Citrix Systems Inc's Competitiveness
A competitive positioning analysis and financial ratio benchmarking of Citrix Systems Inc (CTXS) against its publicly traded competitors: sales growth, net income, profitability, valuation and market share, plus each peer's market capitalization, revenue, income and employees. Free below: the top 5 peers. Subscriber access adds the full competitor list and CSV downloads.
Key Findings: Citrix Systems Inc vs Its Competitors
- TTM: Trailing 12-month revenue of 3,314M vs 1,387,136M combined for tracked competitors (0.2% combined share).
- Trending: Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months), vs decelerating (-28.3%) for its tracked peer group.
- Growth: Citrix Systems Inc generated 5.8% revenue growth year over year in Q2 2022, vs 9.9% for its tracked competitors combined.
- Profitability: Its 13.4% net margin compares with 7.3% for the peer group.
- Peer revenue share: Citrix Systems Inc accounted for 0.3% of combined revenue among its tracked peer group, down from 0.4% a year earlier.
- Peer differentiation: Revenue per employee of $0.37M compares with $0.54M for the peer group (0.7x).
Every figure above is sourced and cited in detail further down this page (Market Structure, Profitability & Cost Structure, Productivity vs Peers).
CTXS Sales vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Citrix Systems Inc reported revenue growth of 5.84 % year on year in Q2 2022, below its competitors' combined revenue growth of 9.87 %.
With a net margin of 13.43 %, Citrix Systems Inc achieved higher profitability than its competitors (7.30 %).
Citrix Systems Inc generated 0.34 % of the combined sales of its peer group, down from 0.36 % a year earlier.
Citrix Systems Inc vs. its Competitors, Q2 2022
Revenue growth, year on year
Net income growth, year on year
Net margin
Revenue run-rate vs trailing 12 months
TTM net margin
TTM = trailing twelve months. Run-rate annualizes the latest quarter (×4) and compares it to TTM. In millions of $. High-Confidence Competitors are named as a competitor directly in an SEC filing; Similar-Size Competitors are the closest peers by market-cap rank within the same industry; Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors are the closest peers by combined revenue growth, operating margin and ROIC, all independent of the competitor list.
TTM revenue, latest-quarter run-rate and net income/margin benchmarked across Citrix Systems Inc and its 4 competitor groupings. Available under Commercial License.
| Entity | TTM Revenue | Rev Run-rate vs TTM |
|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Competitors combined | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| High-Confidence Competitors (16) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
| Similar Growth & Profitability (6) | $12,345M | +12.3% · Accelerating |
TTM revenue, run-rate and net margin benchmarking across Citrix Systems Inc's competitor groups requires a Commercial License.
For context: the Software & Programming industry grew revenue 16.4% year over year, combined, vs 5.8% for Citrix Systems Inc. Citrix Systems Inc's share of combined industry revenue moved from 0.29% to 0.27%, a loss of 0.03 percentage points.
Citrix Systems Inc's Competitor Quality Breadth
Share of each group, trailing 12 months: profitable (net margin > 0), expanding (revenue growth > 0), growing faster than the industry's own median, and financially distressed (Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below).
| Entity | Profitable | Expanding | Above Industry Growth | Distressed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Competitors combined (41) | ||||
| High-Confidence Competitors (18) | ||||
| Similar Growth & Profitability (8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 100.00 % (8 of 8) | 0.00 % (0 of 8) | 12.50 % (1 of 8) |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Altman Z-Score is not shown here: it is not populated in the underlying data for any company. Percentages are of companies in each group that report the relevant metric, not of the full group size.
CTXS Stock Performance relative to its Competitors
CTXS Stock Performance relative to High-Confidence Competitors
CTXS Stock Performance relative to Similar Growth & Profitability Competitors
5 Best-Performing Tracked Competitors, Trailing 12 Months
| # | Competitor | TTM Share Price Return | vs U.S.A. 500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fastly Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 2 | A10 Networks Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 3 | Akamai Technologies Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 4 | Zeta Global Holdings Corp | 282.9% | Outperformed |
| 5 | F5 Inc | 282.9% | Outperformed |
TTM share price return and U.S.A. 500 outperformance for Citrix Systems Inc's best-performing tracked competitors requires a Commercial License.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months.
