Competition & Peer Data API & CSV Delivery Connect to AI Assistant via MCP

Citrix Systems Inc's Competitiveness

A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Citrix Systems Inc (CTXS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.

Peer Data As of Q2 2022
Competitors Tracked
43
Publicly traded peers
Peer Group Market Share
0.34 %
vs 0.36 % a year ago
Revenue Growth Y/Y
5.84 %
Peers: 9.87 %
Net Margin
13.43 %
Peers: 7.30 %

Key Findings: Citrix Systems Inc vs Its Competitors

  • TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,314M vs 1,387,136M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
  • Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-28.3%) for its tracked peer group.
  • Growth: Citrix Systems Inc generated 5.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2022, vs 9.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
  • Profitability: Its 13.4% net margin compares with 7.3% for the peer group.
  • Peer revenue share: Citrix Systems Inc accounted for 0.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.4% a year earlier.
  • Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.37M compares with $0.54M for the peer group (0.7x).

Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).

CTXS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022

Citrix Systems Inc reported revenue growth of 5.84 % year on year in Q2 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.87 %.

With a net margin of 13.43 %, Citrix Systems Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (7.30 %).

Citrix Systems Inc generated 0.34 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.36 % a year earlier.

API endpoints for this dataset
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTXS/competitors
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTXS/relationships
https://api.csimarket.com/api/v1/companies/CTXS/similar
Programmatic access for models, analytics, and integration workflows.

Citrix Systems Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022

Revenue growth, year on year

Citrix Systems Inc +5.8 %
Competitors combined +9.9 %

Net income growth, year on year

Citrix Systems Inc +84.0 %
Competitors combined -45.3 %

Net margin

Citrix Systems Inc +13.4 %
Competitors combined +7.3 %

Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months

Citrix Systems Inc +3.7 %
Competitors combined -28.3 %

TTM net margin

Citrix Systems Inc +10.0 %
Competitors combined +21.0 %

TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.

Competitor Financial Benchmarking - TTM Commercial

TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Citrix Systems Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.

Entity TTM Revenue Latest Q ×4 Rev Run-rate vs TTM TTM Net Income TTM Net Margin
Citrix Systems Inc. $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitors combined $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
High-Confidence Competitors (16) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Similar Growth & Profitability (6) $12,345M $12,345M +12.3% · Accelerating $1,234M 12.3%
Competitor Financial Benchmarking

TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Citrix Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.4% year over year, combined, vs 5.8% for Citrix Systems Inc. Citrix Systems Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.29% to 0.27%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.

Citrix Systems Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth

Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).

Entity Profitable Expanding Above Industry Growth Distressed
Citrix Systems Inc. Yes Yes No Yes
Competitors combined (41) 58% 82% 53% 23%
High-Confidence Competitors (18) 67% 94% 61% 12%
Similar Growth & Profitability (8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 100.00 % (8 of 8) 0.00 % (0 of 8) 12.50 % (1 of 8)

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.

Market Share of the Peer Group, Q2 2022

0.3%market share
  • Citrix Systems Inc0.3%
  • Competitors combined99.7%

Share of combined quarterly revenue of Citrix Systems Inc and its 43 tracked competitors.

See Citrix Systems Inc's full market share breakdown »

CTXS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors

CTXS Competitors (weighted) Percent change over the selected range

Citrix Systems Inc's Share Price Performance vs Peer Groups

Trailing 12-month total share price return, and the share of each group that outperformed the U.S.A. 500 over the same period. Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC.
27.3%beat U.S.A. 500
Competitors Combined
(9 of 33)
42.9%beat U.S.A. 500
High-Confidence
(6 of 14)
40%beat U.S.A. 500
Similar Growth & Profitability
(2 of 5)
Entity TTM Share Price Return
(group: median)
vs U.S.A. 500
Citrix Systems Inc. - -
Competitors combined (33) 40.4% 63.2%
High-Confidence Competitors (14) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar-Size Competitors (0) 40.4% 63.2%
Similar Growth & Profitability (5) 40.4% 63.2%
Peer Group Share Price Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Citrix Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API (daily market-structure computation). Outperformance is trailing-12-month total return vs the U.S.A. 500 over the same window, not risk-adjusted.

