Fitell's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fitell (FTEL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Fitell vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 5M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Fitell accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
FTEL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Fitell generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Recreational Products industry grew revenue 1.1% year over year, combined, vs 40.6% for Fitell. Fitell's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.06% to 0.09%, a gain of 0.02 percentage points.
Fitell's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fitell Corporation | - | - | - | - |
| High-Confidence Competitors (11) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
FTEL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
FTEL Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
Fitell's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Fitell's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Equinox+ | Named by the company | 85% |
| Garmin vivofit® | Named by the company | 85% |
| Mirror | Named by the company | 85% |
| Strava | Named by the company | 85% |
| Whoop | Named by the company | 85% |
| BeachBody | Named by the company | 85% |
| FitScope | Named by the company | 85% |
| JaxJox | Named by the company | 85% |
| NIKE® Training Club | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tempo | Named by the company | 85% |
| Apple Fitness+ | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fitbit® | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hydrow | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nautilus | Named by the company | 85% |
| Sufferfest Training Systems | Named by the company | 85% |
| Zwift | Named by the company | 85% |
| Echelon | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fulgaz Video Cycling | Named by the company | 85% |
| Johnson Health Tech | Named by the company | 85% |
| Peloton | Named by the company | 85% |
| Tonal | Named by the company | 85% |
| At Home Workouts by Daily Burn | Named by the company | 85% |
| FitOn | Named by the company | 85% |
| ICON Health & Fitness (NordicTrack) | Named by the company | 85% |
| NeoU | Named by the company | 85% |
| Technogym | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oura | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fitell's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.