Citrix Systems Inc's Comment on Competition and Industry Peers
We sell our products in intensely competitive markets. Some of our competitors
and potential competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, sales
and marketing and other resources than we do. As the markets for our products
and services continue to develop, additional companies, including those with
significant market presence in the computer appliances, software and networking
industries, could enter the markets in which we compete and further intensify
competition. In addition, we believe price competition could become a more significant
competitive factor in the future. As a result, we may not be able to maintain
our historic prices and margins, which could adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition.
Mobile and Desktop
Our Desktop and Application Virtualization products are based on an alternative
technology platform the success of which will depend on organizations and customers
perceiving technological and operational benefits and cost savings associated
with adopting desktop and application virtualization solutions. Our primary
competition in this market is the existing IT desktop management practice of
manually configuring physical desktops, which is time-consuming, expensive and
subject to inconsistency. We also face numerous competitors that provide automation
of these processes and alternative approaches, including VMwares Horizon View
product and Oracle Corporation, or Oracles, broad virtualization stack which
is a feature of its operating system and management software. We believe XenDesktop
and XenApp give Citrix a competitive advantage by providing customers multiple
ways to virtualize and deliver desktops and or apps with one, integrated virtualization
system and delivering a higher performance user experience.
Our Enterprise Mobility Management product line, XenMobile, competes with VMware,
MobileIron, Good Technology and other smaller competitors. We believe we differentiate
ourselves from these competitors by providing the most complete solution on
the market, with MDM, MAM and core mobile applications, including secure mobile
email, calendar and browser.
We also see competition from competitors that are combining mobile and desktop
technologies. VMware is an example with their Horizon Suite, positioned as a
platform for workforce mobility. We believe the Citrix solution, enabled by
the Xen suite of products, is the best solution available today that can securely
deliver a mobile workspace - all Windows, Web, SaaS and native mobile applications,
data and virtual desktops - to any device, anywhere. Further, we believe that
our end-user experience has a competitive edge when compared to the alternative
solutions due to the intuitiveness and self-service features of our offering.
Networking and Cloud
Our NetScaler products compete against other established competitors, including,
F5 Networks, Inc., or F5, and to a lesser extent, A10 Networks. Both compete
with us for traditional enterprise sales opportunities, while F5 is our principal
competitor in the Internet-centric market segment. We continue to enhance NetScalers
feature capability and aggressively market NetScaler to our existing customer
base as well as expanding into telco and cloud provider markets.
Our ByteMobile Smart Capacity products primary competition is a network engineering
organization that elects not to employ the type of optimization solution we
offer. In addition, ByteMobile Smart Capacity competes with single-purpose or
limited-purpose vendors that address a portion of what our product offers and
may or may not partner with other vendors to complete their offerings. Our ByteMobile
Smart Capacity product is a market share leader in the video and web optimization
market, with a large installed base of tier-one mobile network operator customers.
We believe that ByteMobile Smart Capacity has competitive advantages both in
core optimization technology and in its ability to consolidate disparate hardware
and software functionality into a single managed network element.
Competition for CloudBridge, comes in the form of alternative approaches to
making the cloud a secure extension of a companys on-premise enterprise network,
such as WAN optimization, Internet protocol security, or IPSec, or multi-protocol
label switching, or MPLS, network solutions, among others. F5 is a key competitor
in this space. With regards to WAN optimization, CloudBridge also competes with
Cisco and Riverbed Technology, Inc., or Riverbed. Cisco has the largest market
share, benefiting from its leadership in the networking market. Riverbed is
a less established company than Citrix, but has the advantage of being focused
solely on WAN optimization. We believe CloudBridge is a more feature-rich solution
than the other alternatives and provides superior flexibility as part of NetScaler.
VMware is also the main competitor for our CloudPlatform product, which is
an advanced platform for building highly scalable and reliable cloud computing
environments, and our CloudPortal product, which is a comprehensive portal for
provisioning hosted applications, desktops, services and IaaS. Unlike VMwares
products, our CloudPlatform and CloudPortal products draw on the successful
models and experience of large, public cloud implementations and apply them
to enterprise, private clouds. The differentiation and experience of our products
is expanded when coupled with our NetScaler and XenServer products, both of
which are used in large, public cloud implementations. Additionally, OpenStack,
an open source project, provides an alternative solution to our CloudPlatform
product. We believe CloudPlatform has a competitive advantage, as it is production
ready for cloud deployment.
