Dynatronics's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Dynatronics (DYNT) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Dynatronics vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 27M vs 67,216M combined for its competitors (0.0% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-5.7%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Dynatronics generated -7.6% revenue growth year over year in Q1 2025, vs 8.0% for its competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its -5.5% net margin compares with 14.1% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Dynatronics accounted for 0.0% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.1% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.30M compares with $0.42M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
DYNT Sales vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Dynatronics reported revenue contraction of 7.61 % year on year in Q1 2025, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 8.02 %.
With a net margin of -5.49 %, Dynatronics reported lower profitability than its competitors (14.08 %).
Dynatronics generated 0.04 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.05 % a year earlier.
API endpoints for this dataset
Dynatronics vs. its Competitors, Q1 2025
Revenue growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in Dynatronics reports; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Dynatronics and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (2) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Dynatronics's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry grew revenue 14.4% year over year, combined, vs -7.6% for Dynatronics. Dynatronics's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.01% to 0.01%, a gain of 0.00 percentage points.
Dynatronics's Competitor Quality Breadth
Group definitions: see Methodology: Performance Group Definitions.
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | No | No | No | No |
| Competitors combined (6) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 37.50 % (3 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
DYNT Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
DYNT Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Axogen inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Conmed Corporation | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Medtronic Plc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | Stryker Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Dynatronics's best-performing competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Dynatronics's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
Publicly Traded Peers of Dynatronics Corporation
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
 Dynatronics Corporation |
0.53 | 26.81 |
 Medtronic Plc |
131,664.92 | 37,542.00 |
 Stryker Corp |
126,304.70 | 26,300.00 |
 Axogen inc |
3,137.82 | 266.93 |
 Conmed Corporation |
1,568.01 | 1,369.29 |
 Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp |
1,074.93 | 1,656.79 |
| SUBTOTAL | 263,800.27 | 67,242.35 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Dynatronics Corporation.
Sources: see Methodology: Peer & Competitor Identification, Sourcing.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Dynatronics Corporation versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Dynatronics's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Medtronic Plc | CARDIOVASCULAR 38.34 % |
| Stryker Corp | MedSurg and Neurotechnology 56.20 % |
| Conmed Corporation | Single Reportable 100.00 % |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | Specialty Surgery 73.96 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Dynatronics's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | 1 | 304,715 | -128,340 |
| Medtronic Plc | 131,665 | 395,179 | 55,463 |
| Stryker Corp | 126,305 | 469,643 | 64,696 |
| Axogen inc | 3,138 | 429,141 | -51,322 |
| Conmed Corporation | 1,568 | 351,099 | 18,829 |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | 1,075 | 374,246 | 2,939 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 263,800 | 419,659 | 55,600 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
Dynatronics's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent report. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Medtronic Plc | United States 49.83 % |
| Stryker Corp | United States 75.92 % |
| Axogen inc | United States 98.97 % |
| Conmed Corporation | United States 51.47 % |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | United States 72.80 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's reports (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Dynatronics's Position in Industry Market Structure
Market-capitalization share and concentration across all 218 companies in Dynatronics's industry classification, broader than the peer set above. Market cap in millions of $.Dynatronics ranks #0 of 218 companies by market capitalization in its industry, holding 0.00 % of total industry market cap. The industry's Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) is 615, indicating a unconcentrated market structure (see Methodology: Market Structure & Concentration).
| Rank | Company | Market Cap | Industry Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 163,695 | 13.56 % |
| 2 | Medtronic Plc | 131,665 | 10.91 % |
| 3 | Stryker Corp | 126,732 | 10.50 % |
| 4 | 3m Company | 97,260 | 8.06 % |
| 5 | Boston Scientific Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 6 | Edwards Lifesciences Corporation | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 7 | Becton Dickinson And Company | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 8 | Alcon inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 9 | Medline Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 10 | Resmed Inc | 1,234 | 5.2% |
| 0 | Dynatronics Corporation | 0 | 0.00 % |
Market cap and industry share for the rest of Dynatronics's industry peers requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation) across CSIMarket's industry classification, market capitalization as of 2026-01-12.