CTXS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors

CTXS High-Confidence Competitors (equal-weighted, 19) Percent change over the selected range

CTXS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors

CTXS Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors (equal-weighted, 8) Percent change over the selected range

5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months

#CompetitorTTM Share Price Returnvs U.S.A. 500
1 Fastly Inc 282.9% Outperformed
2 Zeta Global Holdings Corp 282.9% Outperformed
3 A10 Networks Inc 282.9% Outperformed
4 Upland Software Inc 282.9% Outperformed
5 Akamai Technologies Inc 282.9% Outperformed
Best-Performing Competitor Returns

TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Citrix Systems Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.

Citrix Systems Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers

We sell our products in intensely competitive markets. Some of our competitors and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, sales and marketing and other resources than we do. As the markets for our products and services continue to develop, additional companies, including those with significant market presence in the computer appliances, software and networking industries, could enter the markets in which we compete and further intensify competition. In addition, we believe price competition could become a more significant competitive factor in the future. As a result, we may not be able to maintain our historic prices and margins, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Mobile and Desktop
Our Desktop and Application Virtualization products are based on an alternative technology platform the success of which will depend on organizations and customers perceiving technological and operational benefits and cost savings associated with adopting desktop and application virtualization solutions. Our primary competition in this market is the existing IT desktop management practice of manually configuring physical desktops, which is time-consuming, expensive and subject to inconsistency. We also face numerous competitors that provide automation of these processes and alternative approaches, including VMwares Horizon View product and Oracle Corporation, or Oracles, broad virtualization stack which is a feature of its operating system and management software. We believe XenDesktop and XenApp give Citrix a competitive advantage by providing customers multiple ways to virtualize and deliver desktops and or apps with one, integrated virtualization system and delivering a higher performance user experience.

Our Enterprise Mobility Management product line, XenMobile, competes with VMware, MobileIron, Good Technology and other smaller competitors. We believe we differentiate ourselves from these competitors by providing the most complete solution on the market, with MDM, MAM and core mobile applications, including secure mobile email, calendar and browser.

We also see competition from competitors that are combining mobile and desktop technologies. VMware is an example with their Horizon Suite, positioned as a platform for workforce mobility. We believe the Citrix solution, enabled by the Xen suite of products, is the best solution available today that can securely deliver a mobile workspace - all Windows, Web, SaaS and native mobile applications, data and virtual desktops - to any device, anywhere. Further, we believe that our end-user experience has a competitive edge when compared to the alternative solutions due to the intuitiveness and self-service features of our offering.

Networking and Cloud
Our NetScaler products compete against other established competitors, including, F5 Networks, Inc., or F5, and to a lesser extent, A10 Networks. Both compete with us for traditional enterprise sales opportunities, while F5 is our principal competitor in the Internet-centric market segment. We continue to enhance NetScalers feature capability and aggressively market NetScaler to our existing customer base as well as expanding into telco and cloud provider markets.
Our ByteMobile Smart Capacity products primary competition is a network engineering organization that elects not to employ the type of optimization solution we offer. In addition, ByteMobile Smart Capacity competes with single-purpose or limited-purpose vendors that address a portion of what our product offers and may or may not partner with other vendors to complete their offerings. Our ByteMobile Smart Capacity product is a market share leader in the video and web optimization market, with a large installed base of tier-one mobile network operator customers. We believe that ByteMobile Smart Capacity has competitive advantages both in core optimization technology and in its ability to consolidate disparate hardware and software functionality into a single managed network element.

Competition for CloudBridge, comes in the form of alternative approaches to making the cloud a secure extension of a companys on-premise enterprise network, such as WAN optimization, Internet protocol security, or IPSec, or multi-protocol label switching, or MPLS, network solutions, among others. F5 is a key competitor in this space. With regards to WAN optimization, CloudBridge also competes with Cisco and Riverbed Technology, Inc., or Riverbed. Cisco has the largest market share, benefiting from its leadership in the networking market. Riverbed is a less established company than Citrix, but has the advantage of being focused solely on WAN optimization. We believe CloudBridge is a more feature-rich solution than the other alternatives and provides superior flexibility as part of NetScaler.