In the server virtualization market, we compete directly with VMware, which
was first to market with this technology and is widely regarded as the market
leader. In addition, we also compete with Microsofts Windows Server 2012 with
Hyper-V. Microsoft first entered this market in 2008 and has since established
its position as a leader in this space. To a lesser extent, and mostly only
in the niche technology areas of test and development, we compete with RedHat,
who recently expanded into this market. We believe XenServer, our server virtualization
product, has features that are competitive with VMwares ESX Server in terms
of performance, scalability and other enterprise-class capabilities. XenServer
is offered as a free download, which significantly increases the reach of server
virtualization to customers of all sizes and geographies. We monetize the XenServer
product line by selling maintenance and updates, which aligns with our CloudPlatform
go-to-market strategy.
Collaboration and Data
Our products for collaboration continue to maintain solid leadership positions
in extremely competitive markets, particularly among, SMBs. We differentiate
our SaaS offerings by designing simple, secure, reliable and cost-efficient
products that deliver a superior customer experience. Our competitors range
from large, established technology firms to small,
Internet-based startups.
In Collaboration, we compete primarily with Cisco WebEx, Microsoft Lync and
Skype, and conferencing call solutions from Intercall, PGi, AT&T and Verizon.
Additionally we compete with freemium products such as Logmeins Join.me and
Googles Google + Hangouts. Our GoToMeeting, GoToWebinar and GoToTraining products have proven to be competitive based on ease-of-use and the All You Can Meet® pricing model, combined with built-in VoIP and toll-based PSTN audio services. We further differentiate our collaboration products by integrating OpenVoice toll-free seamlessly with the built-in VoIP and toll audio services and having purpose-built solutions for marketing and training use cases. We believe these features give us competitive advantage among individual, prosumer and SMB customers.
We have been a market leader with our GoToMyPC product for many years. Our
direct competition includes LogMeIn, Inc., or LogMeIn, free solutions such as
Microsofts Live Mesh and those from many Internet startups. In addition, new
remote access features in desktop operating systems like Microsoft Windows and
Macintosh OSX provide alternatives to our solution. We endeavor to differentiate
our products by continuing our focus on security, ease-of-use and support for
multiple desktop operating systems.
Our GoToAssist product has achieved a large market share for Web-based clientless
remote support. This product includes a version purpose-built for individual
users, consultants and small businesses, positioning Citrix as the only provider
of remote support solutions for all segments of the market. In remote support,
we compete with Ciscos WebEx and LogMeIn.
In the data sharing market, ShareFiles direct competition includes Dropbox,
Inc., Box, Inc. and HighTail, Inc. (formerly YouSendIt), as well as legacy solutions
like traditional file transfer protocol, or FTP, in the SMB market. Many of
these competitors have strong brand recognition through their consumer and free
versions of their products. However, we believe ShareFile offers a superior
solution as it is built specifically for the needs of businesses. In the Enterprise
segment, there are fewer direct competitors to the ShareFile product. Increased
competition is anticipated as large enterprises need to deploy secure data syncing
and sharing solutions for a growing mobile workforce. We believe that Citrixs
strong reputation in the Enterprise market, along with ShareFiles integration
into Citrix products such as Receiver and XenMobile, and our unique ability
to store data on-premise or in the Cloud, will be a key differentiator.
Publicly Traded Peers of Citrix Systems Inc.
Revenue and income for trailing 12 months, in millions of $, except employees| Company | Market Cap | Revenues |
|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | 13,281.74 | 3,314.15 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,870,007.52 | 331,839.00 |
| Amazon com Inc | 2,725,586.46 | 776,231.00 |
| Oracle Corporation | 414,645.00 | 73,266.00 |
| Sap Se | 249,675.87 | 41,606.87 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 220,818.73 | 69,096.00 |
| SUBTOTAL | 8,056,251.19 | 1,391,664.87 |
Sign in to see all competitors of Citrix Systems Inc..
Sources: Citrix Systems Inc.'s official press releases and regulatory filings; CSIMarket.com's market research; and the financial filings and press releases of the other companies cited.