Dynatronics's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (342 companies). See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 21.49 % | 46.19 % (avg) | -24.7 pp |
| Operating Margin | -8.74 % | industry median | -6.2 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | -35.54 % | -6.71 % (avg) | -28.8 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 0.11 % | 7.15 % (avg) | -7.0 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Dynatronics's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Medical Equipment & Supplies industry average (342 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Medical Equipment & Supplies industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | - | 36.6x | - |
| EV / EBITDA | - | 17.8x | - |
| P/B | 0.1x | 4.6x | -4.5x |
| Return on Equity | -144.02 % | industry aggregate | -151.89 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -11.95 % | -6.79 % (avg) | -5.16 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Dynatronics's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in company reports.| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 53.51 % | 32.72 % | -6.66 % | -25.50 % | 1.32 % | -4.48 % | -23.28 % | -12.21 % |
| Operating Margin | -1.94 % | -2.52 % | -0.90 % | -8.99 % | -10.00 % | -9.44 % | -13.21 % | -6.09 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | -2.87 % | -3.36 % | -1.16 % | -8.49 % | -8.38 % | -8.68 % | -11.75 % | -5.83 % |
| P/E | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Dynatronics's Strategic Group Map
Dynatronics is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC are labeled. See Methodology: Strategic Group Map for how this chart is built.
Dynatronics's trailing-12-month revenue growth of -12.9% and operating margin of -8.7% compares with an average of -11.4% growth and -8.8% margin across its 8 closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC -- Dynatronics sits below that peer average on growth and above it on margin.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Dynatronics's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Competitive Rivalry | High | Industry HHI of 615 (see Industry Market Structure & Concentration above) |
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 0.11 % vs industry average 7.15 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
Note: see Methodology: Porter's Five Forces. Supplier power and buyer power are covered on Dynatronics's dedicated Suppliers and Customers pages, not here.
Dynatronics's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
See Methodology: GE/McKinsey Matrix for how the two axes are built.
Dynatronics falls in the Low attractiveness / Low strength cell: Harvest / Divest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Dynatronics's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+4.8% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Operating margin 6.2 points below the industry median.
- Return on equity 151.9 points below the industry aggregate.
- Underperforming the U.S.A. 500 over the trailing 12 months.
Opportunities
No rule matched.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-5.7% annualized).
Methodology: see Methodology: SWOT Analysis.
Dynatronics's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | 0.06 | 1.13 | 0.28 |
| Medtronic Plc | 0.15 | 2.10 | 0.57 |
| Stryker Corp | 0.50 | 2.08 | 0.65 |
| Axogen inc | 4.65 | 8.11 | 0.04 |
| Conmed Corporation | - | 1.77 | 1.20 |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | 0.64 | 3.22 | 2.02 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dynatronics's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | Q3 2025 | -7.6 % | - |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.7 % | +41.3 % |
| Stryker Corp | Q3 2026 | +7.6 % | -12.3 % |
| Axogen inc | Q3 2026 | +26.2 % | +229.7 % |
| Conmed Corporation | Q3 2026 | -0.7 % | +592.4 % |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | Q3 2026 | +2.3 % | - |
| PEERS TOTAL | +10.8 % | +19.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Dynatronics's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | Q3 2025 | -5.9 % | - |
| Medtronic Plc | Q2 2026 | +13.8 % | -0.2 % |
| Stryker Corp | Q3 2026 | +3.0 % | +26.7 % |
| Axogen inc | Q3 2026 | +35.6 % | -10.7 % |
| Conmed Corporation | Q3 2026 | -14.8 % | -48.3 % |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | Q3 2026 | +3.2 % | -32.4 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
Dynatronics's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | - | - | - |
| Medtronic Plc | 5.71% | 6.46% | 10.64% |
| Stryker Corp | 7.66% | 8.63% | 15.61% |
| Axogen inc | - | - | - |
| Conmed Corporation | 3.18% | 3.16% | 7.07% |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | 0.37% | 0.31% | 1.24% |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Dynatronics's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Dynatronics Corporation | - | 0.02 |
| Medtronic Plc | 301.34 | 3.51 |
| Stryker Corp | 34.96 | 4.80 |
| Axogen inc | - | 11.76 |
| Conmed Corporation | 21.51 | 1.15 |
| Integra Lifesciences Holdings Corp | 81.48 | 0.65 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 29.66 | 3.92 |
Sign in to see all peers for Dynatronics Corporation.
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.