Competitors combined +2.5 %

TTM net margin

Fullnet Communications Inc +12.7 %
Competitors combined +27.6 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Fullnet Communications Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Fullnet Communications Inc $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (3) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Fullnet Communications Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Communications Services industry grew revenue 7.4% year over year, combined, vs -72.7% for Fullnet Communications Inc. Fullnet Communications Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.00% to 0.00%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Fullnet Communications Inc Yes No No No
Competitors combined (1) 100% 100% 100% 0%
High-Confidence Competitors (2) 50% 100% 100% 0%
Similar-Size Competitors (10) 14% 71% 71% 38%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 87.50 % (7 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 25.00 % (2 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2023

0%market share
  • Fullnet Communications Inc0.0%
  • Competitors combined100.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Fullnet Communications Inc and its 1 tracked competitors.

See Fullnet Communications Inc's full market share breakdown »

FULO Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

FULO Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Fullnet Communications Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
100%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(1 of 1)
100%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(1 of 1)
16.7%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(1 of 6)
0%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(0 of 4)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Fullnet Communications Inc -12.80 % Underperformed
Competitors combined (1) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (1) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (6) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (4) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fullnet Communications Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

FULO Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

FULO High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 2) Percent change over the selected range

FULO Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

FULO Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

FULO Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

FULO Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Apple Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fullnet Communications Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The market for Internet-based services, particularly mass text and voice message delivery solutions, is highly fragmented, competitive, and continuously evolving. The company competes with a range of established and emerging firms, including Twilio, Inc., Everbridge, Inc., OnSolve, LLC, Call-Em-All, Inc., Callfire, Inc., OnTimeTelecom, Inc., and EZ Texting. Key competitive factors include extensive, user-friendly features, a reliable network, knowledgeable sales personnel, and quality technical support, with price generally being a secondary consideration. The company considers its ability to attract customers and market value-added services critical to future success and profitability, although there is no assurance that competitors will not introduce comparable or more attractively priced products or services.

Publicly Traded Peers of Fullnet Communications Inc

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Fullnet Communications Inc 6.68 4.19 0.53 10
Apple Inc 4,979,446.36 466,823.00 128,930.00 166,000
SUBTOTAL 4,979,453.04 466,827.19 128,930.53 166,010

Sources: Fullnet Communications Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Fullnet Communications Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Everbridge, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Call-Em-All, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
OnTimeTelecom, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
EZ Texting Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Callfire, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Twilio, Inc. Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
OnSolve, LLC Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Apple Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fullnet Communications Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Apple Inc Americas 41.84 % Europe 26.87 % Greater China 17.20 %

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

Fullnet Communications Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Fullnet Communications Inc 7 419,108 53,214
Apple Inc 4,979,446 2,812,187 776,687
PEERS TOTAL 4,979,446 2,812,187 776,687

Fullnet Communications Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure

Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 56 companies in Fullnet Communications Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.

Fullnet Communications Inc ranks #48 of 56 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 1,244, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).

Rank Company Market Cap Industry Share
1 Verizon Communications Inc 194,869 19.10 %
2 T mobile Us Inc 178,928 17.54 %
3 At and t Inc 174,299 17.08 %
4 Veon ltd 132,379 12.98 %
5 America Movil Sab De Cv 1,234 5.2%
6 Tim S a 1,234 5.2%
7 Vodafone Group Public Limited Company 1,234 5.2%
8 Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd 1,234 5.2%
9 Ast Spacemobile Inc 1,234 5.2%
10 Millicom International Cellular Sa 1,234 5.2%
48 Fullnet Communications Inc 7 0.00 %
Full Industry Market Structure

Market cap and industry share for the rest of Fullnet Communications Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Same-Size Peers & Stock Performance