Updated on:
Focus of this report: publicly traded companies. Ten additional tables on Citrix Systems Inc. versus competitors, including market share analysis, are in the navigation menu under Competition. To download the tables, please subscribe.
Citrix Systems Inc's Competitors Named by the Company
Competitive relationships identified from SEC filings and corroborating sources, each with a basis and confidence.| Competitor | Basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Monday.com | Named by the company | 85% |
| Asana | Named by the company | 85% |
| Microsoft | Named by the company | 85% |
| Smartsheet | Named by the company | 85% |
| Box | Named by the company | 85% |
| Adobe | Named by the company | 85% |
| Google Cloud | Named by the company | 85% |
| Nutanix | Named by the company | 85% |
| Fastly Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Digital Turbine Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Atlassian | Named by the company | 85% |
| MobileIron | Named by the company | 85% |
| VMware | Named by the company | 85% |
| Amazon Web Services | Named by the company | 85% |
| Ivanti | Named by the company | 85% |
| Okta | Named by the company | 85% |
| Hopto Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| A10 Networks Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Dropbox | Named by the company | 85% |
| F5 Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
| Servicenow Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Walkme Ltd | Named by the company | 85% |
| Box Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Akamai Technologies Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Cornerstone Ondemand Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Upland Software Inc | Named by the company | 85% |
| Oracle Corporation | Named by the company | 85% |
Filing basis, confidence, active dates and source counts for Citrix Systems Inc's named competitors require a Commercial License.
Methodology: relationships are extracted from SEC filings (named-competitor disclosures) and corroborating sources. Named by the company = explicitly disclosed as a competitor; Inferred = derived from corroborating signals. Confidence reflects evidence strength.
Citrix Systems Inc's Business Segment Mix vs Peers
Revenue by operating segment or division, as named and reported by each company. Segment names are the filer's own and are not standardized across companies. Do not assume a same-named or similarly-named segment is defined identically between two companies. Shares are of each company's own total revenue and are not required to sum to 100% (intersegment revenue, unallocated items).| Company | Largest Segment |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation | Productivity and Business Processes 42.19 % |
| Amazon com Inc | North America 57.75 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Cloud and Software Business 83.96 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Software 45.22 % |
| Strategy Inc | Software Business 100.00 % |
Source: operating segment revenue as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API, leaf-level reportable segments only (parent roll-up segments are excluded where sub-segments are separately disclosed).
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Citrix Systems Inc's Productivity vs Peers Comparison
Revenue and income per employee, trailing 12 months, in $; market cap in millions of $| Company | Market Cap | Revenue / Employee | Income / Employee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | 13,282 | 368,239 | 36,708 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 3,870,008 | 1,488,067 | 599,771 |
| Amazon com Inc | 2,725,586 | 492,532 | 85,838 |
| Oracle Corporation | 414,645 | 519,617 | 134,184 |
| Sap Se | 249,676 | 378,244 | 75,299 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 220,819 | 226,322 | 35,129 |
| PEERS TOTAL | 8,042,969 | 542,688 | 113,654 |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Citrix Systems Inc's Geographic Revenue Exposure vs Peers
Revenue by country/region as reported in each company's most recent filing. Disclosure granularity varies by filer (some report by country, others by broad region) and is shown as disclosed.| Company | Largest Market |
|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | Americas 57.31 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | US 51.47 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Americas 63.46 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Americas 49.04 % |
| Salesforce Inc | Americas 64.97 % |
| Servicenow Inc | North America 63.26 % |
Source: revenue geography as reported in each company's SEC filings (10-K/10-Q), via the CSIMarket API. Percentages are of that company's own total consolidated revenue for its most recent reported period.
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Citrix Systems Inc's Profitability & Cost Structure
Trailing 12-month margins from SEC-filed financials. Operating margin is compared to the Software & Programming industry median; gross margin, EBITDA margin and capital intensity are compared to the live industry average (347 companies). See the full Software & Programming industry profitability benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 81.35 % | 63.85 % (avg) | +17.5 pp |
| Operating Margin | 9.93 % | industry median | +33.0 pp |
| EBITDA Margin | 23.34 % | 2.76 % (avg) | +20.6 pp |
| Capital Intensity (Capex / Revenue) | 2.55 % | 4.77 % (avg) | -2.2 pp |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. SG&A and R&D as a share of revenue have limited coverage as this data is backfilled and appear only where reported. Higher capital intensity is not inherently negative; it reflects the industry's asset requirements.