VMware is also the main competitor for our CloudPlatform product, which is an advanced platform for building highly scalable and reliable cloud computing environments, and our CloudPortal product, which is a comprehensive portal for provisioning hosted applications, desktops, services and IaaS. Unlike VMwares products, our CloudPlatform and CloudPortal products draw on the successful models and experience of large, public cloud implementations and apply them to enterprise, private clouds. The differentiation and experience of our products is expanded when coupled with our NetScaler and XenServer products, both of which are used in large, public cloud implementations. Additionally, OpenStack, an open source project, provides an alternative solution to our CloudPlatform product. We believe CloudPlatform has a competitive advantage, as it is production ready for cloud deployment.
In the server virtualization market, we compete directly with VMware, which was first to market with this technology and is widely regarded as the market leader. In addition, we also compete with Microsofts Windows Server 2012 with Hyper-V. Microsoft first entered this market in 2008 and has since established its position as a leader in this space. To a lesser extent, and mostly only in the niche technology areas of test and development, we compete with RedHat, who recently expanded into this market. We believe XenServer, our server virtualization product, has features that are competitive with VMwares ESX Server in terms of performance, scalability and other enterprise-class capabilities. XenServer is offered as a free download, which significantly increases the reach of server virtualization to customers of all sizes and geographies. We monetize the XenServer product line by selling maintenance and updates, which aligns with our CloudPlatform go-to-market strategy.

Collaboration and Data
Our products for collaboration continue to maintain solid leadership positions in extremely competitive markets, particularly among, SMBs. We differentiate our SaaS offerings by designing simple, secure, reliable and cost-efficient products that deliver a superior customer experience. Our competitors range from large, established technology firms to small,

Internet-based startups.
In Collaboration, we compete primarily with Cisco WebEx, Microsoft Lync and Skype, and conferencing call solutions from Intercall, PGi, AT&T and Verizon. Additionally we compete with freemium products such as Logmeins Join.me and

Googles Google + Hangouts. Our GoToMeeting, GoToWebinar and GoToTraining products have proven to be competitive based on ease-of-use and the All You Can Meet® pricing model, combined with built-in VoIP and toll-based PSTN audio services. We further differentiate our collaboration products by integrating OpenVoice toll-free seamlessly with the built-in VoIP and toll audio services and having purpose-built solutions for marketing and training use cases. We believe these features give us competitive advantage among individual, prosumer and SMB customers.

We have been a market leader with our GoToMyPC product for many years. Our direct competition includes LogMeIn, Inc., or LogMeIn, free solutions such as Microsofts Live Mesh and those from many Internet startups. In addition, new remote access features in desktop operating systems like Microsoft Windows and Macintosh OSX provide alternatives to our solution. We endeavor to differentiate our products by continuing our focus on security, ease-of-use and support for multiple desktop operating systems.
Our GoToAssist product has achieved a large market share for Web-based clientless remote support. This product includes a version purpose-built for individual users, consultants and small businesses, positioning Citrix as the only provider of remote support solutions for all segments of the market. In remote support, we compete with Ciscos WebEx and LogMeIn.
In the data sharing market, ShareFiles direct competition includes Dropbox, Inc., Box, Inc. and HighTail, Inc. (formerly YouSendIt), as well as legacy solutions like traditional file transfer protocol, or FTP, in the SMB market. Many of these competitors have strong brand recognition through their consumer and free versions of their products. However, we believe ShareFile offers a superior solution as it is built specifically for the needs of businesses. In the Enterprise segment, there are fewer direct competitors to the ShareFile product. Increased competition is anticipated as large enterprises need to deploy secure data syncing and sharing solutions for a growing mobile workforce. We believe that Citrixs strong reputation in the Enterprise market, along with ShareFiles integration into Citrix products such as Receiver and XenMobile, and our unique ability to store data on-premise or in the Cloud, will be a key differentiator.

Publicly Traded Peers of Citrix Systems Inc.

Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees
Company Market Cap Revenues Income Employees
Citrix Systems Inc. 13,281.74 3,314.15 330.37 9,000
Microsoft Corporation 3,821,898.40 331,839.00 133,749.00 223,000
Amazon com Inc 2,706,451.69 776,231.00 135,281.00 1,576,000
Oracle Corporation 414,210.00 73,266.00 18,920.00 141,000
Sap Se 247,678.25 41,606.87 8,282.93 110,000
International Business Machines Corporation 215,075.32 69,096.00 10,725.00 305,300
SUBTOTAL 7,978,808.73 1,391,664.87 291,089.22 2,567,285
38 more competitors available

Sign in to see all competitors of Citrix Systems Inc..

