Energy Co Of Parana's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Energy Co Of Parana (ELPC) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Energy Co Of Parana vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 4,962M vs -M combined for tracked competitors (100.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+300.0% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
- Peer revenue share: Energy Co Of Parana accounted for 100.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, up from 100.0% a year earlier.
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
ELPC Sales vs. its Competitors, Q4 2025
Energy Co Of Parana generated 100.00 % of the combined sales of its peer group, up from 100.00 % a year earlier.
For context: the Electric Utilities industry grew revenue 1,579.5% year over year, combined, vs 15.3% for Energy Co Of Parana. Energy Co Of Parana's share of combined industry revenue moved from 1.42% to 0.10%, a loss of 1.32 percentage points.
Energy Co Of Parana's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Co Of Parana | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 50.00 % (4 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 75.00 % (6 of 8) | 50.00 % (3 of 6) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.