Citrix Systems Inc's Valuation vs Competitive Position
Valuation multiples vs the Software & Programming industry average (347 companies, excluding loss-making/negative-equity outliers), alongside returns on capital for context on whether a premium or discount lines up with measurably stronger or weaker returns. See the full Software & Programming industry valuation benchmarks.| Metric | Company | Industry Average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| P/E | 38.4x | 39.4x | -1.0x |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.9x | 21.7x | -1.8x |
| P/B | 20.9x | 5.4x | +15.5x |
| Return on Equity | 54.25 % | industry aggregate | 35.56 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 6.11 % | -0.30 % (avg) | 6.41 % |
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. A valuation premium or discount is not, by itself, a judgment of over- or under-valuation. Compare it against the return and growth context shown elsewhere on this page.
Citrix Systems Inc's Multi-Year Financial Trajectory
Fiscal-year revenue growth, operating margin, return on invested capital and P/E, as reported in SEC filings.| Metric | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 7.69 % | 4.22 % | 4.36 % | -17.36 % | 5.28 % | 1.23 % | 7.51 % | -0.60 % |
| Operating Margin | 9.62 % | 10.69 % | 18.99 % | 20.21 % | 22.80 % | 17.81 % | 18.81 % | 7.35 % |
| Return on Invested Capital | 5.09 % | 5.87 % | 12.94 % | 10.22 % | 20.66 % | 17.32 % | 21.94 % | 4.59 % |
| P/E | 42.6x | 37.1x | 26.1x | - | 26.8x | 22.4x | 31.8x | 37.6x |
Source: CSIMarket API, fiscal-year figures. P/E is this company's own historical ratio at each fiscal year end and can swing sharply around an earnings trough: that is real, not a data error.
Citrix Systems Inc's Strategic Group Map
Every company in Citrix Systems Inc's industry and named-competitor list, plotted by trailing 12-month revenue growth and operating margin. Citrix Systems Inc is shown in red; its closest peers by combined growth, margin and ROIC (the Similar Growth & Profitability group above) are labeled.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Extreme outlier values (from near-zero-revenue companies) are excluded from the plotted cloud but never from the highlighted company or its labeled peers.
Citrix Systems Inc's Competitive Forces (Porter's Five Forces)
Only the forces this data can support honestly are shown; the other three are marked as such rather than guessed.| Force | Assessment | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Barriers to Entry | Lower than typical for the industry | Capital intensity (capex / revenue) of 2.55 % vs industry average 4.77 % (see Profitability & Cost Structure above) |
| Supplier Power | Not covered on this page | See Citrix Systems Inc's dedicated suppliers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Buyer Power | Not covered on this page | See Citrix Systems Inc's dedicated customers page for concentration and dependency data |
| Threat of Substitutes | - | No systematic data source for cross-product substitution exists in this system; not estimated |
Note: this is a partial, data-grounded application of the framework, not a complete strategic assessment. Rivalry and barriers-to-entry readings are mechanical translations of the HHI and capital-intensity figures shown elsewhere on this page, not independent judgments.
Citrix Systems Inc's Industry Attractiveness & Competitive Strength
A CSIMarket composite, not a standard field: each axis is an equal-weighted average of three factors already shown elsewhere on this page (industry growth, industry profitability and rivalry for attractiveness; relative market share, profitability and growth vs industry for strength). Disclosed as a designed methodology, not a precision measurement.
Citrix Systems Inc falls in the Low attractiveness / Medium strength cell: Harvest.
Source: CSIMarket API, trailing 12 months. Each axis score is a simple 1(low)/2(medium)/3(high) average across its three inputs -- a transparent, disclosed simplification, not a validated academic scoring model.
Citrix Systems Inc's SWOT
Every point below is a fixed rule applied to a metric already shown elsewhere on this page (Market Structure, Profitability, Valuation, Run-Rate, Stock Performance, Quality Breadth) not an independent strategic assessment. A blank quadrant means no rule was met, not that none apply.Strengths
- Operating margin 33.0 points above the industry median.