Sources: Citrix Systems Inc.'s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Citrix Systems Inc. versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.

Citrix Systems Inc's Competitors Named by the Company

Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.
Competitor Basis Confidence Active Sources
Monday.com Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Amazon Web Services Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Ivanti Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Okta Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Hopto Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
A10 Networks Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Dropbox Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
F5 Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Asana Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Microsoft Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Smartsheet Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Box Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Adobe Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Google Cloud Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Nutanix Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Fastly Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Digital Turbine Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Atlassian Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
MobileIron Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
VMware Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Cornerstone Ondemand Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Upland Software Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Oracle Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
International Business Machines Corporation Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Servicenow Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Walkme Ltd Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Box Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Akamai Technologies Inc Named by the company 85% 2022 to 2026 3
Competitor Evidence Detail

Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Citrix Systems Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.

Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.

Citrix Systems Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers

Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).
Company Largest Segment 2nd Segment 3rd Segment
Microsoft Corporation Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % Intelligent Cloud 41.52 % More Personal Computing 16.29 %
Amazon com Inc North America 57.75 % Amazon Web Services 20.99 % International 20.98 %
Oracle Corporation Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % Services Business 8.06 % Hardware Business 3.99 %
International Business Machines Corporation Software 45.22 % Consulting 31.04 % Infrastructure 22.35 %
Strategy Inc Software Business 100.00 % - -

Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).

4 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Citrix Systems Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison

Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $
CompanyMarket CapRevenue / EmployeeIncome / Employee
Citrix Systems Inc. 13,282 368,239 36,708
Microsoft Corporation 3,821,898 1,488,067 599,771
Amazon com Inc 2,706,452 492,532 85,838
Oracle Corporation 414,210 519,617 134,184
Sap Se 247,678 378,244 75,299
International Business Machines Corporation 215,075 226,322 35,129
PEERS TOTAL 7,965,527 542,688 113,654
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Citrix Systems Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers

Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.
Company Largest Market 2nd Market 3rd Market
Citrix Systems Inc. Americas 57.31 % EMEA 33.22 % APJ 9.47 %
Microsoft Corporation US 51.47 % Non Us 48.53 % -
Oracle Corporation Americas 63.46 % EMEA 22.14 % Asia Pacific 10.42 %
International Business Machines Corporation Americas 49.04 % EMEA 32.82 % Asia Pacific 18.13 %
Salesforce Inc Americas 64.97 % Europe 24.74 % Asia Pacific 10.29 %
Servicenow Inc North America 63.26 % EMEA 25.01 % Asia Pacific and other 11.74 %

Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.

25 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Citrix Systems Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure

Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (347 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Difference
Gross Margin 81.35 % 63.86 % (avg) +17.5 pp
Operating Margin 9.93 % industry median +33.0 pp
EBITDA Margin 23.34 % 2.77 % (avg) +20.6 pp
Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) 2.55 % 4.77 % (avg) -2.2 pp

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.

Citrix Systems Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position

Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (347 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.
Metric Company Industry Average Difference
P/E 38.4x 39.4x -1.1x
EV / EBITDA 19.9x 21.7x -1.8x
P/B 20.9x 5.4x +15.5x
Return on Equity 54.25 % industry aggregate 35.56 %
Return on Invested Capital 6.11 % -0.30 % (avg) 6.41 %

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.

Citrix Systems Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory

Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.
Metric 20142015201620172018201920202021
Revenue Growth 7.69 %4.22 %4.36 %-17.36 %5.28 %1.23 %7.51 %-0.60 %
Operating Margin 9.62 %10.69 %18.99 %20.21 %22.80 %17.81 %18.81 %7.35 %
Return on Invested Capital 5.09 %5.87 %12.94 %10.22 %20.66 %17.32 %21.94 %4.59 %
P/E 42.6x37.1x26.1x-26.8x22.4x31.8x37.6x

Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.

Citrix Systems Inc's Strategic Group Map

Every company in Citrix Systems Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Citrix Systems Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.

