Electromedical Technologies Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Electromedical Technologies Inc (EMED) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Electromedical Technologies Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 1M vs 39,890M combined for tracked competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-303.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-10.4%) for its tracked peer group.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
Electromedical Technologies Inc vs. its Competitors, Q3 2024
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Electromedical Technologies Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (4) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Electromedical Technologies Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | No | No | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (15) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (1) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 0.00 % (0 of 7) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 25.00 % (2 of 8) | 57.10 % (4 of 7) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
EMED Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
EMED Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
EMED Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Electrocore Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Brainsway Ltd | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Neuropace Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Clearpoint Neuro Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Electromedical Technologies Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Electromedical Technologies Inc
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | 0.07 | 0.58 |
| Medtronic Plc | 115,016.45 | 37,542.00 |
| Axonics Inc | 3,626.23 | 430.95 |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | 2,025.86 | 899.23 |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 526.20 | 350.32 |
| Neuropace Inc | 482.58 | 98.62 |
| SUBTOTAL | 122,755.39 | 39,932.40 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Electromedical Technologies Inc .
Sources: Electromedical Technologies Inc's official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Electromedical Technologies Inc versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic | Named by the company | 85% |
| Galvani Bioelectronics | Named by the company | 85% |
| IcyHot | Named by the company | 85% |
| DJOGlobal-Chatanooga | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Electromedical Technologies Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Medtronic Plc | CARDIOVASCULAR 38.34 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | 0 | - | - |
| Medtronic Plc | 115,016 | 395,179 | 55,463 |
| Axonics Inc | 3,626 | 1,326,009 | -17,415 |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | 2,026 | 674,589 | 101,307 |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 526 | 322,577 | 22,896 |
| Neuropace Inc | 483 | 471,866 | -91,455 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 122,755 | 400,516 | 50,486 |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Medtronic Plc | United States 49.83 % |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | United States 95.93 % |
| Neuropace Inc | Non-US 3.17 % |
| Nevro Corp | United States 86.64 % |
| Sensus Healthcare Inc | US 78.17 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 222 companies in Electromedical Technologies Inc's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Electromedical Technologies Inc ranks #0 of 222 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 587, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (U.S. antitrust guidance: below 1,500 unconcentrated, 1,500 to 2,500 moderately concentrated, above 2,500 highly concentrated).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 145,832 | 13.38 % |
| 2 | Medtronic Plc | 113,372 | 10.40 % |
| 3 | Stryker Corp | 105,405 | 9.67 % |
| 4 | 3m Company | 88,542 | 8.12 % |
| 5 | Boston Scientific Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Becton Dickinson And Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Dexcom Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Resmed Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Alcon inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Electromedical Technologies Inc | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Electromedical Technologies Inc's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-09-25.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (288 companies).| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 118.67 % | 53.35 % (avg) | +65.3 pp |
| Operating Margin | -331.71 % | industry median | -321.4 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -127.28 % | -6.82 % (avg) | -120.5 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.00 % | 5.43 % (avg) | -5.4 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (288 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 34.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 19.7x | - |
| P/B | -0.1x | 4.7x | -4.9x |
| Return on Equity | 48.07 % | industry aggregate | 38.64 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 28.77 % | -2.32 % (avg) | 31.09 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Electromedical Technologies Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Electromedical Technologies Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 587 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.00 % vs industry average 5.43 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Electromedical Technologies Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Electromedical Technologies Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Electromedical Technologies Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Return on equity 38.6 points above the industry aggregate.
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 321.4 points below the industry median.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is decelerating (-303.1% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-10.4% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | 0.02 | 0.10 | - |
| Medtronic Plc | 0.15 | 2.10 | 0.57 |
| Axonics Inc | 3.45 | 9.32 | - |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | 1.21 | 6.38 | - |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 1.91 | 4.00 | - |
| Neuropace Inc | 1.53 | 5.11 | 3.69 |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | Q3 2024 | - | - |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | +41.3 % |
| Axonics Inc | Q3 2024 | +25.6 % | - |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | Q2 2026 | -7.3 % | - |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +8.8 % | +142.0 % |
| Neuropace Inc | Q2 2026 | -1.3 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +13.0 % | +26.5 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | Q3 2024 | +351.2 % | - |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.8 % | -0.2 % |
| Axonics Inc | Q3 2024 | +13.0 % | +178.0 % |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | Q2 2026 | -14.3 % | +1.8 % |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | Q2 2026 | +1.7 % | +232.2 % |
| Neuropace Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.2 % | -25.6 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | - | - | - |
| Medtronic Plc | 5.71% | 6.46% | 10.64% |
| Axonics Inc | - | - | - |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | 15.21% | 16.34% | 17.62% |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 9.17% | 10.02% | 11.49% |
| Neuropace Inc | - | - | - |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Electromedical Technologies Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Electromedical Technologies Inc | - | 0.12 |
| Medtronic Plc | 263.24 | 3.06 |
| Axonics Inc | - | 8.41 |
| Inspire Medical Systems inc | 15.45 | 2.25 |
| Tactile Systems Technology Inc | 21.13 | 1.50 |
| Neuropace Inc | - | 4.89 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 24.40 | 3.07 |
Sign in to see all peers for Electromedical Technologies Inc .
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.