- Return on equity 35.6 points above the industry aggregate.
- Latest-quarter revenue run-rate is accelerating (+3.7% annualized vs trailing 12 months).
Weaknesses
- Piotroski F-Score of 2 or below, the standard financial-distress signal.
Opportunities
- Industry revenue growing at a healthy 11.6% median pace.
- Trades at a lower P/E than the industry average (38.4x vs 39.4x) despite a higher return on invested capital -- a possible re-rating opportunity.
Threats
- Tracked peer group's revenue run-rate is broadly decelerating (-28.3% annualized).
Methodology: mechanical, rule-based SWOT. Each bullet reuses a figure already sourced and cited elsewhere on this page; nothing here is generated narrative or independent analyst judgment.
Citrix Systems Inc's Financial Strength vs Peers Comparison
Quick ratio, working capital, debt to equity and asset turnover, trailing 12 months| Company | Quick Ratio | Working Capital | Debt / Equity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | 0.28 | 0.74 | 5.46 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 0.13 | 1.31 | 0.11 |
| Amazon com Inc | 0.38 | 1.07 | 0.21 |
| Oracle Corporation | 0.72 | 1.12 | 2.83 |
| Sap Se | 0.47 | 1.16 | 0.10 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 0.29 | 0.87 | 3.47 |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Quick ratio = cash / current liabilities; working capital ratio = current assets / current liabilities; asset turnover = revenue / total assets. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Citrix Systems Inc's Revenue and Income Growth vs Peers
Quarterly revenue and net income growth, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Revenue Y/Y | Income Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | Q2 2022 | +5.8 % | +83.9 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +17.7 % | +31.3 % |
| Amazon com Inc | Q2 2026 | +19.9 % | +244.9 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | +24.0 % | +62.6 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +12.5 % | +143.0 % |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +1.1 % | -1.3 % |
| PEERS TOTAL | +17.4 % | +65.2 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Growth is shown only where both periods are positive. Peers in the Blank Checks industry are excluded.
Citrix Systems Inc's Peers' Costs of Sales and Capital Expenditures
Context for revenue growth: peer costs and capex, year over year and quarter over quarter| Company | Period | Costs Y/Y | Capex Y/Y |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | Q2 2022 | -3.3 % | -28.5 % |
| Microsoft Corporation | Q2 2026 | +22.9 % | +109.6 % |
| Amazon com Inc | Q2 2026 | +18.5 % | +300.3 % |
| Oracle Corporation | Q3 2026 | - | +235.2 % |
| Sap Se | Q4 2025 | +9.6 % | - |
| International Business Machines Corporation | Q2 2026 | +3.6 % | +9.0 % |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
Citrix Systems Inc's Returns and Turnover vs Peers
ROA, ROI and ROE (trailing 12 months), receivables and inventory turnover| Company | ROA | ROI | ROE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | 4.82% | 6.92% | 54.25% |
| Microsoft Corporation | 19.76% | 22.48% | 34.22% |
| Amazon com Inc | 15.21% | 23.40% | 30.50% |
| Oracle Corporation | 7.73% | 9.84% | 44.45% |
| Sap Se | 10.03% | 12.84% | 15.66% |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 7.07% | 7.03% | 33.43% |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
ROA = net income / total assets; ROI = net income / investments; ROE = net income / equity; turnover ratios use trailing 12 month revenue (receivables) and cost of sales (inventory).
Citrix Systems Inc's Valuation vs Peers
P/E, price to sales, PEG, price to cash flow and price to book| Company | P/E | Price / Sales |
|---|---|---|
| Citrix Systems Inc. | 40.08 | 4.01 |
| Microsoft Corporation | 28.93 | 11.66 |
| Amazon com Inc | 20.10 | 3.51 |
| Oracle Corporation | 21.66 | 5.66 |
| Sap Se | 34.87 | 6.00 |
| International Business Machines Corporation | 20.52 | 3.20 |
| PEERS AVERAGE | 27.68 | 5.79 |
Sign in to see all peers for Citrix Systems Inc..
P/E = price / diluted EPS (trailing 12 months); PEG = P/E divided by EPS growth; the average row divides the peers' combined market cap by their combined income, sales, cash flow and equity.
