Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery

Fbs Global Limited's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Fbs Global Limited (FBGL) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q4 2025
Competitors Tracked
-
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
100.00 %
vs 100.00 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
84.26 %
Q4 2025
Net Margin
-7.87 %
Q4 2025

Key Findings: Fbs Global Limited vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 19M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
  • Scale: Fbs Global Limited ranks #30 of 38 companies by market capitalization in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, holding 0.0% of industry market cap.
  • Peer revenue share: Fbs Global Limited accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

FBGL Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025

Fbs Global Limited generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FBGL/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FBGL/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/FBGL/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

For context: the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry grew revenue 9.7% year over year, combined, vs 84.3% for Fbs Global Limited. Fbs Global Limited's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.02%, a gain of 0.01 percentage points.

Fbs Global Limited's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Fbs Global Limited No Yes Yes No
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 63% 63% 50% 33%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 50.00 % (4 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q4 2025

100%market share
  • Fbs Global Limited100.0%
  • Competitors combined0.0%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Fbs Global Limited and its 0 tracked competitors.

See Fbs Global Limited's full market share breakdown »

FBGL Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

FBGL Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Fbs Global Limited's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
44.4%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar-Size
(4 of 9)
50%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(4 of 8)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Fbs Global Limited 454.10 % Outperformed
Competitors combined (0) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (9) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Fbs Global Limited's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

FBGL Stock Performance relative to Similar-Size Competitors

FBGL Similar-Size Competitors (equal-weighted, 10) Percent change over the selected range

FBGL Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

FBGL Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

Fbs Global Limited's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

The construction industry in Singapore, encompassing interior build-out, fitting-out works, and main contractor services, is characterized by high competition and fragmentation. The Group has established experience in interior fitting-out works, particularly in hospital construction projects within Singapore, as well as in main construction projects. There is no directly comparable industry peer with an identical project profile. The Group identifies Dong Jian (Singapore) Pte Ltd, Top Plasterceil Pte Ltd, and Lincotrade & Associates Pte Ltd as its primary competitors in interior fitting-out works. None of the Group's directors, substantial shareholders, or their associates hold interests in these competitors. Published market share statistics for interior fitting-out works in Singapore are unavailable. Similarly, the main construction works sector is competitive and fragmented, with no meaningful market share comparisons due to the project-based nature of the work.

Fbs Global Limited's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Lincotrade & Associates Pte Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Top Plasterceil Pte Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Dong Jian (Singapore) Pte Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Fbs Global Limited's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.