Peers chosen by closeness in market-cap rank within the same industry classification (not the named-competitor list above). Trailing 12-month total return, 3-month price momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio vs the broad U.S. market.
Rank Company Market Cap TTM Return 3M Momentum Beta Sharpe (1Y)
43 Elauwit Connection inc 45 - -2.44 % - 0.28
44 Nextplat Corp 25 13.33 % 32.09 % 1.24 0.54
45 Wytec International Inc 17 -33.02 % 21.95 % -0.34 0.51
46 Anghami Inc 10 27.20 % 8.31 % 0.55 0.69
47 Fabric ai Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
48 Fullnet Communications Inc 7 -12.82 % 6.25 % 0.37 0.17
49 Our Bond Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
50 Cleartronic Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
51 Iqstel Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
52 Surgepays Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
53 Aerkomm Inc 1,234 12.3% 4.5% 1.10 0.80
Full Same-Size Peer Performance

Market cap, return, momentum, beta and Sharpe ratio for the rest of Fullnet Communications Inc's same-size peers requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation); returns and risk metrics as of 2026-09-28. Beta and Sharpe ratio are versus the broad U.S. equity market, not this industry.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Communications Services industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (85 companies).
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 74.88 % 45.44 % (avg) +29.4 pp
Operating Margin 12.22 % industry median +6.8 pp
EBITDA Margin 16.14 % 4.17 % (avg) +12.0 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 0.00 % 14.44 % (avg) -14.4 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Communications Services industry average (85 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 5.7x 25.6x -19.9x
EV / EBITDA 1.2x 12.5x -11.3x
P/B 2.4x 3.6x -1.2x
Return on Equity 33.46 % industry aggregate 27.49 %
Return on Invested Capital 15.83 % 4.49 % (avg) 11.34 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20152016201820192020202120222023
Revenue Growth 7.08 %3.67 %4.27 %16.93 %44.68 %20.23 %17.03 %-14.95 %
Operating Margin -2.04 %0.48 %-0.71 %8.35 %20.85 %31.73 %13.05 %12.22 %
Return on Invested Capital 1.74 %-0.41 %0.88 %-148.65 %126.48 %49.84 %21.11 %15.83 %
P/E -----19.8x9.6x5.7x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Fullnet Communications Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Fullnet Communications Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)TLKFRPOTELCALLFullnet Communications IncSPOKUSMOUCLNTLS

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Fullnet Communications Inc's BCG Growth-Share Matrix

Relative market share (vs Fullnet Communications Inc's largest competitor by market cap) against industry revenue growth, using the standard textbook thresholds (1.0x share, 10% growth) a common framework, not a precision instrument.

Question Mark Star Dog Cash Cow Relative Market Share (vs largest competitor) Industry Revenue Growth (%) Fullnet Communications Inc

Fullnet Communications Inc falls in the Dog quadrant: relative market share of 0.00x vs its largest competitor, in an industry growing revenue 0.4% (median, trailing 12 months).

Source: CSIMarket API (market-cap share and industry revenue growth). The 10% growth and 1.0x share lines are standard textbook thresholds, not derived from this industry's own distribution.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Competitive Rivalry High Industry HHI of 1,244 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above)
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 14.44 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Fullnet Communications Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Fullnet Communications Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Fullnet Communications Inc
Harvest / Divest

Fullnet Communications Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Fullnet Communications Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 6.8 points above the industry median.
  • Return on equity 27.5 points above the industry aggregate.

Weaknesses

  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-73.3% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
  • Low relative market share vs the industry leader (0.00x).

Opportunities

  • Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (5.7x vs 25.6x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.

Threats

No rule matched.

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Fullnet Communications Inc 1.77 1.79 - 1.25
Apple Inc 0.26 0.96 0.99 1.27

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Fullnet Communications IncQ4 2023-72.7 %-78.7 %-16.8 %-12.0 %
Apple Inc Q2 2026+16.4 %-1.6 %+27.1 %+0.7 %
PEERS TOTAL+16.4 %-1.6 %+27.1 %+0.7 %

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Fullnet Communications Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Fullnet Communications IncQ4 2023----
Apple Inc Q2 2026+8.6 %-3.1 %-29.1 %-

Fullnet Communications Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Fullnet Communications Inc15.85%32.33%33.46%1,970.19-
Apple Inc 35.02%60.14%142.67%13.2232.75

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Fullnet Communications Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Fullnet Communications Inc9.911.590.2717.734.12
Apple Inc 38.9010.671.091,520.4446.31
PEERS AVERAGE38.6210.671,520.2746.31

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.