Revenue Growth (TTM, %)Operating Margin (%)MOMOAKAMCISNCitrix Systems IncEGANMIXTECOMVTEXTDC

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.

Citrix Systems Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)

Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.
Force Assessment Basis
Barriers to Entry Lower than typical for the industry Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.55 % vs industry average 4.77 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above)
Supplier Power Not covered on this page See Citrix Systems Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data
Buyer Power Not covered on this page See Citrix Systems Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data
Threat of Substitutes - No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated

Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.

Citrix Systems Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength

A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.

High Strength
Medium Strength
Low Strength
High Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Invest / Grow
Selective
Medium Attractiveness
Invest / Grow
Selective
Harvest
Low Attractiveness
Selective
Harvest Citrix Systems Inc
Harvest / Divest

Citrix Systems Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.

Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.

Citrix Systems Inc's SWOT

Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.

Strengths

  • Operating margin 33.0 points above the industry median.
  • Return on equity 35.6 points above the industry aggregate.
  • Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).

Weaknesses

  • Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.

Opportunities

  • Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.2% median pace.
  • Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (38.4x vs 39.4x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.

Threats

  • Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-28.3% annualized).

Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.

Citrix Systems Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison

Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months
CompanyQuick RatioWorking CapitalDebt / EquityAsset Turnover
Citrix Systems Inc. 0.28 0.74 5.46 0.48
Microsoft Corporation 0.13 1.31 0.11 0.49
Amazon com Inc 0.38 1.07 0.21 0.87
Oracle Corporation 0.72 1.12 2.83 0.30
Sap Se 0.47 1.16 0.10 0.50
International Business Machines Corporation 0.29 0.87 3.47 0.46
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Citrix Systems Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers

Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodRevenue Y/YRevenue Q/QIncome Y/YIncome Q/Q
Citrix Systems Inc.Q2 2022+5.8 %+4.1 %+83.9 %+91.7 %
Microsoft CorporationQ2 2026+17.7 %+8.6 %+31.3 %+12.5 %
Amazon com Inc Q2 2026+19.9 %+10.8 %+244.9 %+107.1 %
Oracle CorporationQ3 2026+24.0 %+0.8 %+62.6 %+10.6 %
Sap SeQ4 2025+12.5 %+12.5 %+143.0 %+143.0 %
International Business Machines CorporationQ2 2026+1.1 %+7.8 %-1.3 %+78.0 %
PEERS TOTAL+17.4 %+9.2 %+65.2 %+77.9 %
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.

Citrix Systems Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures

Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter
CompanyPeriodCosts Y/YCosts Q/QCapex Y/YCapex Q/Q
Citrix Systems Inc.Q2 2022-3.3 %+9.9 %-28.5 %-22.4 %
Microsoft CorporationQ2 2026+22.9 %+10.1 %+109.6 %+129.6 %
Amazon com Inc Q2 2026+18.5 %+9.5 %+300.3 %+191.4 %
Oracle CorporationQ3 2026--+235.2 %+72.8 %
Sap SeQ4 2025+9.6 %+9.6 %--
International Business Machines CorporationQ2 2026+3.6 %+4.1 %+9.0 %-1.3 %
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

Citrix Systems Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers

ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover
CompanyROAROIROEReceivables TurnoverInventory Turnover
Citrix Systems Inc.4.82%6.92%54.25%4.8824.85
Microsoft Corporation19.76%22.48%34.22%5.0390.84
Amazon com Inc 15.21%23.40%30.50%10.619.88
Oracle Corporation7.73%9.84%44.45%7.145.96
Sap Se10.03%12.84%15.66%5.31-
International Business Machines Corporation7.07%7.03%33.43%10.5619.83
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).

Citrix Systems Inc's Valuation vs Peers

P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book
CompanyP/EPrice / SalesPEGP/CFPrice / Book
Citrix Systems Inc.40.084.01-36.4416.11
Microsoft Corporation28.5711.520.74-8.64
Amazon com Inc 19.953.490.1956.244.91
Oracle Corporation21.645.650.4314.546.16
Sap Se34.595.950.1923.014.68
International Business Machines Corporation19.983.110.21-6.23
PEERS AVERAGE27.415.73109.916.37
38 more Peers available

Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..

P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.

Get the full CSIMarket dataset: Subscribe API License